Open Science Infrastructure as a key component of Open Science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/5.6777

Keywords:

open science infrastructure, scholarly communication, open science, EOSC

Abstract

The Open Science movement is a response to the accumulated problems in scholarly communication, like the "reproducibility crisis", "serials crisis", and "peer review crisis". The European Commission defines priorities of Open Science as Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reproducible (FAIR) data, infrastructure and services in the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), Next generation metrics, altmetrics and rewards, the future of scientific communication, research integrity and reproducibility, education and skills and citizen science. Open Science Infrastructure is also one of four key components of Open Science defined by UNESCO.
Mainly represented among Open Science Infrastructures are institutional and thematic repositories for publications, research data, software and code. Furthermore, the Open Science Infrastructure services range may include discovery, mining, publishing, the peer review process, archiving and preservation, social networking tools, training, high-performance computing, and tools for processing and analysis. Successful Open Science Infrastructure should be based on community values and responsive to needed changes. Preferably the Open Science Infrastructure should be distributed, enabling machine-actionable tools and services, supporting reusability and reproducibility, quality FAIR data, interoperability, sustainability, long-term preservation and funding.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jadranka Stojanovski, University of Zadar / Ruđer Bošković Institute

Jadranka Stojanovski is an associate professor at the Department of Information Sciences at University of Zadar and research librarian at Ruđer Bošković Institute. She holds an MSc degree in physics and MSc and PhD in information sciences. 

References

Barker, M., Manola, N., Gaillard, V., Kuchma, I., Lazzeri, E., Stoy, L., & Piera, J. (2021). Digital skills for FAIR and open science: Report from the EOSC Executive Board Skills and Training Working Group. European Commission. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2777/59065

Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a

Bilder G, Lin J, Neylon C (2015) Principles for Open Scholarly Infrastructure. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1314859

Brembs, B., Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Susi, T., Siems, R., Perakakis, P., Trachana, V., Ma, L. & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2021). Replacing academic journals. Zenodo. DOI: https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.5793611.svg

Ficarra, V., Fosci, M., Chiarelli, A., Kramer, B., & Proudman, V.. (2020). Scoping the Open Science Infrastructure Landscape in Europe. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159838

Melanie Imming, & Jon Tennant. (2018). Sticker open science: just science done right (ENG). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285575

Khalil AT, Shinwari ZK and Islam A (2022) Fostering openness in open science: An ethical discussion of risks and benefits. Front. Polit. Sci. 4:930574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.930574

Leonelli, Sabina (2018) Re-Thinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality. [Preprint]: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14352/1/Reproducibility_2018_SL.pdf

Manola, N. (2017). e-infrastructures: The starting blocks for open science and innovation the OpenAIRE case. Paper presented at the Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 6 19-27.

Morais, R., Saenen, B., Garbuglia, F., Berghmans, S. and Gaillard, V. (2021). From principles to practices: Open Science at Europe’s universities 2020-2021 EUA Open Science Survey results. European University Association. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5062982

Peels, R. Replicability and replication in the humanities. Res Integr Peer Rev 4, 2 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0060-4

Plesser H.E. (2018) Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology. Front. Neuroinform. 11:76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00076

Ross-Hellauer T., Reichmann S., Cole N.L., Fessl A., Klebel T., Pontika N. (2022). Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 211032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211032

Sevkušić, M. (2020). Helping researchers handling APCs in Serbia. EIFL Blog. https://www.eifl.net/blogs/helping-researchers-handle-apcs-serbia

UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Sets Ambitious International Standards for Open Science. UNESCO press release 2021-128, November 25, 2021. Available online at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-sets-ambitious-international-standards-open-science

Downloads

Published

2022-11-22

How to Cite

Stojanovski, J. (2022). Open Science Infrastructure as a key component of Open Science. Septentrio Conference Series, (1). https://doi.org/10.7557/5.6777