Sobre la sintaxis de las oraciones de relativo
Un análisis de adjunción con estructura compartida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/1.11.3.6661Keywords:
relative clauses, raising analysis, matching analysis, tree adjoining grammar, structure sharingAbstract
In this paper we examine existing analyses for relative clauses (mainly restrictive ones), and propose an analysis for Spanish relatives from the perspective of a lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar (TAG). We will provide a summary of the main proposals in the literature and examine the questions that any analysis of relative clauses should address. Our TAG approach synthesises the descriptive and theoretical advantages of existing models (the head external analysis, the raising analysis, and the matching analysis) and offers a solution to some of the main problems that have been observed in the literature. We will focus on the internal configuration of relative clauses, their structural position, and the category of the expression que in Spanish.
References
Aletá Alcubierre, E. (1990) Estudios sobre las oraciones de relativo. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.
Altshuler, D. & R. Truswell (2022) Coordination and the syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: OUP.
Álvarez, A. (1999) Las construcciones consecutivas, en Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.) Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española Vol. 3, pp. 3379-3804.
Bach, E. (1976) An Extension of Classical Transformational Grammar, en Problems of Linguistic Metatheory. Michigan State University, pp. 183-224.
Baggio, P. (2022) In Defence of DP - The Isomorphism between Nominals and Clauses. Ms. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006754
Barwise, J. & R. Cooper (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219.
Bhatt, R. (1999) Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. Tesis doctoral, University of Pennsylvania.
Bhatt, R. (2002) The raising analysis of relative clauses: evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10, pp. 43–90.
Bianchi, V. (1999) Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Bianchi, V. (2000) The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1), pp. 123-140.
Bianchi, V. (2002a) Headed relative clauses in generative syntax – Part I. Glot International 6(7), pp. 197-204.
Bianchi, V. (2002b) Headed relative clauses in generative syntax – Part II. Glot International 6(8), pp. 1-13.
Borsley, R. (1997) Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry 28, pp. 629–647.
Borsley, R. (2001) More on the raising analysis of relative clauses. Ms. University of Essex. En línea: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.533.8911&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Borsley, R. (2003) Against ConjP. Lingua 115, 461-482.
Bosque, I. & J. Gutiérrez Rexach (2009) Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
Bosque, I. & C. Picallo (1996) Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics 32, pp. 349-385.
Bresnan, J. (1976) Evidence for a theory of unbounded transformations. Linguistic Analysis 2, pp. 353–393.
Brucart, J. M. (1992) Some asymmetries in the functioning of relative pronouns in Spanish. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 1992, pp. 113-143.
Brucart, J. M. (1999) La estructura del sintagma nominal: las oraciones de relativo, en Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.) Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española Vol. 1. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 395-522.
Brucart, J. M. (2011) Sobre una discordancia de número…relativa, en Ma. V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & C. Sánchez López (eds.) 60 problemas de gramática dedicados a Ignacio Bosque. Madrid: Akal, pp. 306-314.
Brucart, J. M. (2016) Oraciones de relativo, en Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica. Londres: Routledge, pp. 722-736.
Brucart, J. M. & M. Ll. Hernanz (2015) Las posiciones sintácticas, en Á. Gallego (ed.) Perspectivas de Sintaxis Formal. Madrid: Akal, pp. 33-109.
Brucart, J. M. & J. MacDonald (2012) Empty categories and ellipsis, en J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (eds.) Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 579–602.
Bruening, B. (2020) The head of the nominal is N, not D: N-to-D Movement, Hybrid Agreement, and conventionalized expressions. Glossa 5(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1031
Cable, S. (2008) Q-Particles and the Nature of Wh-Fronting, en L. Matthewson (ed.) Quantification: Universals and Variation. North Holland Linguistics Series. Emerald, pp. 105-178.
Candalija Reina, J. A. (2015) Argumental comitative and reciprocity in Spanish, en E. Barrajón López, J. L. Cifuentes Honrubia & S. Rodríguez Rosique (eds.) Verb Classes and Aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 110-130.
Chomsky, N. (1955) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Manuscrito mimeografiado, MIT. En línea: http://alpha-leonis.lids.mit.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/chomsky_LSLT55.pdf
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1977) On wh-movement, en P. Culicover, A. Akmajian & T. Wasow (eds) Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-132.
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000) Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, en R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.) Step by Step – Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89-155.
Chomsky, N. (2008) On Phases, en R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 133-166.
Chomsky, N. (2021) Minimalism: where we are now, and where we can hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu 160, pp. 1-41.
Cinque, G. (1982) On the Theory of Relative Clauses and Markedness. The Linguistic Review 1, pp. 247–296.
Cinque, G. (2015) Three Phenomena Discriminating between “Raising” and “Matching” Relative Clauses. Semantics-Syntax interface 2(1), pp. 1-27.
