Muitalusaid mearkkašupmi otná servodagas: Sámi lágaid ozus narratiiva láhkametoda bokte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.7368Keywords:
sámi láhka, eamiálbmotláhka, sámi muitalusat, láhkaprinsihpat, mánáidsuodjalus, gufihttarat, njálmmálaš árbevierru, Sámi law, Indigenous law, Sámi stories, legal principles, child protection, gufihtars (underground people), oral traditionAbstract
Artihkal guorahallá sámi lága ja láhkaprinsihpaid narratiiva láhkametoda vehkiin Gufihttara lonuhus -muitalusa vuođul. Narratiiva láhkametoda leaba hábmen eamiálbmotlága dutkit Val Napoleon ja Hadley Friedland, ja dat lea geavahuvvon viidát Kanadas maŋimuš nuppelogi jagi. Artihkkala ulbmil lea ovddidit eamiálbmotláhkadutkamuša Sámis ja sámi lágaid guorahallama servodaga ja árbbi siskkobealde, ovdanbuktit sámedutkamuššii metoda, man eará eamiálbmotlágaid dutkit leat geavahan buriin ja mávssolaš bohtosiin, ja kártet Gufihttara lonuhus ‑muitalusa lágaid ja láhkaprinsihpaid. Artihkkala loahpas suokkardan mo gávdnon láhkaprinsihpaid sáhttá geavahit otná servodathástalusaid čoavdimis dego mánáidsuodjalusas, ja makkár áššiid váldit vuhtii, jos sámedutkamušas háliidit joatkit narratiiva láhkametoda geavaheami gávdnan dihtii sámiid iežaset lágaid ja láhkaprinsihpaid. Sámis gávdnojit dutkamušat sámi dáhpelágas, sámiid vieruid ja njuolggadusaid rollas nationála lágain ja láhkaásaheamis ja das mo gearretmearrádusat leat váldán vuhtii sámi dáhpelága, muhto narratiiva láhkametoda ii leat ovdal geavahuvvon sámi muitalusaid analyseremis ja sámi lágaid gávdnamis.
English title: The Significance of Stories in Contemporary Society: Seeking Sámi Laws through an Indigenous Law Method
English abstract:
This article investigates Sámi law and legal principles in the traditional story of Gufihttara lonuhus with the help of the Indigenous narrative legal method. Developed by Indigenous law scholars Val Napoleon and Hadley Friedland, the narrative legal method has been widely employed in Canada in the past two decades. The objectives of the article are: to advance Indigenous law research in Sápmi and the analysis of Sámi laws within Sámi society and tradition; to introduce a new method for Sámi research that has been successfully used in Indigenous scholarship; and to identify the laws and legal principles in the well-known Sámi story of Gufihttara lonuhus. At the end of the article, I examine the ways in which the identified legal principles can be employed to address current challenges in Sámi society such as child protection, and what needs to be taken into account if the Indigenous narrative legal method will be employed to identify Sámi people’s own laws and principles. While there are studies on Sámi customary law, the way in which court decisions have taken Sámi customary law into consideration, and the role of traditional Sámi customs and norms in national legislation, the Indigenous narrative legal method has not yet been employed to analyze traditional Sámi oral tradition and identifying Sámi laws therein.
Metrics
References
Allard, Christina 2015: Some characteristic features of Scandinavian laws and their influence on Sami matters. – Christina Allard & Susann Funderud Skogvang (doaimm.), Indigenous rights in Scandinavia. Autonomous Sami law. Farnham: Ashgate. 49–64.
Allard, Christina & Skogvang, Susann Funderud (doaimm.) 2015: Indigenous rights in Scandinavia. Autonomous Sami law. Farnham: Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315588353
Archibald, Jo-ann 1997: Coyote learns to make a storybasket: The place of First Nations stories in education. [Doavttirgrádabargu.] Simon Fraser University.
