GoNorth 2022 Cruise Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/7.8786Keywords:
Arctic Ocean, Continental Shelf, GeosciencesAbstract
The Norwegian part of the Arctic, including Svalbard, is undergoing major climatic changes, affecting sea ice, the ocean, and marine life. Yet substantial knowledge gaps remain, particularly in the central Arctic Ocean, where accessibility is limited and conducting research activities requires specialised equipment. On longer time scales, the Arctic Ocean has also undergone major geological changes. Evolving from being an isolated, partly freshwater basin, the Arctic Ocean is now an integrated part of the global ocean. When and how this transition occurred is still unclear, largely due to limited geological and geophysical data. The GoNorth project aims to reduce these knowledge gaps through four multidisciplinary cruises onboard of RV Kronprins Haakon between 2022 and 2025. The project will also provide extensive training opportunities and will help build Arctic research capacity.
The first GoNorth cruise took place from 14 October to 19 November 2022 and was divided into two legs. The first leg (14 October–3 November 2022) started and ended in Longyearbyen including 29 scientists and research engineers from nine institutions. The study area lay north of Nordaustlandet and Kvitøya, from the continental shelf to the Nansen Basin, where water depths approach 4000 metres. A total of 539 km of seismic data was acquired to investigate the geological evolution of this part of the Arctic Ocean. Sediment samples were collected from the seabed for analyses of both present‑day environmental conditions and longer‑term environmental changes. Seawater and sea ice samples were analised for identification of organisms in sea ice ecosystems. Measurements of vessel icing, georeferenced imagery during ice operations, and continuous monitoring of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas, were also part of the activities. As part of this expedition, new technologies were tested, including a seafloor rig and an autonomous drifting platform, both recording ocean measurements during this first cruise. Some of the seismic measurements were conducted using seafloor nodes deployed by an underwater robot—techniques not previously applied in this area.
The second leg (4–19 November 2022) focused on the Knipovich Ridge, a segment of the mid‑ocean spreading ridge in deep water west of Svalbard. Twenty‑three scientists and research engineers took part on this second leg. The objectives were: 1) to locate, map, and sample hydrothermal mineral deposits, and 2) to map and sample seabed areas with manganese crusts.
This report presents an overview of the activities conducted during the first GoNorth cruise. This work is expected to provide a foundation for future research and for educating new scientists with expertise in this strategically important region of the Kingdom of Norway.
Downloads
References
Berge, J., et al. 2015. In the dark: A review of ecosystem processes during the Arctic polar night. Prog. Oceanogr. 139: p. 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.08.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.08.005
CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity, U. Nations, Editor. 1992: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 05.06.1992.
Chen, C., et al., 2015. Circulation in the Arctic Ocean: Results from a high-resolution coupled ice-sea nested Global-FVCOM and Arctic-FVCOM system. Prog. Oceanogr. 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.12.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.12.002
Cochrane, S.K.J., et al. 2009. Benthic macrofauna and productivity regimes in the Barents Sea — Ecological implications in a changing Arctic. J. Sea Res. 61(4): p. 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2009.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2009.01.003
Crépin, A.-S., M. Karcher, Gascard, J.-C. 2017. Arctic Climate Change, Economy and Society (ACCESS): Integrated perspectives. Ambio, 46(3): p. 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0953-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0953-3
Elliott, M. 2011. Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures – A numbered guide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62: p. 651-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.11.033 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.11.033
Elliott, M., A. Borja, Cormier, R. 2020. Managing marine resources sustainably: A proposed integrated systems analysis approach. Ocean Coast. Manag. 197: p. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105315 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105315
Eriksen, E., et al. 2018. Particularly valuable and vulnerable areas (SVO) in Norwegian seas - Environmental values, in Rapport fra Havforskningen. p. 308. https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/rapport-fra-havforskningen-2021-26
Falk-Petersen, P., V., Berge, J., Cottier, F.R. 2015. At the rainbow’s end: high productivity fueled by winter upwelling along an Arctic shelf. Polar Biol. 35: p. 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1482-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1482-1
