Superlative syntactic amalgams in an Iberian Spanish dialect


  • Luis Ángel Sáez del Álamo



superlatives, syntactic amalgams, relatives, sluicing, pair-merge


This article addresses an as yet unnoticed Spanish superlative construction attested in the mid area of Northern Spain. This construction features two striking properties: (i) it contains a relative pronoun which, at first glance, does not seem to introduce a TP (there is no overt verb to its right), which raises the question how the relative pronoun can obtain its Case/theta role; (ii) even if it were true that the relative pronoun actually introduces a TP and heads a full subordinate clause (presumably a free relative), the latter would arise in an anomalous position which disrupts the natural word order of the main clause and where it seems to lack any obvious licensor (as an adjunct, argument or predicate). A simultaneous answer to both problems will be obtained from the proposal that the construction at issue is a “syntactic amalgam” (Lakoff 1974): (i) assuming Kluck’s (2011) approach to amalgams, the relative pronoun of the construction can unproblematically be considered to introduce a sluiced TP, so it heads a full relative clause and does have a (covert) Case/theta-role licensor; (ii) the disruptive position of the relative clause and the opacity for licensing from the main clause are now expected as they are the defining properties of the so-called “interrupting clauses” in Horn-/Andrews-amalgams. As in Kluck (2011), such properties will be assumed to result from the operation “par-merge” giving rise to paratactical configurations (de Vries 2007).


Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin, de Gruyter Mouton.

Bianchi, V. (2000). The raising analysis of relative clauses: a reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31, pp 123-140.

Bosque, I. & J. M. Brucart (1991). QP-Raising in Spanish superlatives, Ms. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Citko, B. (2020). On Top but not a Phase: phasehood inheritance and variation in sluicing, In J. van Craenenbroeck et al (eds) Recent Developments in Phase Theory, pp. 35-58.

Contreras Monzón, C., D. Ott & D. Siddiqi (2020). Ellipsis where *(you don’t expect it): Sluicing in free relative clauses in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at the West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics 38, The University of British Columbia.

Craenenbroeck, J. van (2017). Sluicing as sharing. In N. LaCara et al. (eds.) A Schrift to Fest Kyle Johnson. Linguistics Open Access Publications 1. Massachusetts: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, pp. 389-399.

Craenenbroeck, J. van A. Lipták (2006). The crosslinguistic syntax of sluicing: evidence from hungarian relatives. Syntax 9, pp. 248-274.

Griffiths, J. (2015). Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers and constituent modification. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33, pp. 191-229.

Grosu, A. (2003). A Unified Theory of `Standard' and `Transparent' Free Relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, pp. 247-331.

Guimaraes, M. (2004). Derivation and representation of syntactic amalgams. Dissertation, University of Maryland.

Hackl, M. (2009). On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half. Natural language Semantics 17, pp. 63-98.

Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Heim, I. (1999). Notes on Superlatives. Ms. MIT.

Johnson, K. (2012). Towards deriving differences in how Wh Movement and QR are Pronounced. Lingua 122, pp. 529–553.

Johnson, K. (2013). Licensing ellipsis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34, pp. 71-98.

Johnson, K. (2014). Recoverability of Deletion. In K. Nasukawa et al (eds.) Identity Relations in Grammar, Studies in Generative Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Kluck, M. (2011). Sentence Amalgamation. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.

Kluck, M. (2014). A sluicing account of amalgams. Ms., University of Groningen.

Lakoff, G. (1974). Syntactic amalgams. In Michael W. La Galy et al (eds.) Papers from the 10th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 321-344.

Lipták, A. & E. O. Aboh (2013). Sluicing inside relatives. The case of Gungbe. Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp. 102-118.

Lipták, A. (2015). Relative pronouns as sluicing remnants. In K. Kiss et al (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187-207.

Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. Oxord: Oxford University Press.

Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Potts, C. (2005). The Logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Riemsdijk, H. van (2006). Towards a unified theory of wh- and non-wh amalgams. In Y. Suzuki et al (eds.) In search of the essence of language science: festschrift for Professor Heizo Nakajima on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo, pp. 43–59. .

Rohena-Madrazo, M. (2007). Superlative Movement in Puerto Rican Spanish and General Spanish. New York University Working Papers in Linguistics.

Schwarzschild, R. (1999). Givenness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7, pp. 141-177.

Šimík, R. (2020). Doubling unconditionals and relative sluicing. Natural Language Semantics 28, pp. 1–21.

Szabolcsi, A. (1986), Comparative superlatives. In N. Fukui et al (eds.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, pp. 245-266.

Vries, M. de (2007). Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In N. Dehé et al (eds.) Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 203-234.

Vries, M. de (2011). Unconventional mergers. In M. Uribe-Etxebarria & V. Valmala (eds.) Ways os structure building. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143- 166.

Wurmbrand, S. (2017). Stripping and topless complements. Linguistic Inquiry 48, pp. 341-366.




How to Cite

Sáez del Álamo, L. Ángel. (2020). Superlative syntactic amalgams in an Iberian Spanish dialect. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 9(2), 113–132.