Asch, Michael & Macklem, Patrick 1991: Aboriginal rights and Canadian sovereignty: an essay on R. v. Sparrow. – Alberta Law Review 29 (2): 498–517. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1571
Austin, Raymond D. 2009: Navajo courts and Navajo common law. A tradition of tribal self-governance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bankes, Nigel & Koivurova, Timo (doaimm.) 2013: The proposed Nordic Saami Convention. National and international dimensions of indigenous property rights. Oxford: Hart.
Bengtsson, Bertil 2004: Samerätt. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
Berg, Thorleif (doaimm.) 1986: Muitalusat, máidnasat ja cukcasat. Kárášjohka: Davvi Media.
Borrows, John 2002: Recovering Canada. The resurgence of Indigenous law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Borrows, John 2010: Canada’s Indigenous constitution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bull, Kirsti Strøm 2004: Saami customary law and the proposals of the Saami Rights Committee. – Michael Jones & Audhild Schanche (doaimm.), Landscape, law and customary rights. Dieđut 3/2004. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta. 163–171.
Christie, Gordon 2009: Indigenous legal theory: Some initial considerations. – Benjamin J Richardson, Shin Imai & Kent McNeil (doaimm.), Indigenous peoples and the law: Comparative and critical perspectives. Oxford: Hart. 195–231. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955565.ch-008
Eriksen, Gunnar 2004: Samiske sedvaner og bruk av naturressurser før og etter Selbu- og Svartskogdommene fra 2001. – Kritisk juss 30: 289–304. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2387-4546-2004-03-09
Eriksen, Gunnar 2008: Alders tids bruk. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Fletcher, Matthew L.M. 2006: Toward a theory of intertribal and intratribal common law. – Houston Law Review 43 (3): 701–741.
Friedland, Hadley 2012: Practical engagement with Indigenous traditions on environmental issues: Some questions. A Symposium on Environment in the Courtroom: Key Environmental Concepts and the Unique Nature of Environmental Damage, March 23–24, University of Calgary.
Friedland, Hadley 2018: The Wetiko legal principles: Cree and Anishinabek responses to violence and victimization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Friedland, Hadley & Napoleon, Val 2015–2016: Gathering the threads: Developing a methodology for researching and rebuilding Indigenous legal traditions. – Lakehead Law Journal 1 (1): 16–44.
Glenn, H. Patrick 2014: Legal traditions of the world. Sustainable diversity in law. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199669837.001.0001
Helander, Elina 2004: Samiska rättsuppfatningar. Rovaniemi: Arctic Centre.
Helander-Renvall, Elina 2013: Saamelainen tapaoikeus. – Päivi Magga & Eija Ojanlatva (doaimm.), Ealli biras. Saamelainen kulttuuriympäristöohjelma. Inari: Sámi museum / Saamelaismuseosäätiö. 132–134.
Henderson, James [sákéj] Youngblood 1994: Empowering treaty federalism. – Saskatchewan Law Review 58 (2): 241–329.
Hågvar, Geir 2006: Den samiske rettsdannelse i indre Finnmark. Om nordsamenes rettsorden, grunnlovsvernet og selvbestemmelsen. Dieđut 2/2006. Guovdageaidnu: Sami Instituhtta.
Korpijaakko, Kaisa 1989: Saamelaisten oikeusasemasta Ruotsi-Suomessa. Oikeushistoriallinen tutkimus Länsi-Pohjan Lapin maankäyttöoloista ja -oikeuksista ennen 1700-luvun puoliväliä. Helsinki: Lakimiesliiton kustannus.
