Who Edits Reality? The Politics and Pragmatics of Scholarly Infrastructure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/5.8292Keywords:
bibliographic databases, corpora, Digital Humanities, representation, infrastructure, governanceAbstract
This paper argues that digital scholarly infrastructures, such as bibliographic databases and text corpora, are not neutral representations of reality but constructed models shaped by pragmatic, methodological choices. This is particularly critical in the "closing world" of proprietary platforms like Scopus and Web of Science, which present biased commercial products as objective scholarly tools. Through a critical discussion, this paper unpacks how unexamined decisions regarding operationalisation, standardisation, representativeness, and balance can distort our understanding of a scholarly field. In contrast, the paper highlights collaborative, open data ecosystems that leverage standardisation and interoperability. Ultimately, we argue that fostering a multiplicity of open, auditable models is essential to challenge the monolithic power of commercial actors, democratize research, and achieve genuine data sovereignty.
References
Bode, K. (2018). A world of fiction: Digital collections and the future of literary history. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maddi, A., Maisonobe, M., & Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C. (2025). Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS. PLOS ONE, 20(4), e0320347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320347
Stachowiak, H. (1973). Allgemeine Modelltheorie [General model theory]. Springer-Verlag.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maciej Maryl

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Grant numbers BNI/PST/2023/1/00165