Cinque, G. (2020) The syntax of relative clauses. A unified analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
Citko, B. (2001) Deletion under Identity in Relative Clauses. Proceedings of NELS 31, pp. 131–145.
Citko, B. (2005) On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4), pp. 475-496.
Citko, B. & M. Gračanin-Yuksek (2021) Merge. Binarity in (multidominant) syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dekkers, J. (1999) Derivations & Evaluations. On the syntax of subjects and complementizers. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.
Depiante, M. (2018) Null Complement Anaphora, en J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmerman (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP. Doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.28
Di Tullio, A. (1997) Manual de gramática del español. Buenos Aires: Edicial.
Demirdache, H. (1991) Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Tesis doctoral, MIT.
Dowty, D., R. Wall, & S. Peters (1981) Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Dryer, M. S. (2005) Order of relative clause and noun, en M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eguren, L. (2017) Possessives and relative clauses in Spanish. Probus 29(1), pp. 41-72.
Emonds, J. E. (1979) Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2), pp. 211-243.
Escandell-Vidal, Ma. V. (2004) Fundamentos de semántica composicional. Barcelona: Ariel.
Escandell-Vidal, Ma. V. & M. Leonetti (2000) Categorías conceptuales y semántica procedimental, en J. M. Oliver Frade et al. (coords.) Cien años de investigación semántica: de Michél Bréal a la actualidad. Madrid: Ediciones clásicas, pp. 363-378.
Escandell-Vidal, Ma. V. & M. Leonetti (2011) On the rigidity of procedural meaning, en Ma. V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & A. Ahern (eds.) Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Londres: Brill, pp. 81-102.
Fabb, N. (1989) The Difference between English Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Relative Clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26(1), pp. 55-77.
Fábregas, A. (2013) Differential object marking in Spanish: The state of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2), pp. 1–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2603
Fernández Leborans, Ma J. (2003) Los sintagmas del español I: el sintagma nominal. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Fillmore, C. (1963) The Position of Embedding Transformations in a Grammar. Word 19(2), pp. 208-231.
Frank, R. (2002) Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Frank, R. (2006) Phase theory and Tree Adjoining Grammar. Lingua 116(2), pp. 145–202.
Frank, R. (2013) Tree adjoining grammar, en M. den Dikken (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 226-261.
Galán Rodríguez, C. (1999) La subordinación causal y final, en I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.) Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española Vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 3597-3642.
Gallego, Á. (2016) Elipsis, en Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica. Londres: Routledge. 544-556.
García Fernández, L. & Á. Carrasco Gutiérrez (2008) Perífrasis verbales con función de marcador del discurso. Contrarréplica a Olbertz (2007). Verba 35, pp. 439-447.
García Fernández, L. & D. G. Krivochen (2019) Dependencias no locales y cadenas de verbos auxiliares. Verba, 43, pp. 207-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/verba.46.4567
Gärtner, H-M. (2002) Generalized transformations and beyond. Reflections on Minimalist syntax. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Gorn, S. (1967) Handling the growth by definition of mechanical languages. Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, spring joint computer conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 213–224.
Grohmann, K. (2002) Anti-locality and clause types. Theoretical linguistics 28(1), pp. 43-72.
Grosu, A. (2002) Strange relatives at the interface of two millennia. Glot International 6(6), pp. 145-167.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (1998) Semántica lógica y cuantificación nominal: introducción a la teoría de cuantificadores generalizados. University Press of the South.
Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser (1997) On the complex nature of simple predicators, en A. Alsina, J. Bresnan & P. Sells (eds.) Complex predicates. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 29-65.
Hankamer, J. & I. Sag (1976) Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3), pp. 391–428.
Heim, I. & A. Kratzer (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hornstein, N., J. Nunes & K. Grohmann (2005) Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: CUP.
Hulsey, S. & U. Sauerland (2006) Sorting out relative clauses. Natural Language Semantics 14, pp. 111-137.
Hunter, T. & R. Frank (2020) Comparing methods of tree-construction across mildly context-sensitive formalisms. Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 4. Article 36, pp. 355-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/2yek-w380
Jackendoff, R. (1977) X′ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2011) Alternative minimalist visions of language, en R. D. Borsley & K. Börjars (eds.) Non-transformational Syntax. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 268-296.
Jacobson, P. (2012) Direct compositionality, en W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (eds.) The Oxford handbook of Compositionality. Oxford: OUP, pp. 109-128.