Kuokkanen, Rauna 2022: All I see is white. The colonial problem in Finland. – Josephine Hoegaerts, Tuire Liimatainen, Laura Hekanaho & Elizabeth Peterson (doaimm.), Finnishness, Whiteness and Coloniality. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press. 291–314. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-17-12
Labba, Kristina 2020: Sámi law: A methodological approach. – Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11: 215–232. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2431
Lawrence, Rebecca & Åhrén, Mattias 2016: Mining as colonisation: the need for restorative justice and restitution of traditional Sami lands. – Lesley Head, Katarina Saltzman, Gunhild Setten & Marie Stenseke (doaimm.), Nature, temporality and environmental management: Scandinavian and Australian perspectives on landscapes and peoples. New York: Routledge. 133–148.
Magga, Ole Henrik & Oskal, Nils & Sara, Mikkel Nils 2002: Dyrevelferd i samisk kultur. Kautokeino: Sámi allaskuvla.
Milward, David 2012: Aboriginal justice and the charter. Realizing a culturally sensitive interpretation of legal rights. Vancouver: UBC Press. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774824583
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade 2003: Genealogies of community, home, and nation. – Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Feminism without borders. Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham & London: Duke University Press. 124–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smp7t.9
Napoleon, Val 2013: Thinking about Indigenous legal orders. – René Provost & Colleen Sheppard (doaimm.), Dialogues on human rights and legal pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4_11
Napoleon, Val 2019: Did I break it? Recording Indigenous (customary) law. – Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 22: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7588
Napoleon, Val & Friedland, Hadley 2014: Indigenous legal traditions: Roots to Renaissance. – Markus D. Dubber & Tatjana Hörnle (doaimm.), The Oxford handbook of criminal law. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 225–247.
Oskal, Nils & Sara, Mikkel Nils 2001: Reindriftssamiske sedvaner og rettsoppfatninger om land. Reindriften i Finnmark. Oslo: Cappelens forlag.
Ravna, Øyvind 2013: Finnmarksloven – og retten til jorden i Finnmark. Oslo: Gyldendal.
Riessman, Catherine Kohler 1993: Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ross, Rupert 1996: Returning to the teachings. Exploring Aboriginal justice. Toronto: Penguin.
Skogvang, Susann Funderud 2012: Retten til fiske i fjorder og kystnære farvann. Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø.
Skogvang, Susann Funderud 2017: Samerett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Smith, Carstein 2004: Hvilken plass har samiske sedvaner og rettsoppfatninger i norsk rett? – Jussens venner 39 (3–4): 137–143. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3126-2004-03-04-01
Solbakk, Aage 2009: What we believe in. Noaidevuohta – an introduction to the religion of the Northern Saami. Kárášjohka: ČálliidLágádus.
Solem, Erik 1970: Lappiske rettstudier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Sterling, Shirley 1997: The grandmother stories: Oral tradition and the transmission of culture. [Doavttirgrádabargu.] University of British Columbia.
Svensson, Eva-Maria 2015: Sami legal scholarship: The making of a knowledge field. – Christina Allard & Susann Funderud Skogvang (doaimm.), Indigenous rights in Scandinavia. Autonomous Sami law. Farnham: Ashgate. 207–226.
Svensson, Tom G. (doaimm.) 1999: On customary law and the Saami rights process in Norway. Proceedings from a conference at University of Tromsø, Feb. 1999. Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø.
Torp, Eivind 2011: Betydelsen av samiska traditioner i svensk rätt. – Arctic Review on Law and Politics 2 (1): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v2.20
Trinh, T. Minh-ha. 1989: Woman, native, other. Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
Tully, James 1995: Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170888
Turi, Johan 1987 [1910]: Muitalus sámiid birra. Johkamohkki: Sámi Girjjit.
Webber, Jeremy 1995: Relations of force, relations of justice: The emergence of normative community between colonies and Aboriginal peoples. – Osgood Hall Law Journal 33 (4): 623–660. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1636
Webber, Jeremy 2009: The grammar of customary law. – McGill Law Journal 54 (4): 579–626. https://doi.org/10.7202/039646ar
Åhrén, Mattias 2016: Indigenous peoples’ status in the international legal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778196.001.0001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rauna Kuokkanen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.