Two decades of Open Access Campaigns

A Retrospective Analysis 

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/5.6641

Keywords:

Open Access, campaigns, BOAI, Open Science

Abstract

At the start of this century, the Open Access movement gained momentum, largely fuelled by the Budapest (2002), Berlin (2003), and Bethesda (2003) declarations. The past two decades further witnessed several advocacy campaigns that challenged excessive profiteering through scientific publication, and advocated for revolutionising the scholarly publication system. Several attempts have been made to raise a voice for researchers’ rights that have been swallowed by the commercial publishing model. This study aims to give an overview of some major campaigns and organisations advocating for open access and analyses their efforts through the lens of their objectives, outcomes, opportunities, challenges and achievements. The assessment reveals some missing pieces that require careful consideration especially for current and future advocacy campaigns, as they are key building blocks of the Open Science movement. Such a mapping and understanding is crucial for sketching effective strategies needed to accelerate the progress towards achieving genuine and universal open access.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Jenice Jean Goveas, International Science Council

Jenice Jean Goveas works in the areas of Science Diplomacy, Emerging Technologies, Science Advice, Open Science and Science Communication. Jenice is a Senior Campaign Manager for the Future of Scientific Publishing project. As part of the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India secretariat that is formulating India’s New Science Technology and Innovation Policy, she led many expert and public consultation activities. She has a Ph.D. in Nano Chemistry and served as an Assistant Professor in Chemistry for 9 years before transitioning to the field of science policy. She was the recipient of the International Network for Government Science Advice (INGSA) – Asia, grassroots Science Advice Promotion Awards 2021, and advocates for participatory science advice for policy-making.

Lizzie Sayer, International Science Council

Lizzie Sayer is Senior Communications Officer at the ISC. She joined the ISC from the International Social Science Council (ISSC), where she managed the publication of the 2016 World Social Science Report. Between 2013 and 2015 she worked in the interim Secretariat of Future Earth based at the International Council for Science (ICSU). She has a degree in languages, and first joined ICSU from a role in communications at the University of Oxford. She has also worked in events management and public policy research, with a focus on food and agricultural policy in the UK and Europe.

Megha Sud, International Science Council

Megha Sud joined ISC as Science Officer in 2019. She has previously worked as a policy analyst and programme officer at the OECD, the International Energy Agency and WWF. Her work has focussed on conducting interdisciplinary research and building networks to facilitate science-policy interface, with a particular interest in climate change, biodiversity and urban development. She holds a PhD in geography from the University of Cologne, an MA in development studies from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai and a BA in history from the University of Delhi.

References

Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Storms, G. (2016). On the cost of knowledge: Evaluating the boycott against Elsevier. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2016.00007

Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3

Tmava, A. M. (2022). Faculty Perceptions of Open Access Repositories: A Qualitative Analysis. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2082991

Moskovkin, V. M., Saprykina, T. V., Sadovski, M. V., & Serkina, O. V. (2021). International movement of open access to scientific knowledge: A quantitative analysis of country involvement. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102296

Khan, H., Almoli, E., Franco, M. C., & Moher, D. (2022). Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 144, 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.003

Meagher, K. (2021). Introduction: the politics of Open Access—decolonizing research or corporate capture?. Development and Change, 52(2), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12630

Downloads

Published

2022-11-14

How to Cite

Goveas, J. J., Sayer, L., & Sud, M. (2022). Two decades of Open Access Campaigns: A Retrospective Analysis . Septentrio Conference Series, (1). https://doi.org/10.7557/5.6641

Issue

No. 1 (2022): The 17th Munin Conference on Scholarly Publishing

Section

Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Jenice Jean Goveas, Lizzie Sayer, Megha Sud

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).