Spanish Verbs of Becoming and Cluster Concepts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/1.12.2.7207Palabras clave:
change of state verbs, cluster concepts, exemplar, copular verbs, similarityResumen
El análisis del comportamiento de los verbos de cambio de estado en español (por ejemplo, volverse rico), también conocidos como verbos pseudocopulativos o semicopulativos, ha recibido relativamente poca atención en estudios anteriores. Bybee & Eddington (2006) (B&E) analizan estos verbos empleando un modelo basado en ejemplares, el cual a su vez está basado en la frecuencia y la similitud semántica. Este artículo presenta un análisis de los verbos de cambio de estado basado en la noción de conceptos en cúmulo (Jackendoff 2002, 1983), situados dentro de una escala, como una explicación alternativa a la de B&E, que explica el comportamiento de esta clase de verbos de una manera más amplia y precisa. El presente estudio muestra que existen fuertes tendencias en el uso de adjetivos con un verbo de cambio de estado determinado, que se correlacionan con su uso con los verbos copulativos ser/estar. Un punto clave es que el modelo de conceptos en cúmulo da cuenta de usos de adjetivos que no entran en ninguna agrupación particular en el modelo de B&E. Un estudio de corpus sirve para respaldar el análisis. El presente trabajo representa una contribución original en la medida en que es el único estudio que trata los verbos de cambio de estado utilizando la noción de conceptos en cúmulo.
Referencias
Albright, A., & Hayes, B. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/ experimental study. Cognition 90(2).119-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-X
Ambridge, Ben. 2020. Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language 40(5-6).509-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719869731
Boas, Hans. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee and D.
Wanner (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics, 143–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.69.14bos
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886
Bybee, Joan. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 49-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004
Bybee, Joan, and David Eddington. 2006. A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of becoming. Language 82.323-355. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081
Clements, J. Clancy. 2006. Ser-estar in the Predicate Adjective Construction. In J. Clancy Clements & Jiyoung Yoon (eds), Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax, 161-202. Basingstoke UK, Palgrave-Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522688_8
Davies, Mark. 2002. Corpus del Español. www.corpusdelespanol.org.
Delbecque, Nicole and Lise Van Gorp. 2015. The pseudo-copular use of the Spanish verbs hacerse and volverse: two types of change. CogniTextes Vol. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.843.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.547-619. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021
Eddington, David. 1999. On 'becoming' in Spanish: A corpus analysis of verbs expressing change of state. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18.23-35.
Eddington, David. 2000. Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology. Lingua, 110(4), 281- 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00043-1
Eddington, David. 2002. Disambiguating Spanish change of state verbs. Hispania 85.921-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/4141261
Goldberg, Adele, & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532-568. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129
Huang, Yi Ting, and Steven Pinker. 2010. Lexical semantics and irregular inflection. Language and cognitive processes 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690961003589476
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
Jackendoff, Ray. 2019. Conceptual Semantics. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: Theories, 86-113. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589245-004
Jackendoff, Ray, and Jenny Audring. 2020. The texture of the lexicon: Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827900.001.0001
Luján, Marta. 1981. The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua 54.165-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90068-1
Marcos Marin, Francisco. 1992. Corpus oral de referencia del español contemporáneo. Textual corpus, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Masini, Francesca, & Jenny Audring. 2019. Construction Morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 365-89. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.25
McQueen, Cutler, and Norris. 2006. Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon. Cognitive Science 30.1113-1126 . https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_79
Morimoto, Yuko, and Victoria Pavón Lucero. 2004. Aproximación semantica a la gramática de ponerse y quedarse. Studia Romanica Posnanensia 31.385-392. https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2004.31.037
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure 45.137-157. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and Rules. New York: Basic Books.
Pinker, Steven. 2006. Whatever happened to the past tense debate? Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, ed. by Eric Bakovic, Junko Ito, John J. McCarthy. Createspace Independent Pub.
Pinker, Steven, y Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.456-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3
ten Hacken, Pius. 2014. Delineating derivation and inflection. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, ed. by Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10-25.
Thompson, Sandra. 2002. Object complements and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26. 125-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho
Van Gorp, Lise. 2015. Pseudo-copular use of the Spanish verbs ponerse and quedarse: two types of change. CogniTextes Vol. 13. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Carlos Benavides
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
