Open Science & PhD Candidates

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/19.5302

Keywords:

academic publications, academics, bad science, education, library, Norway, Open Access, Open Data, Open Education, Open Science, P-hacking, Plan S, psychology, publishing, scholarly publishing, science, Tromsø, UiT, vitenskap

Abstract

How can you inform Ph.D. Candidates and early career researchers about Open Science without becoming too political? Is information given about open science in conflict with the expectations for publishing from our universities? Torstein Låg, psychologist and senior academic librarian at the University Library at UiT The Arctic University of Norway, weighs in on this topic. Låg is also one of the editors of the web resource PhDonTrack.net. The aim for Ph.D. on Track is to enable beginning researchers and Ph.D. Candidates to easily access information on searching and reviewing scholarly literature, on academic writing, and on sharing and publishing reports and data.

The host of this episode is Erik Lieungh.

This episode was first published 29 May 2019.

Author Biographies

Torstein Låg, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Torstein Låg is a psychologist and senior academic librarian at the University Library at UiT The Arctic University of Norway. He is also one of the editors of the web resource PhDonTrack.net.

Erik Lieungh, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Erik Lieungh is a digital adviser at the University Library and the host and editor of Open Science Talk.

Published

2020-02-04

How to Cite

Låg, T., & Lieungh, E. (2020). Open Science & PhD Candidates. Open Science Talk, (19). https://doi.org/10.7557/19.5302