Máŋggakultuvrralašvuođa oahpu sámáidahttin Sámi allaskuvllas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.8627Čoahkkáigeasut
In this article, we examine our experiences of carrying out – and teaching for about ten years – a course called Multicultural Understanding (in Sami máŋggakultuvrralaš áddejupmi, MKÁ) in the Sámi University College. We focus on the way of working in the course in which the emphasis is on the position and the telling of stories. We also analyze how this method has contributed to the students learning process. Furthermore, we assess how this way of working influences the conditions of learning and look at how we can change and improve the education.
The article shows that the enhancing of cultural sensitivity and an analytic way of thinking are central elements of the course on multicultural understanding. It also shows that this approach makes the experiences and feelings of the students themselves visible, because – compared with ordinary courses – the course gives them ‘more room’. This way of working entails that the students can express their experiences through stories. The stories have provided content for the course and connected it with relevant and topical discussions in society. Often, they have also served as a beginning for the papers that students have written in connection with more comprehensive project work. Narration plays, of course, a central role in Sami heritage and this article also examines whether, through the approach of the course and the provision of a learning opportunity, we have created a Sami learning environment, or “a shared room”, which contributes to human selfimprovement, analytical cultural understanding and good reflective skills in the students.
While reflecting on this education, we realized that the course needs to have an even stronger indigenous perspective, which deals with power relations and the effect of colonisation but also focuses on recovery. The education could be reformed to include the learning process of decolonisation, for which indigenous researchers have developed methodologies. It may contain elements that could be used in our course on multicultural understanding, to promote the empowerment of the Sami and other indigenous peoples.
Referánssat
Balto, Asta 1997: Sámi mánáidbajásgeassin nuppástuvvá. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
Balto, Asta Mitkijá 2008: Sámi oahpaheaddjit sirdet árbevirolaš kultuvrra boahttevaš buolvvaide. Dekoloniserema akšuvdnadutkamuš Ruoŧabeale Sámis. Dieđut 4/2008. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi allaskuvla.
Barth, Fredrik 1994: Manifistasjon og prosess. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.
Battiste, Marie (doaim.) 2000: Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Dahl, Øyvind 2001: Møter mellom menneske: interkulturell kommunikasjon. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
Eidheim, Harald - Stordahl, Vigdis 1998: Kulturmøte og terapi i Sápmi. Kárášjohka/Karasjok: Davvi Girji OS.
Gullestad, Marianne 2002: Det norske sett med nye øyne. Oslo: Universitets forlaget.
Halvorsen, Else Marie 2004: Kulturforståelse, kulturprocesser, identitet. – Guttorm, Gunvor – Sandven, Jostein (doaim.), Sløjden, minoritetene, det flerkulturelle og et internasjonalt perspektiv. Techneserien, Forskning i slöjdpedagogik och slöjdvetenskap B:13/2004. NordFo – Nordiskt Forum för Forskning och Utvecklingsarbete. Høg skolen i Telemark, Avdelningen for estetiske fag, folkekultur og lærerutdanning.
Höem, Anton 1978: Kunnskapsoverføring som et sosialt fenomen. – Monsen et al (doaim.), Kunnskapssosiologi og skoleutvikling. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Høgmo, Asle (1986): Det tredje alternativ. Barns læring av identitets for valtning i samisknorske samfunn preget av identitets skifte. – Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning bd. 27, s. 395–416.
Høgmo, Asle 1998: Fremmed i det norske hus. Innvandreres møte med bygde samfunn, småby og storby. Oslo: Notam Gyldendal.
Illeris, Knud 1981: Modkvalifiseringens pædagogik – problemorientering. Deltakerstyring og eksemplarisk indlæring. København: Unge Pædagoger.
Kuokkanen, Rauna 2000: Towards an «Indigenous Paradigm» from a Sami Perspective. –Canadian Journal of Native Studies 20: 2, s. 411–436.
Kvernmo, Siv - Stordahl, Vigdis 1990: Fra same til akademiker = fra deltaker til observatør. – Sami Medica nr. 1, s. 4–10.
Laursen, Per Fibæk 1997: Refleksivitet i didaktikken. – Jens Christian Jacobsen (doaim.), Refleksive læreprocesser s. 60–78. København: Forlaget Politisk Revy.
Nergård, Jens Ivar 2006: Den levende erfaring: en studie i samisk kunnskapstradisjon. Oslo: Cappelen akademisk.
Sara, Mikkel Nils 2003: Sámi máhtut oahpahusas ja oahpponeavvuin – Vuokko Hirvonen (doaim.), Sámi skuvla plánain ja praktihkas s. 121–138. Kárášjohka: ČálliidLágádus.
Smith, Linda Thuiwai 1999: Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
Stordahl, Vigdis 1996: Same i den moderne verden. Endring og kontiuitet i et samisk lokalsamfunn. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji O.S.
Stordahl, Vigdis 2008: Nation building through knowledge building: the dis course of sami higher education and research in Norway. – Minde, Henry (doaim.), Indigenous Peoples: Self-determination Knowledge Indigenity s. 249–266. Delft: Eburon.
Tiller, Tom 1999: Aksjonslæring: forskende partnerskap i skolen. Kristiansand: Høgskoleforlaget.
Ziehe, Thomas 1978: Subjektiv betydning og erfaring: Om Glockseeskole for søgets didaktiske koncept. – Kontext nr. 35, s. 82–98.