Creating a cross-disciplinary hub for active student learning in the library
The card game
Keywords:library-faculty collaboration, 21st century skills, learning strategies
Two recent technology-driven tendencies in library-faculty collaboration – (1) embedding librarians in the online components of courses, and (2) repurposing certain library spaces to become makerspaces – often embrace the learning strategy of focusing on students as creators. Booth Library at Eastern Illinois University, in collaboration with a faculty-led Faculty Development office and a Humanities Center, has advanced both the leveraging of technology in learning and the creation of a library makerspace, and added a third component, (3) placing an active learning classroom (ALC) connected to a design lab as the first stage of a Center for Student Innovation (CSI). This process, grounded in research on learning spaces and universal design, had led us to ask: what space best encourages creativity in the learning process?
We propose to showcase a “think-pair-share” card game to demonstrate how we are re-centering the library as a center for knowledge creation, and a space for promoting discovery, in a format that invites Creating Knowledge participants to fine-tune our model or advance alternatives. That is, the library is building collaborations for re-thinking space, and re-positioning the library as central to teaching and learning, to foster 21st century skills around information, communication, and ethical/social impact. The card game will demonstrate ways to help students and faculty to create knowledge, and how information as a product is modeled, remodeled and reinterpreted for pedagogically creative teaching and learning. The implementation of the CSI has stimulated larger discussions in the library and across campus about the role of a “future-present” library. How can faculty and students embrace discovery as a means rather than an end? What role does the library play in facilitating teaching and learning? What does the future library look like? The presentation and card game will answer these questions through audience feedback and participation.
Students as Creators
Carmody, T. (2013). The Trouble with Digital Culture. In Cohen D. & Scheinfeldt T. (Eds.), Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities (pp. 163-164). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swj3.38Edmondson, Amy C. The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swj3.38
Embracing Failure: Building a Growth Mindset Through the Arts, 2016. https://www.edutopia.org/video/embracing-failure-building-growth-mindset-through-arts.
Lenz, Bob. “Failure Is Essential to Learning.” Edutopia, April 8, 2015. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/failure-essential-learning-bob-lenz
Madsen, Christine. “The Wrong Business for Libraries.” In Hacking the Academy, edited by Daniel J. Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt, 143–45. New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities. University of Michigan Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swj3.32
McMurtrie, Beth. “No Textbooks, No Lectures, and No Right Answers. Is This What Higher Education Needs?” Chronicle of Higher Education 65, no. 22 (February 15, 2019). https://proxy1.library.eiu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=135357200&site=ehost-live
Schulte, Jurgen, Belinda Tiffen, Jackie Edwards, Scott Abbott, and Edward Luca. “Shaping the Future of Academic Libraries: Authentic Learning for the Next Generation.” College & Research Libraries (C&RL) 79, no. (2018).
Smith, Shaunna, and Danah Henriksen. “Fail Again, Fail Better: Embracing Failure as a Paradigm for Creative Learning in the Arts.”Art Education 69, no. 2 (March 2016): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1141644
The Tech Rabbi. “Why Education Needs To Understand That Failure Is A Process Not A Destination,” August 2, 2017. https://thetechrabbi.com/blog/2017/7/30/failure
Barrett, Thomas, Matthew Pizzico, Bryan Levy, Robert Nagel, Julie Linsey, Kimberly Talley, Craig Forest, and Wendy Newstetter. “A Review of University Maker Spaces.” In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 26.101.1-26.101.17. Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences, 015. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23442
St. Amour, Madeline. “Students Trust Libraries for More than Borrowing Books, Report Says.” Inside Higher Ed, September 30, 2019. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/09/30/students-trust-libraries-more-borrowing-books-report-says
Vecchione, Amy. “Building Entrepreneurial Competencies in Library Staff: Getting Started.” PNLA Quarterly 82, no. 1 (February 2018). https://arc.lib.montana.edu/ojs/index.php/pnla/article/view/1100
———. “Designing Library Spaces.” Accessed November 29, 2019. https://works.bepress.com/amy_vecchione/83/.
Wong, Alia. “College Students Just Want Normal Libraries.” The Atlantic, October 4, 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2019/10/college-students-dont-want-fancy-libraries/599455/.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).