Towards best practices for authorship and research evaluation: Effects of performance metrics and the Leiden Manifesto

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/5.4266

Abstract

Watch the VIDEO here.

New forms of evaluation are reconfiguring science in ways we are only beginning to understand. In this talk, I will address a key challenge in social-scientific research regarding how evaluations are implicated in scientific understandings of the world. I will address how public sector transformations (including a stronger emphasis on national economic goals such as innovation and growth) are introducing highly particular notions of ‘good’ performance and uses of evaluative metrics. Using empirical material and results from recent projects, the talk will reflect on how these trends are affecting knowledge production processes in different fields. I will also suggest ways to think more creatively and responsibly about the affordances of evaluation and indicators in academic settings.

Metrics

PDF views
401
Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202625
|
Twitter
2

Author Biography

Sarah de Rijcke, Leiden University

Sarah de Rijcke is associate professor and Deputy director at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University. In Leiden, she leads a research group that analyses academic evaluation processes, changing research cultures, knowledge infrastructures, and roles of research in and for society. Sarah is fellow at the TUM-Institute for Advanced Study, and a member of the Young Academy of Europe. www.ses-leidenuniv.com | www.sarahderijcke.nl

Downloads

Published

2017-11-15

How to Cite

de Rijcke, S. (2017). Towards best practices for authorship and research evaluation: Effects of performance metrics and the Leiden Manifesto. Septentrio Conference Series, (1). https://doi.org/10.7557/5.4266