Painting the Mona Lisa?

How reusable and open methods and protocols can advance reproducibility

Authors

Keywords:

reproducubility, open methods, protocols sharing, methods sharing

Abstract

Would Leonardo da Vinci have shared the precise methods behind his masterpieces? Would he guide us step by step through his process to recreate the enigmatic smile of the Mona Lisa? While art often celebrates the elusive and irreplicable touch of genius, contemporary science expects and relies on reproducibility to maintain trust and rigor. More than a decade has passed since the reproducibility crisis was first diagnosed, yet progress in addressing this issue has been gradual and unevenly distributed (Korbmacher, M. et al, 2023). Researchers are increasingly required to produce detailed data management plans and to ensure that their data is findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). However, questions often overlooked in the quest for FAIR data include: Where do the data come from, and how were they generated (Weissgerber, T. et al, 2024)? Detailed methods reporting enhances the value of shared data and makes replication of results more efficient, reducing research waste while also fostering a more equitable research culture, ensuring that up-to-date methods are available to all (LaFlamme, M, 2024).

Workshop objectives

This workshop will explore how stakeholders within the research science ecosystem can advance reproducibility by encouraging the uptake of methods and protocols sharing. Drawing on a recent set of recommendations from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, we will spark a meaningful dialogue around translating these recommendations into practice across the scientific community (European Commission et al, 2024). By engaging participants in problem-solving and role-playing exercises, we will consider dilemmas and tradeoffs that may stand in the way of a more responsible, reproducible research culture.

Workshop Structure
  • Role-Playing Group Activities: Participants will be divided into groups, each presented with a real-life scenario related to methods and protocols sharing. Participants will assume different roles, such as a researcher, a department head, a librarian, or a funder. Within their respective groups, participants will:
    • Discuss potential strategies to advance reproducibility within their assigned roles.
    • Identify challenges (e.g., incentives and/or disincentives) and propose practical action plans to address them.
    • Develop tools and communication strategies tailored to their stakeholder group.
  • Group Presentations: Each group will present their scenario and proposed actions, explaining how they developed their approach.
  • Synthesis: The workshop will conclude with a collaborative session where participants will discuss common challenges surfaced by the scenarios and collectively identify the most effective approaches to overcome them. Participants will be encouraged to state practical, tangible steps they will take after the workshop to promote methods and protocols sharing in their organizations.

Target Audience: This workshop is designed for anyone who is committed to advancing reproducibility in scientific research. We hope that attendees from the stakeholder groups mentioned above will participate.

Author Biographies

Agata Morka, PLOS

Agata holds a PhD in art history from the University of Washington and has spent the past 13 years advancing Open Science practices, particularly in open access publishing. She has contributed to projects like COPIM, DIAMAS, and PALOMERA, and helped develop the Open Access Books Network. Currently, she serves as the Regional Director of Publishing Development for Europe at PLOS.

Emma Ganley, protocols.io

Emma started as a researcher undertaking both PhD and post-doc before switching gears and working as an Editor for some 15 or so years (initially at PLOS Biology, then Executive Editor at The Journal of Cell Biology, before returning to PLOS Biology where she eventually served as Chief Editor). In more recent years, Emma joined protocols.io as Director of Strategic Initiatives in a position that has switched her focus from Open Access and Open Data to Open Methods.

Leo Lahti, University of Turku

Leo Lahti is a professor in Data Science at the University of Turku, Finland. His research team focuses on computational analysis of complex natural and social systems. He is an executive committee member in the International Science Council's Committee on Data (CODATA) and its Data Ethics Task Group, and vice chair of the Finnish National Coordination on open science. Lahti led the development of the National Policy on Open Access to Research Methods in Finland.

Rebecca Kirk, PLOS

Rebecca Kirk is the Associate Editorial Director at PLOS, helping to keep PLOS at the forefront of open science publishing and trusted content. She holds a PhD in Biochemistry from University College London, and has since worked in editorial and publishing roles developing open access journals, open science solutions, and innovative publishing models to support the needs of the global research community.

References

Korbmacher, M., Azevedo, F., Pennington, C.R. et al. The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes. Commun Psychol 1, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2

Weissgerber, T.L., Gazda, M.A., Nilsonne, G. et al. Understanding the provenance and quality of methods is essential for responsible reuse of FAIR data. Nat Med 30, 1220–1221 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02879-x

LaFlamme, M. Improving Methods Reporting in the Life Sciences, Scholarly Kitchen (2024)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Batista Leite, S., Brooke, M., Carusi, A. et al., Promoting reusable and open methods and protocols (PRO-MaP) – Recommendations to improve methodological clarity in life sciences publications, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/46124

Published

2024-09-16

How to Cite

Morka, A., Ganley, E., Lahti, L., & Kirk, R. (2024). Painting the Mona Lisa? : How reusable and open methods and protocols can advance reproducibility. Septentrio Conference Series, (1). Retrieved from https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SCS/article/view/7763