Polhavet / Arctic Ocean 2050 Science Plan

Allen, A. et al., 2025. End-to-end data-driven weather prediction. Nature 641, 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08897-0

Alvarez Fanjul E. et al., 2024. The Ocean Prediction DCC Architecture for Ocean Forecasting. In Funjul, E. et al. (eds.), An asset for capacity development and a roadmap to deliver as one. UN Ocean Decade flip book 2, 71 pp. https://doi.org/10.48670/oofsarchitecture

Årthun, M. et al., 2025. The future Barents Sea—A synthesis of physical, biogeochemical, and ecological changes toward 2050 and 2100. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 13(1), 00046. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2024.00046

Årthun, M., et al., 2025. Atlantification drives recent strengthening of the Arctic overturning circulation. Science Advances 11, eadu1794. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adu1794

Baird, A. F. et al., 2025. Ocean space surveillance and real‐time event characterization using distributed acoustic sensing on submarine networks. Seismological Research Letters 96, 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240360

Bergmann, M. et al., 2022. Plastic pollution in the Arctic. Nature Review Earth and Environment 3, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00279-8

Bernatchez, L. et al., 2024. Genomics for monitoring and understanding species responses to global climate change. Nature Review Genetics 25, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00657-y

Bertelsen, R., 2024. Divided Arctic in a divided world. Strategic Analysis 48(6), 568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2025.2453322

Bethke, I., et al., 2021. NorCPM1 and its contribution to CMIP6 DCPP. Geoscientific Model Development 14(11), 7073–7116. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7073-2021

Blackstock, K. L. et al., 2023. Implementing post-normal science with or for EU policy actors: using quantitative story-telling. Sustainability Science 18, 1235–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01265-1

Bluhm, B. A. et al., 2015. A tale of two basins: An integrated physical and biological perspective of the deep Arctic Ocean. Progress in Oceanography 139, 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.07.011

Bracco, A. et al., 2025. Machine learning for the physics of climate. Nature Review Physics 7, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00776-3

Brandt, S. et al., 2023. Revisiting the footprints of climate change in Arctic marine food webs: An assessment of knowledge gained since 2010. Frontiers in Marine Science 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1096222

CAFF, 2017. State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna International Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland, 197 pp. https://arcticbiodiversity.is/marine

Calvet, N. et al., 2024. Shifting invertebrate distributions in the Barents Sea since pre-1900. Frontiers in Marine Science 11, 1421475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1421475

Chitty, O., et al., 2025. Workshop report: The governance of Arctic climate interventions. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, August 11, 18 pp. https://www.belfercenter.org/research-analysis/arctic-geoengineering-governance

Clifford, K. R. et al., 2022. Responding to ecological transformation: Mental models, external constraints, and manager decision-making. BioScience 72(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab086

Cohen, J., et al., 2020. Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather. Nature Climate Change 10, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0662-y

Dahl, J. et al., 2024. Empowering Arctic Indigenous Peoples: Celebrating 50 years of Indigenous diplomacy. IWGIA, ICC, Saami Council, 152 pp. https://www.iwgia.org/en/publications/empoweringarcticindigenouspeoples50yearsdiplomacy?lang=en

Dankel, D. J. et al., 2012. Advice under uncertainty in the marine system. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr179

Dankel, D. J. et al., 2020. The Melting Snowball Effect: A heuristic for sustainable Arctic governance under climate change. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00537

De Lucia, V., 2022. The BBNJ negotiations and ecosystem governance in the Arctic. Marine Policy 142, 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103756

De Lucia, V., 2024. The integration of the ecosystem approach in the BBNJ agreement—An initial assessment of limits and opportunities. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law 33(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12576

Dijkstra, H. A., and van Westen, R. M., 2025. The Probability of an AMOC collapse onset in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Marine Science 18, 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-040324-024822

Dodds, K. et al., 2025. Geopolitics of sea ice. In Thomas, N. (ed.), Sea Ice: its physics, chemistry, biology, geology and societal importance, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 895–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394213764.ch24

Doney, S. C. et al., 2012. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Science 4(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611

Dörr, J. et al., 2024. Expanding influence of Atlantic and Pacific Ocean heat transport on winter sea‐ice variability in a warming Arctic. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 129(2), e2023JC019900. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC019900

Fauchald, P. et al., 2021. Poleward shifts in marine fisheries under Arctic warming. Environmental Research Letters 16(7), 074057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1010

Field, C. B. et al., 2012. IPCC: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 582 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/managing-the-risks-of-extreme-events-and-disasters-to-advance-climate-change-adaptation/

