Correlations between Case and the D-system  and the interpretability of Case

Txuss Martin; Ioanna Sitaridou; Wolfram Hinzen

doi:10.7557/1.10.2.6252

Authors

Txuss Martin University of Cambridge
Ioanna Sitaridou University of Cambridge
Wolfram Hinzen ICREA/University Pompeu Fabra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/1.10.2.6252

Keywords:

Case, D, Clitics, Reference, Definiteness

Abstract

A correlation between articles and Case has long been noted based on diachronic evidence. Beyond articles, evidence supports that this correlation extends further to clitics and the determiner system (the D-system) at large. The D-system in turn supports referential functions in grammar and is closely correlated to Person. The aim of the present article is to link support for these facts to the broader foundational question and independent recent theories of the function of Case as governing referential meaning in grammar at the level of clauses. This link is supported by specific evidence from the use of Accusative and Partitive clitics in Romance, which play the same roles strong Accusative vs. weak Partitive Case play in Finnish, which lacks articles, and similar patterns in languages such as Turkish, Russian, and Latin. Case therefore arguably determines the referential function of (pro-) nominals as part of event structures, whether synthetically or else analytically via the left periphery of the NP. This explains the historical links between Case and the D-system, which we further argue evidence from Greek has been incorrectly argued to contravene.

References

Abney, S. (1987) The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD Diss: Massa-chusetts Institute of Technology.

Abraham, W. (1997) The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the histo-ry of German: the case of verbal genitive. In van Kamenade |& Vincent (eds.) Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Adger, D. & D. Harbour (2008) Why Phi. In Harbour, Adger & Béjar (eds.) Phi Theory. Phi-Features Across Modules and Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-34.

Arsenijević, B. & W. Hinzen (2012) On the absence of X-within-X recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 423-440.https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00095 https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00095

Baker, J. (2014) Aspects of the evolution of the Latin/Romance verbal system. MPhil thesis: University of Cambridge.

Barwise, J. & R. Cooper (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguis-tics and Philosophy 4: 159–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139

Behaghel, O. (1923) Deutsche Syntax. Heidelberg

Belletti, A. (1988) The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34.

Benveniste, É. (1966) Être et avoir dans leur fonction linguistique. In Problèmes de lin-guistique générale. Paris: Gallimard, 187-207.

Boeckx, C. & T. Martin (2012) El clític datiu és més que un clític. Lleida: Pagès.

Boskovic, Z. (1995) Case properties of clauses and the Greed Principle. Studia Linguistica 49: 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1995.tb00464.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1995.tb00464.x

Caha, P. (2009) The nanosyntax of case. PhD Diss.: Universitetet Tromsø.

Calabrese, A. (1998) Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance. In Lema & Treviño (eds.) Theoretical Advances on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71-126. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.157.06cal https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.157.06cal

Cardinaletti, A. & M. Starke (1999) The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.) Clitics in the Lan-guages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton, 145-233. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145

Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001) Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.

Chomsky, N. (2008) On Phases. In Freidin et al. (eds) Foundational Issues in Linguis-tic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133-166. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007

Corr, A. (2021) The Grammar of the Utterance. How to Do Things with Ibero-Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Danesi, S. & J. Barðdal (2018) Where does the modality of Ancient Greek modal verbs come from? Journal of Greek Linguistics 18: 45-92. https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01801005 https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01801005

Danon, G. (2006) Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 977-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9005-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9005-6

Déchaine, R.-M. & M. Wiltschko (2002) Decomposing Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409-442. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168554 https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168554

de Hoop, H. (1996) Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. New York, NY: Garland.

Den Dikken, M. (2011) Phi-feature inflection and agreement: An introduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 857-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9156-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9156-y

Diesing, M. (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dixon, R. (1979) Ergativity. Language 55: 59-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/412519 https://doi.org/10.2307/412519

Eide, K. & I. Sitaridou (2014) Contrastivity and information structure in the Old Ibero-Romance languages. In Bech & Gunn Eide (eds.) Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 377-412. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.14eid https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.14eid

Enç, M. (1991) The semantics of specificity. Linguistic inquiry 22: 1-25.

Giusti, G. (1995) A Unified Structural Representation of (Abstract) Case and Article. In Haider, Olsen & Vikner (eds.) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer, 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_3

Guardiano, C. (2013) The Greek definite article across time. Studies in Greek Linguis-tics 33: 76-91.

Haegeman, L. & V. Hill (2013) The Syntacticization of Discourse. In Folli, Sevdali & Truswell (eds.) Syntax and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018

Harris, M.B. (1980) The marking of definiteness in Romance. In Fisiak (ed.) Historical Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110823127.141 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110823127.141

Hinzen, Wolfram (2012) Phases and semantics. In Gallego (ed.) Phases: Developing the framework. Berlin: de Gruyter, 309-342. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104.309 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104.309

Hinzen, W. (2014) The rationality of Case. Language Sciences 46(B): 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.003

Hinzen, W. (2018) On the rationality of grammar. In Gallego & Martin (eds.) Language, Syntax and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316591529.009 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316591529.009

Hinzen, W. & M. Sheehan (2015) The Philosophy of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holmberg, A. (1993) On the representation of case. GLOW-Newsletter 30: 36-37.

Jayaseelan, K.A. & M. Hariprasad (2001) Deixis in pronouns and nouns phrases. Lin-guistic Analysis 31: 132-147.

Jones, M.A. (1993) Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.