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. (2021) Relativas y Anteposición Negativa en inglés y español. Verba 48. En línea. https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.48.6943
Johnson, K. (2016) Toward a Multidominant Theory of Movement. Lectures presented at ACTL, University College, June 2016. https://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/Content/Multi_Movement.pdf
Johnson, K. (2020) Rethinking linearization, en A. Bárány, T. Biberauer, J. Douglas & S. Vikner (eds.) Syntactic architecture and its consequences II: Between syntax and morphology. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Joshi, A. K. (1969) Properties of formal grammars with mixed types of rules and their linguistic relevance, en Proceedings International Symposium on Computational Linguistics, Silnga Sfiby, Sweden. En línea: https://aclanthology.org/C69-4701.pdf
Joshi, A. K. (1985) Tree adjoining grammars, en D. Dowty, L. Karttunen & A. Zwicky (eds.) Natural Language Parsing. Cambridge, Mass.: CUP, pp. 206-250.
Joshi, A. K., L. S. Levy & M. Takahashi (1975) Tree adjunct grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 10, pp. 136-163.
Kallmeyer, L. (2004) Tree-Local Multicomponent Tree-Adjoining Grammars with Shared Nodes. Computational Linguistics 31(2), pp. 187-225.
Kayne, R. (1976) French relative ‘que’, en Marta Luján & Frederick Hensney (eds) Current Studies in Romance Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 255–299.
Kayne, R. (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Keenan, E. & B. Comrie (1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, pp. 63–99.
Kremers, J. (2009) Recursive linearization. The Linguistic Review 26(1), pp. 135-166.
Krivochen, D. G. (2017) Biografía crítica de la Gramática Generativa. Ms. En línea: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321319109_Biografia_Critica_de_la_Gramatica_Generativa_historia_de_los_modelos_sintacticos_transformacionales_-_Corregido_y_aumentado_Junio_2022
Krivochen, D. G. (2022a) Syntax on the Edge: a graph-theoretic analysis of English and Spanish sentence structure. Ms. En revisión.
Krivochen, D. G. (2022b) Constituents, arrays, and trees: two (more) models of grammatical description. Ms. En revisión. https://www.academia.edu/49010722/Constituents_arrays_and_trees_two_more_models_of_grammatical_description_revised_July_2022_
Krivochen, D. G. (2022c) Different and proud of it: a TAG perspective on the coordination of unlike categories. Ms. En revisión. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006490
Krivochen, D. G. & A. Padovan (2021) Lexicalised locality: local domains and non-local dependencies in a lexicalised tree adjoining grammar. Philosophies 2021, 6(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6030070
Krivochen, D. G. & S. F. Schmerling (2022) A Categorial Grammar of Spanish auxiliary chains. Isogloss 8(1), pp. 1-49. https://revistes.uab.cat/isogloss/article/view/v8-n1-krivochen-schmerling
Kroch, A. & A. K. Joshi (1985) The linguistic relevance of a Tree Adjoining Grammar. En línea: http://babel.ling.upenn.edu/papers/faculty/tony_kroch/papers/relevance3.pdf
Kroch, A. & A. K. Joshi (1987) Analyzing Extraposition in Tree Adjoining Grammar, en G. Huck & A. Ojeda (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency. New York: Academic Press, pp. 107-151.
Kural, M. (2005) Tree Traversal and Word Order. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3), pp. 367-387.
Lasersohn, P. (1995) Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lebeaux, D. (1991) Relative Clauses, Licensing and the Nature of Derivations, en S. Rothstein & M. Speas (eds.) Phrase Structure, Heads and Licensing. Nueva York: Academic Press, pp. 209-239. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373198_011
Lees, R. (1960) The grammar of English nominalizations. La Haya: Mouton.
Lees, R. & E. Klima (1963) Rules for English Pronominalization. Language 39(1), pp. 17-28.
Leonetti, M. (1996) El artículo definido y la construcción del contexto. Signo y Seña 5, pp. 103-138.
Levine, R. D. (1985) Right node (non-)raising. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3), pp. 492-497.
Longobardi, G. (1996) The syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory. OTS Working Papers. Research Institute for Language and Speech, Universidad de Utrecht.
López, L. (2012) Indefinite objects. Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
López García, Á. (1983) El problema de la constitución del giro a + complemento directo: de la categoría ‘caso’ a la categoría semántica ‘preposición’. En Estudios de lingüística española. Barcelona, Anagrama, pp. 131-174.
May, R. (1985) Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
McCawley, J. D. (1982) Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1), pp. 91-106.
McCawley, J. D. (1998) The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Montague, R. (1973) The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English, en J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik & P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 221–242.
Morin, Y-C. & M. O’Malley (1969) Multi-rooted vines in semantic representation, en R. Binnick et al. (eds.) Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago, pp. 178-185.
Munn, A. (1994) A minimalist account of reconstruction asymmetries. Proceedings of NELS 24, pp. 397–410.
Ojea, A. (1992) Los sintagmas relativos en inglés y en español. Oviedo, Universidad de Oviedo.
Ojea, A. (2011) A uniform account of headless relatives in Spanish. Language Sciences 40, pp. 200–211.