Findlay, H. S. et al., 2025. Ocean acidification: another planetary boundary crossed. Global Change Biology 31(6), e70238. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70238

Fong, A. A. et al., 2024. Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Ecosystem. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 12(1), 00135. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00135

Fossheim, M. et al., 2015. Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic. Nature Climate Change 5(7), 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2647

Fox-Kemper, B. et al., 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. In IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Chapter 9: Ocean, Cryosphere, and Sea Level Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1211–1362. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.011

Fransner, F. et al., 2023. Phytoplankton abundance in the Barents Sea is predictable up to five years in advance. Communications Earth & Environment 4(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00791-9

Friis, K. et al., 2023. Navigating breakup: Security realities of freezing politics and thawing landscapes in the Arctic. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Report, 18 pp. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep47338.1

Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. (eds.), 1990. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Springer, 231 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1

Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R., 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R., 1994. The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics 10(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90108-2

Gaina, C. et al., 2025. Arctic Ocean bathymetry and its connections to tectonics, oceanography and climate. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment 6, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-025-00647-0

Gou, R. et al., 2025. The changing nature of future Arctic marine heatwaves and its potential impacts on the ecosystem. Nature Climate Change 15, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02224-7

Gutowski, W. J. et al., 2020. The ongoing need for high-resolution regional climate models: Process understanding and stakeholder information. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 101(5), E664–E683. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0113.1

Haines, H. et al., 2025. Poor performance of regime shift detection methods in marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 82(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae103

Haug, T. et al., 2017. Future harvest of living resources in the Arctic Ocean north of the Nordic and Barents Seas: A review of possibilities and constraints. Fisheries Research 188, 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.12.002

Hazeleger, W. et al., 2024. Digital twins of the Earth with and for humans. Communication Earth & Environment 5, 463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01626-x

Hess, P., 2025. Fast, scale-adaptive and uncertainty-aware downscaling of Earth system model fields with generative machine learning. Nature Machine Intelligence 7, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-025-00980-5

Heuzé, C. and Jahn, A., 2024. The first ice-free day in the Arctic Ocean could occur before 2030. Nature Communications 15, 10101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54508-3

Hoogensen G. et al. (eds.), 2020. Routledge handbook of Arctic security. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 462 pp.

Husson, B. et al., 2024. Borealization impacts shelf ecosystems across the Arctic. Frontiers in Environmental Science 12, 1481420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1481420

IASC, 2026. ICARP IV final outcomes report. International Arctic Science Committee, 72 pp. https://icarp.iasc.info/publications/publications-icarp-iv

Ingvaldsen, R. B. et al., 2021. Physical manifestations and ecological implications of Arctic Atlantification. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 2(12), 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00228-x

IPBES, 2024. Thematic assessment report on the underlying causes of biodiversity loss and the determinants of transformative change and options for achieving the 2050 vision for biodiversity of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11382215

Isaac, N. J. B. et al., 2020. Data integration for large-scale models of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 35(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.006

Jacobsen, M. and Wilson Rowe, E. (eds.), 2026. A research agenda for Arctic security and governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 220 pp.

Jahn, A. et al., 2024. Projections of an ice-free Arctic Ocean. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 5, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00515-9

Jakobsson, M. et al., 2016. Evidence for an ice shelf covering the central Arctic Ocean during the penultimate glaciation. Nature Communications 7, 10365. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10365

Jeuring, J. et al., 2024. Map-based ensemble forecasts for maritime operations: An interactive usability assessment with decision scenarios. Weather, Climate & Society 16, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-23-0076.1

Jørgensen, L. L. (ed.), 2025. Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of human activities, its pressures, and vulnerability of the ecosystem. ICES Cooperative Research Reports 361, 220 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.30540437

Jørgensen, L. L., 2024. The third international conference on the Ecosystem Approach to Management (EA) in the Arctic Large Marine Ecosystems. Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment conference report, 135 pp. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/9hl396d

Juranek, L. W., 2022. Changing biogeochemistry of the Arctic Ocean: Surface nutrient and CO2 cycling in a warming, melting north. Oceanography 35(3–4), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2022.120

Karniadakis, G. E. et al., 2021. Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Karp, M. A. et al., 2025. Applications of species distribution modeling and future needs to support marine resource management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 82(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf024

Kaufman, D. S. et al., 2021. Cross-Chapter Box 2.1: Paleoclimate Reference Periods in the Assessment Report. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 294–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896

Kemp, L. et al., 2022. Climate endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119

