What information structure tells us about individual/stage-level predicates

Angel Jiménez-Fernández

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/


individual-level predicates; stage-level predicates; copulas; small clause; central-coincidence prepositions; terminal coincidence prepositions; topic; specificity; subextraction


The goal of this paper is to explore the lexical-syntactic structure of copulative constructions and argument small clauses within the framework proposed by Gallego & Uriagereka (2011) for the Individual-Level/Stage-Level distinction (Carlson 1988, Kratzer 1995) and implement their theory by claiming that there is a crucial correlation between IL/SL constructions and their information structure. I argue that IL subjects are topics (and hence this is a categorical construction, following Kuroda 1972, Milsark 1977 and Raposo & Uriagereka 1995), whereas in SL constructions the topic may either be the subject or a silent spatiotemporal argument (their construction being thetic). I show the topic nature of IL subjects in contexts of specificity and subextraction. I ultimately derive the IS of IL/SL constructions from their lexical-syntactic structure and identify the type of topic here as an Aboutness-Topic (in the sense of Frascarelli & Hinterhölzl 2007, Lambrecht 1994, Erteschik-Shir 1997).

Keywords: individual-level/stage-level predicates, copulas, small clause, central-coincidence/terminal coincidence prepositions, topic, specificity, subextraction


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 Angel Jiménez-Fernández

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/