UiT School of Business and Economics Working Papers in Economics https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/WPEcon <p>A series for non peer-reviewed working papers written by members of the Centre for Economic Research at the UiT School of Business and Economics.</p> en-US <p>Authors retain copyright and license the work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>.&nbsp;It is the responsibility of the author to secure all necessary copyright permissions for the use of third-party materials in their manuscript.</p> derek.clark@uit.no (Derek J. Clark) septentrio@ub.uit.no (Septentrio Academic Publishing) Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:35:47 +0200 OJS http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Levels and subject https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/WPEcon/article/view/5867 <p>In this study, we use an experimental survey approach to if the degree of positionality is sensitive to variations in <em>reference levels </em>and <em>targeted subject</em>. Based on previous research in economics and psychology, our hypotheses are that 1) people are more positional when they choose between alternatives with relatively high consumption levels, and 2) people are more positional when they choose for a hypothetical grandchild, than for themselves. We measure positional preferences in five domains – Income, housing, vacation and SAT-score, and test our hypotheses on a large representative sample from the US (N=1300). &nbsp;As social demographic indicators, we include information about gender, birth year, children or grandchildren, individual income, vacation days, size of home and reported SAT-score. Our results suggest that the instruments commonly used to elicit positional preferences are relatively insensitive to variations in consumption levels and targeted subject, with a few important exceptions. First, we find that positional preferences for income and SAT scores depend on the reference level used in the hypothetical choice scenarios. Second, our results suggest that people are significantly more likely to choose the positional option for housing when they choose for a hypothetical grandchild than when they choose for themselves.</p> Ingvild Mageli Copyright (c) 2021 Ingvild Mageli https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/WPEcon/article/view/5867 Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0200