Khorrami, N., 2025. The Future of Arctic Governance in a Fractured Geopolitical Landscape. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Georgetown University, accessed 25 May 2026. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/conflict-security/the-future-of-arctic-governance-in-a-fractured-geopolitical-landscape/

Köhler, A. E. B. et al., 2022. Enhancing seismic calving event identification in Svalbard through empirical matched field processing and machine learning. Geophysical Journal International 230, 1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac117

Kortsch, S. et al., 2012. Climate-driven regime shifts in Arctic marine benthos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 14052–14057. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207509109

Kramvig, B. and Salmela, T. T., 2026. When the land becomes the sea and the sea becomes the land: Disrupting processes of appropriation of Miärralándda. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251410805

McKay, D. I. A. et al., 2022. Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, 1171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950

Landrum, L. and Holland, M. M., 2020. Extremes become routine in an emerging new Arctic. Nature Climate Change 10, 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0892-z

Lee, C. M. et al., 2022. Emerging technologies and approaches for in situ, autonomous observing in the Arctic. Oceanography 35(3–4), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2022.127

Leichenko, R. and O’Brien, K. (eds.), 2024. Climate and society: Transforming the future (2nd ed.). Polity Press, Wiley, 296 pp.

Lightfoot, S. R., 2016. Global Indigenous politics: A subtle revolution. Worlding beyond the West 8, Routledge, 264 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670669

Miedtank, A. et al., 2024. Marine digital twins for enhanced ocean understanding. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 36, 101268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101268

Müller, M., et al., 2023. Arctic shipping trends during hazardous weather and sea ice conditions and the Polar Code’s effectiveness. npj Ocean Sustainability 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00021-x

Nicolaus, M. et al., 2022. Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Snow and sea ice. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 10(1), 000046. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.000046

Nipen, T. et al., 2024. Regional data-driven weather modeling with a global stretched-grid. Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-25-0001.1

O’Brien, K., 2018. Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 31, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010

O’Brien, K. et al., 2023. Fractal approaches to scaling transformations to sustainability. Ambio 52, 1448–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01873-w

Onarheim, I. H. et al., 2018. Seasonal and regional manifestation of Arctic sea ice loss. Journal of Climate 31(12), 4917–4932. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0427.1

Østhagen, A., 2025. Konfliktspiral og stormaktsrivalisering i nordområdene. In Svendsen, Ø. and Haugevik, K. (eds.), Dilemmaer i norsk utenrikspolitikk. Cappelen Damm akademisk, pp. 297–322.

Østhagen, A. and Rottem, S. V., 2023. Geopolitics and increased tension? Differentiating between political dynamics in the Arctic. In Østhagen, A. (ed.), Norway’s Arctic Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 23–37.

Pedersen, R. B. et al., 2021. Fagutredning mineralressurser i Norskehavet: landskapstrekk, naturtyper og bentiske økosystemer. Senter for Dyphavsforskning, University of Bergen, 128 pp. https://www.sodir.no/globalassets/1-sodir/fakta/havbunnsmineraler/fagutredning-mineralressurser-norskehavet-naturforhold-uib.pdf

Pecuchet, L. et al., 2025. Arctic and Subarctic marine heatwaves and their ecological impacts. Frontiers in Environmental Science 13, 1473890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1473890

Pikitch, E. K. et al., 2004. Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305(5682), 346–347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1098222

Pinsky, M. et al., 2013. Marine taxa track local climate velocities. Science 341, 1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239352

Polyakov, I. et al., 2020. Borealization of the Arctic Ocean in response to anomalous advection from sub-Arctic seas. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00491

Polyakov, I. V. et al., 2023. Fluctuating Atlantic inflows modulate Arctic atlantification. Science 381, 972–979. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh5158

Qi, D. et al., 2022. Climate change drives rapid decadal acidification in the Arctic Ocean from 1994 to 2020. Science 377, 1544–1550. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo0383

Rabe, B. et al., 2022. Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Physical oceanography. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 10(1), 00062. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00062

Ramirez-Llodra, E. et al., 2023. Hot vents beneath an icy ocean: The Aurora Vent Field, Gakkel Ridge, revealed. Oceanography 36(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2023.103

Ramirez-Llodra, E. et al., 2024. The emerging picture of a diverse deep Arctic Ocean seafloor: From habitats to ecosystems. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 12(1), 00140. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00140

Rantanen, M. et al., 2022. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment 3(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3

Ravetz, J. R., 1999. What is Post-Normal Science? Futures 31(7), 647–654.