Pérez Ocón, P. (2015) El arrastre de constituyentes, en J. M. Brucart & Á. Gallego (eds.) El movimiento de constituyentes. Madrid: Visor, pp. 175-190.
Peters, S. & R. W. Ritchie (1973) On the generative power of transformational grammars. Information Sciences 6, pp. 49-83.
Postal, P. M. (2010) Edge-based clausal syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Radford, A. (2009) Analysing English Sentences: a Minimalist approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Radford, A. (2019) Relative Clauses: Structure and Variation in Everyday English. Cambridge: CUP.
Reinhart, T. (1998) Wh-in situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6(1), pp. 29–56.
Rivero, M. L. (1991) Las construcciones de relativo. Madrid: Taurus.
Rizzi, L. (1997) The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery, en L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.
Roca, F. (2015) Determinación y estructura del sintagma nominal, en Á. Gallego (ed.) Perspectivas de Sintaxis Formal. Madrid: Akal, pp. 177-222.
Rodríguez Mondoñedo, M. (2007) The syntax of objects: agree and Differential Object Marking. Tesis doctoral, University of Connecticut.
Rodríguez Remalle, Ma T. (2005) Manual de sintaxis del español. Madrid: Castalia.
Rosenbaum, P. (1965) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Tesis doctoral, MIT.
Ross, J. R. (1969) A proposed rule of Tree-Pruning, en D. Reibel & S. Schane (eds.) Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 288-299.
Ross, H. (2012) A preliminary -but fattened- list of transformations. Ms. En línea: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/haj/Preliminarybufattenedlistoftransformations.pdf
Saddy, D., K. Sloan & D. G. Krivochen (2019) Whoever that likes relatives…, en K. Ramshøj Christensen, H. Jørgensen & J. L. Wood (eds.) The Sign of the V – Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner. Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University, pp. 523–544. doi:10.7146/aul.348.114.
Safir, K. (1986) Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding and Levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4), pp. 663-689.
Safir, K. (1999) Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in A-bar Chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4), pp. 587–620.
Salzmann, M. (2017) Reconstruction and resumption in indirect A′-dependencies. On the syntax of prolepsis and relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Salzmann, M. (2019) A new version of the Matching Analysis of relative clauses, en M. Krifka & M. Schenner (eds.) Reconstruction effects in relative clauses. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 187-224.
Sarkar, A. & A. K. Joshi (1997) Handling coordination in a tree adjoining grammar. Reporte técnico, University of Pennsylvania. En línea: https://www2.cs.sfu.ca/~anoop/papers/pdf/tag-coordination.pdf
Sauerland, U. (2003) Unpronounced heads in relative clauses, en K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (eds.) The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 205-226.
Schabes, Y., A. Abeille & A. K. Joshi (1988) Parsing strategies with 'lexicalized' grammars: Application to tree adjoining grammars, en Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'88). Budapest, Hungría.
Schachter, P. (1973) Focus and Relativization. Language 49(1), pp. 19–46.
Schmerling, S. F. (1975) Asymmetric Conjunction and rules of Conversation, en P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 211-231.
Schmerling, S. F. (2018) Sound and Grammar: a Neo-Sapirian theory of Language. Londres: Brill.
Schuler, W., D. Chiang & M. Dras (2003) Multi-Component TAG and notions of formal power. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 448–455.
Scott, G-J. (2002) Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases, en G. Cinque (ed.) Functional structure in DP and IP. Oxford: OUP, pp. 91-120.
Shieber, S. (1986) An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Brookline, Mass.: Microtome Publishing.
Smits, R. (1989) Eurogrammar. The relative and cleft constructions of the Germanic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Sportiche, D. (2017) Relative clauses: promotion only, in steps. Ms. UCLA. En línea: https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003444
Stockwell, R., P. Schatcher & B. Hall Partee (1973) The Major Syntactic Structures of English. New York, Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
Suñer, M. (2001) The puzzle of restrictive relative clauses with conjoined antecedents, en J. Herschelsohn, E. Mallén & K. Zagona (eds.) Features and Interfaces in Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 267-278.
Vergnaud, J-R. (1973) French Relative Clauses. Tesis doctoral, MIT.
Vijay-Shanker, K. & A. K. Joshi (1991) Unification-based tree adjoining grammars. Reporte técnico, University of Pennsylvania. En línea: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1799&context=cis_reports
de Vries, M. (2002) The syntax of relativization. Utrecht: LOT.
de Vries, M. (2018) Relative Clauses in Syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics <http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/> DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.56
Weir, D. J. (1988) Characterizing mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms. Tesis doctoral, University of Pennsylvania.
XTAG group (2001) A lexicalized TAG for English. Reporte técnico, University of Pennsylvania. En línea: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=ircs_reports
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Diego Gabriel Krivochen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
