“You Are Dead. Continue?”: Conflicts and Complements in Game Rules and Fiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/23.5981Abstract
Videogames may be the only narrative medium in which the death of the protagonist is entirely routine. This is not an inherent bias of the form, but a potentially problematic convention left over from a time when it only made sense to look at games from a rules-based perspective. Now, as game designers become more ambitious with the sorts of stories they can tell, the “die-and-retry” approach presents an impediment to fictional coherence and enjoyment of story. This article proposes that players are more interested in enjoying games for their narrative elements than some developers and theorists recognize, and considers how a number of contemporary games have been designed to reduce conflicting elements and increase complementary elements between game rules and game fiction.Publication Facts
Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers
0
2.4
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability
N/A
16%
External funding
No
32%
Competing interests
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted
12%
33%
Days to publication
409
145
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Septentrio Academic Publishing
Published
2008-09-21
How to Cite
Tocci, J. (2008) “‘You Are Dead. Continue?’: Conflicts and Complements in Game Rules and Fiction”, Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 2(2), pp. 187–201. doi: 10.7557/23.5981.
Issue
Section
Articles