Reiersen, L.-O. et al., 2024. The role of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) in reducing pollution of the Arctic and around the globe. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology 17, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100302

Renaud, P. et al., 2011. Is the poleward expansion by Atlantic cod and haddock threatening native polar cod, Boreogadus saida? Polar Biology 35, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-011-1085-z

Saami Council, 2023. Climate change in Sápmi – an overview and a path forward. Sámiráđđi, 136 pp. https://www.saamicouncil.net/documentarchive/sami-climate-report

Scheffer, M. et al., 2012. Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338(6105), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225244

Scheffer, M. et al., 2015. Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems. Science 347, 1317–1319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa3769

Sharma, M. (ed.), 2017. Radical transformational leadership: Strategic action for change agents. North Atlantic Books, 368 pp.

Shu, Q. et al., 2022. Arctic Ocean Amplification in a warming climate in CMIP6 models. Science Advances 8, eabn9755. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9755

Shu, Q. et al., 2025. Arctic Ocean dynamical downscaling data for understanding past and future climate change. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 42, 1761–1775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-025-4259-2

Shupe, M. D. et al., 2022. Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 10(1), 00060. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00060

Siegert, M., et al., 2025. Safeguarding the polar regions from dangerous geoengineering: A critical assessment of proposed concepts and future prospects. Frontiers in Science 3, 1527393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2025.1527393

Skjøldal, H. R. (ed.), 2022. Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of the ecosystem. ICES Cooperative Research Reports 341, 341 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.20191787

Sluijs, A. et al., 2006. Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum. Nature 441, 610–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04668

Sørensen, A. J., 2021. Testination North. In Wassmann, P. (ed.), Whither the Arctic Ocean? Research, knowledge needs and development en route to the New Arctic. Fundacion BBVA, pp. 165–175. https://www.biophilia-fbbva.es/en/publicaciones/whither-the-arctic-ocean-research-knowledge-needs-and-development-en-route-to-the-new-arctic-2/

Spataro, F. et al., 2025. Man-made emerging contaminants in the High-Arctic fjord Kongsfjorden (Svalbard Archipelago, Norway): Occurrence, sources and risk assessment. Science of The Total Environment 969, 178936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178936

Steinberg, P. and Kristoffersen, B., 2018. Building a blue economy in the Arctic Ocean: Sustaining the sea or sustaining the state? In Gad, U. P. and Strandsberg, J. (eds.), The politics of sustainability in the Arctic. Routledge, pp. 136–148. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351031981-9

Stenseth, N. C. et al., 2020. Attuning to a changing ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 177(34), 20363–20371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915352117

Stern, H. L., 2025. Regime shift in Arctic Ocean sea ice extent. Geophysical Research Letters 52, e2024GL114546. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114546

Stokke, O. and Hønneland, G. (eds.), 2007. International Cooperation and Arctic Governance: Regime effectiveness and northern region building. Routledge, 224 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962336

Stokke, R. et al., 2020. Tailoring hydrothermal vent biodiversity toward improved biodiscovery using a novel in situ enrichment strategy. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00249

Sundh, J., 2024. Human behavior in the context of low-probability high-impact events. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03403-9

Theissinger et al., 2023. How genomics can help biodiversity conservation. Trends in Genetics 39, 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2023.01.005

Timmermans, M.-L. and Marshall, J., 2020. Understanding Arctic Ocean circulation: A review of ocean dynamics in a changing climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 125, e2018JC014378. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014378

Townhall, B. L. et al., 2022. Pollution in the Arctic Ocean: An overview of multiple pressures and implications for ecosystem services. Ambio 51(2), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01657-0

Tzachor, A. et al., 2023. Digital twins: a steppingstone to achieve ocean sustainability? npj Ocean Sustainability 2, 156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00023-9

Wiedmann, I. et al., 2020. What feeds the benthos in the Arctic Basins? Assembling a carbon budget for the deep Arctic Ocean. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00224

Wilson Rowe, E., 2025. Blue Visions: ordering a changing Arctic Ocean. Global Environmental Politics 25(3), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.3

Woon, C. and Dodds, K. (eds.), 2020. “Observing” the Arctic: Asia in the Arctic Council and Beyond. Edward Elgar Publishing, 256 pp.

Wu, F. and Li, T., 2025. International law concerning the environmental protection in Arctic: what is left behind UNCLOS and the BBNJ Agreement? Frontiers in Marine Science 12, 1680697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1680697

Yasunaka, S. et al., 2023. An assessment of CO2 uptake in the Arctic Ocean from 1985 to 2018. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 37, e2023GB007806. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007806

Zscheischler, J. et al., 2020. A typology of compound weather and climate events. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1(7), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0060-z