From Evaluated Outputs to Values-Embedded Practices

The Power of Focusing on Process in Scholarly Communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/5.5690

Keywords:

research evaluation, humanities and social sciences, HSS, HuMetricsHSS, values-based evaluation

Abstract

See RECORDING.

Currently, academia values what it can count: number of articles written, number of citations made, number of theses directed; number of euros or dollars received; in other words, it values what it can easily measure, and uses those numbers as a proxy for individual distinction within a competitive prestige economy. What if the individuals that make up the academic enterprise decided to focus on what we value, or purport to value (be that public scholarship, community engagement; openness and access; diversity, equity, and inclusion) instead? The HuMetricsHSS initiative promotes and supports one such alternative: a values-based, process-oriented approach to evaluative decision making in the academy, with a focus on the humanities and social sciences. Learn more about the history of the project, our current work, and our future plans in this talk.

Author Biography

  • Nicky Agate, University of Pennsylvania

    Nicky Agate is the Snyder-Granader Assistant University Librarian for Research Data & Digital Scholarship at the University of Pennsylvania and a co-PI on the HuMetricsHSS project. She holds a PhD in French Literature from New York University and an MFA in Literary Translation from the University of Iowa.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-17

How to Cite

Agate, N. (2020). From Evaluated Outputs to Values-Embedded Practices: The Power of Focusing on Process in Scholarly Communication. Septentrio Conference Series, (4). https://doi.org/10.7557/5.5690