Kaplan, D. (1977/1989a) Demonstratives. In Almog, Perry & Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481-563.

Kayne, R. (1975) French Syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kayne, R. (1993) Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47: 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00837.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00837.x

Kayne, R. (2008) Expletives, datives, and the tension between morphology and syntax. In T. Biberauer (ed.) The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Ben-jamins, 175-217. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.07kay https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.07kay

Kiparsky, P. (1998) Partitive case and aspect. In Butt & Geuder (eds.) The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford: CSLI, 265-307.

Kitagawa, Y. (1986) Subject in Japanese and English. PhD Diss.: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Lavidas, N. (2017) Case in diachrony: Or, Why Greek is not English. In Mathieu & Truswell (eds.) Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press, 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198747840.003.0009 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198747840.003.0009

Ledgeway, A. (2012) From Latin to Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.003.0009 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.003.0009

Leiss, E. (2000) Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825961 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825961

Lidz, J. (2006) The Grammar of Accusative Case in Kannada. Language 82: 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0054 https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0054

Longa, V.M., G. Lorenzo & G. Rigau (1998) Subject clitics and clitic recycling: loca-tive sentences in some Iberian Romance languages. Journal of linguistics 34: 125-164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006853 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006853

Longobardi, G. (1994) Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609-665.

Longobardi, G. (2005) Toward a unified grammar of reference. Zeitschrift für Spra-chwissenschaft 24: 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2005.24.1.5 https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2005.24.1.5

Longobardi, G. (2008) Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Klinge & Müller (eds.) Essays on Nominal Determination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.11lon https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.11lon

Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789

Mahajan, A. (1997) Universal grammar and the typology of ergative languages. In Alexiadou & Hall (eds.) Studies in Universal Grammar and Typological Var-iation Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 35-57, https://doi.org/10.1075/la.13.03mah https://doi.org/10.1075/la.13.03mah

Maiden, M. & A. Ledgeway (2016) The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.001.0001

Martin, T. (2012) Deconstructing Catalan Object Clitics. PhD Diss: New York Uni-versity.

Martin, T. & W. Hinzen (2014) The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua 148: 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.016

Martin, T., K. Schroeder & W. Hinzen (2019) The cognitive function of determiners. To appear in Armoskaite & Wiltschko (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Determiners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Michelioudakis, D. & I. Sitaridou (2012) Syntactic Microvariation: Dative Constructions in Greek. In Fernández & Etxepare (eds.) Variation in Datives. A Microcomparative Perspective. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937363.003.0008 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937363.003.0008

Milsark, G. (1974) Existential Sentences in English. PhD Diss: Massachusetts Institute of Technology [Published 1979 by Garland Press].

Moser, A. (2008) The changing relationship of tense and aspect in Greek. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung / Typology and Universals (STUF) 61: 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0003 https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0003

Ormazabal, J. & J. Romero (2013) Object clitics, agreement and dialectal varia-tion. Probus 25.2: 301-344. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0012 https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0012

Paul, H. (1959) Deutsche Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.

Pérez-Saldanya, M. (1997) Del llatí al català. Morfosintaxi verbal histórica. Valencia. Publicacions Universitat de València.

Perlmutter, D. M. (1971) Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Pesetsky, D. & E. Torrego (2001) T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 355-426.

Philippi, J. (1997) The rise of the article in the Germanic languages. In van Kamenade & Vincent (eds.) Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Picallo, C. 2008 On gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio 1: 44-66.

Postal, P. (1966) On so-called 'pronouns' in English. In Reibel & Schane (eds.) Modern Studies in English. New York, NY: Prentice Hall, 201-224.

Rizzi, Luigi 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7

Roca, F. (1992) On the licensing of pronominal clitics: The properties of object clitics in Spanish and Catalan. MA thesis: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Roca, F. (1996) Morfemas objetivos y determinantes: los clíticos del español. Verba 23: 83-119.

Sheehan, M. & W. Hinzen (2011) Moving toward the edge. Linguistic Analysis 37: 405-458.

Sigurðsson, H.A. (2004) The syntax of person, tense and speech features. Rivista di Linguistica 16: 219-251.

Sigurðsson, H.A. (2017) Who are we – and who is I? About Person and SELF. In Bai-ley & Sheehan (ed.) Order and Structure in Syntax II: Subjecthood and Ar-gument Structure. Berlin: Language Science Press, 199–221.

Sitaridou, I. (2011) Word order and information structure in Old Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics. Special issue on Word Order and Information Structure, ed. by M. Battlori & M.-L. Hernanz, 159-184. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.36 https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.36

Suñer, M. (1988) The role of agreement in clitic‐doubled constructions. Natural Lan-guage and Linguistic Theory 6: 391‐434. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133904 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133904

Szabolcsi, A. (1983) The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3: 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89 https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89

Szabolcsi, A. (1994) The noun phrase. In Kiefer & Kiss (eds.) The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian. New York: Academic Press, 179-275. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373174_004 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373174_004

Torrego, E. (1998) The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001

van Driem, G. (1986) A Grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846812 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846812

van Gelderen, E. (2011) The Linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.003.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001

Vincent, N. (1997) The emergence of the D-system in Romance. In van Kamenade & Vincent (eds.) Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Harris, M. & N. Vincent (1988) The Romance Languages. London: Routledge.

Wahlström, M. (2015) The Loss of Case Inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Hel-sinki: Slavica Helsingiesa 47. University of Helsinki.

Zweig, E. (2009) Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 353-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9064-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9064-3