Falk-Petersen, S., et al. 2000. Lipids, trophic relationships and biodiversity in Arctic and Antarctic krill. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: p. 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-194 https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-194
Griewank PJ, Notz D. 2013. Insights into brine dynamics and sea ice desalination from a 1-D model study of gravity drainage. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans. 118(7): 3370–3386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20247 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20247
Jakobsson, M., et al. 2020. The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 4.0, Sci. Data, 7(1), 176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0520-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6644-0_68-3
Karaseva, N.P., et al. 2016. Taxonomy, geographical and bathymetric distribution of vestimentiferan tubeworms (Annelida, Siboglinidae). Biol. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. 43, 937–969. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359016090132 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359016090132
Kovacs A. 1996. Part I . Bulk Salinity Versus Ice Floe Thickness. CRREL Report 96(June): 1–16. https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/server/api/core/bitstreams/81b728f8-8510-4ef8-e053-411ac80adeb3/content
Lind, S., R.B. Ingvaldsen, Furevik, T. 2018. Arctic warming hotspot in the northern Barents Sea linked to declining sea-ice import. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8(7): p. 634-639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0205-y https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0205-y
M-1303/2019, Faglig forum for norske havområder. Særlig verdifulle og sårbare områder - Faggrunnlag for revisjon og oppdatering av forvaltningsplanene for norske havområder.
Morales Maqueda, M.A., A.J. Willmott, Biggs, N.R.T. 2004. Polynya Dynamics: a Review of Observations and Modeling. Rev. Geophys. 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000116 https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000116
Muilwijk, M., et al. 2018. Atlantic Water Heat Transport Variability in the 20th Century Arctic Ocean From a Global Ocean Model and Observations. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 123(11): p. 8159-8179. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC01432 https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014327
Notz D. 2005. Thermodynamic and fluid-dynamical processes in sea ice. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
Polyakov, I.V., et al. 2017.Greater role for Atlantic inflows on sea-ice loss in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean. Science, 356(6335): p. 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8204 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8204
Renaud, P.E., et al. 2019. Arctic Sensitivity? Suitable Habitat for Benthic Taxa Is Surprisingly Robust to Climate Change. Front. Mar. Sci. 6(538). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00538 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00538
Serreze, M.C. and W.N. Meier. 2019. The Arctic's sea ice cover: trends, variability, predictability, and comparisons to the Antarctic. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1436(1): p. 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13856 https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13856
Wang Q, Lu P, Leppäranta M, Cheng B, Zhang G, Li Z. 2020. Physical Properties of Summer Sea Ice in the Pacific Sector of the Arctic During 2008–2018. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 125(9): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016371 https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016371
Wassmann, P. 2011. Arctic marine ecosystems an era of rapid change. Prog. Oceanogr. 90: p. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.002
Wassmann, P., et al. 2011. Footprints of climate change in the Arctic marine ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 17(2): p. 1235-1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02311.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02311.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jan Sverre Laberg, Daniel Albert, Franck Andersen, Sabine Cochrane, Stijn De Schepper, Frode Evensen, Thomas Funck, Truls Holm, Vegard Hornnes, Frode Leirvik, Juan Camilo Meza Cala, Alexander Minakov, Kai Roger Loven, Bjørn Løfquist, Orlando Martinez Bautista, Nabil Panchi, Sondre Pedersen, Thor-Arne Pettersen, Bent Ole Ruud, Lars Rasmussen, Paul Rübsamen-von Døhren, Tom Arne Rydningen, Evgenii Salganik, William Skjold, Johan Skøld, Andreas Storebø, Jon Thomassen Hestetun, Per Trinhammer, Max Weber, Ingvild Aarrestad, Anna Aase, Jonas Broberg, Sissel H. Eriksen, Eyvind Ernstsen, Maja Jæger, Marco Micheel, Sabina S. Palinkas, Mauro Passarella, Rolf Birger Pedersen, Pedro Ribeiro, Simen Rønne, Eszter Sendula, Eirik Siira, Håvard H. Stubseid, Ingunn Thorseth, Eirik Valdar, Thilde Voje, Gunnar Sand, Lucía Gutiérrez-Loza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Norges Forskningsråd
Grant numbers 346045
