What Makes an MMORPG Leader? A Social Cognitive Theory-Based Approach to Understanding the Formation of Leadership Capabilities in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games

Authors

  • Andrew Ee
  • Hichang Cho National University of Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6136

Abstract

Using Bandura’s (1986) Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and McCormick’s (2001) SCT-applied models of leadership, we aimed to understand the complex processes of leadership development in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPG) environments. Using in-depth interview data from 20 Singaporean World of Warcraft players, we examined how environmental factors (e.g. game design, communication, and collaboration structures), personal factors (e.g. self-efficacy), and gaming behaviour affect the development of leadership capabilities. The findings suggest that Bandura’s and McCormick’s frameworks are useful in explaining how these factors contribute to leadership development, with some examples including: 1) game designs that allow for formalised leadership roles can create better opportunities for leadership development, and 2) self-efficacy, an important trait for leadership development, can be cultivated through confidence gained by reinforcing knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) through repeated application of these KSAs in similar situations. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Author Biography

Hichang Cho, National University of Singapore

Associate Professor

Department of Communications and New Media

Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences

National University of Singapore

Downloads

Published

2012-05-25

How to Cite

Ee, A. and Cho, H. (2012) “What Makes an MMORPG Leader? A Social Cognitive Theory-Based Approach to Understanding the Formation of Leadership Capabilities in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games”, Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 6(1), pp. 25–37. doi: 10.7557/23.6136.

Issue

Section

Perspectives

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
7%
33%
Days to publication 
189
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Septentrio Academic Publishing