Who Edits Reality? The Politics and Pragmatics of Scholarly Infrastructure

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/5.8292

Keywords:

bibliographic databases, corpora, Digital Humanities, representation, infrastructure, governance

Abstract

This paper argues that digital scholarly infrastructures, such as bibliographic databases and text corpora, are not neutral representations of reality but constructed models shaped by pragmatic, methodological choices. This is particularly critical in the "closing world" of proprietary platforms like Scopus and Web of Science, which present biased commercial products as objective scholarly tools. Through a critical discussion, this paper unpacks how unexamined decisions regarding operationalisation, standardisation, representativeness, and balance can distort our understanding of a scholarly field. In contrast, the paper highlights collaborative, open data ecosystems that leverage standardisation and interoperability. Ultimately, we argue that fostering a multiplicity of open, auditable models is essential to challenge the monolithic power of commercial actors, democratize research, and achieve genuine data sovereignty.

Author Biography

References

Bode, K. (2018). A world of fiction: Digital collections and the future of literary history. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Maddi, A., Maisonobe, M., & Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C. (2025). Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS. PLOS ONE, 20(4), e0320347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320347

Stachowiak, H. (1973). Allgemeine Modelltheorie [General model theory]. Springer-Verlag.

Published

2025-10-08

How to Cite

Maryl, M. (2025). Who Edits Reality? The Politics and Pragmatics of Scholarly Infrastructure. Septentrio Conference Series, (2). https://doi.org/10.7557/5.8292

Funding data