Los mejores diagnósticos sobre estados reunidos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/1.11.3.6774Keywords:
Lexical aspect, states, eventsAbstract
The study of states has traditionally suffered from a problem: until recently we lacked tests adequate enough to identify states, since most of these tests were tests that states failed, so this aspectual class could only be defined negatively. With the purpose of offering a useful tool to interested researchers, this article compiles more than twenty diagnoses on states. Along with the more classic (negative) diagnoses (developed in the traditions of Vendler-Dowty and Davidson), a good number of more recent diagnoses are included that already allow to positively characterize states.
References
Arche, María J. 2012. On the aspectuality of the Individual-Level / Stage-Level dichotomy. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(2). 109–132. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.2.2385
Bennett, Michael & Barbara Partee. 1972. Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. Ms. Bloomington: IULC.
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 2015. Perfect States. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 4(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.4.1.3354
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 2017. ¿Estados progresivos? Moenia 23: 367-417.
Chabot, David. 2007. Individual-level predicates and When-conditionals. Master Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Coll-Florit, Marta, Irene Castellón Masalles, Salvador Climent. 2008. Sobre la natura dels estats: una revisió basada en corpus. Sintagma: revista de lingüística 20: 21-36.
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Essays on actions and events, Vol. 5, 105–148. Retrieved from http://ontology4.us/download/dot/Publication/sub_Davi1967a.pdf https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246270.003.0006
De Miguel Aparicio, Elena. 1999. El aspecto léxico. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Escasa Calpe, 2977–3060. Madrid: Bosque, Ignacio; Demonte, Violeta.
Dowty, David. 1979. Grammatical relations and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7
Ernst, Thomas. 2016. Modification of stative predicates. Language 92(2). 237–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0042
Fábregas, Antonio. 2022. Lexical aspect in Spanish: contrasts, syntactic structures and semantic interpretations. Borealis. An international Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 11: 1-191. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.11.3.6692
Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael. 2012. Differentiating eventivity from dynamicity: the Aktionsart of Davidsonian state verbs. LSRL 42. Cedar City, UT: Southern Utah University.
Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael. 2017. On non-dynamic eventive verbs in Spanish. Linguistics 55(3). 451–488. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0001
Fernández de Castro, Félix. 1999. Las perífrasis verbales en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.
Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827413
García Fernández, Luis. 2009. Semántica y sintaxis de la perífrasis ‘estar + gerundio’. Moenia: Revista lucense de lingüistica & literatura (15). 245–274.
García-Pardo, Alfredo. 2020. Stative Inquiries. la.264,. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Retrieved from https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.264
Gennari, Silvia Patricia. 2002. Spanish Past and Future Tenses: Less (Semantics) is More. In From Words to Discourse, Vol. 10, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585475295_004
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16(4). 547–593.
Iatridou, Sabine & Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumyana. 2003. Observations about the form and meaning of the Perfect. In Perfect Explorations, 153–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.153
Jaque, Matías. 2016. Relaciones entre aspecto y modalidad epistémica: algunas consecuencias de las restricciones temporales sobre la evaluación de predicados. Onomázein (33). 130–155. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.33.06
Katz, Graham. 2000. Anti neo-Davidsonianism: Against a Davidsonian semantics for state sentences. In Events as grammatical objects, 393–416.
Katz, Graham. 2003. On the stativity of the English perfect. In Perfect explorations, eds. A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert and A. von Stechow, 205-234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Katz, Graham. 2008. Manner Modification of State Verbs. Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse. Ed. McNally, Louise and Chris Kennedy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 220-248.
Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. Psychology Press.
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch & J. F. A. K. van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression, 75–115. Dordrect: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877335-005
Lakoff, George. 1970. Irregularity in Syntax. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and Plurality Vol. 76. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4359-2
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2003. Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen,. Akademie Verlag.
https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050082271
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31(3). 275–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Existence: Semantics and syntax, 107–130. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_4
Marín, Rafael. 2001. El componente aspectual de la predicación. Tesis doctoral. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Marín, Rafael. 2018. Los estados y el argumento davidsoniano. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 7(2). 267–279. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.2.4584
Michaelis, Laura A. 2011. Stative by construction 49(6). 1359–1399. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.038
Mittwoch, Anita. 2005. Do states have Davidsonian arguments? Some empirical considerations. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, 69–88. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110913798.69
Pancheva, Roumyana. 2003. The aspectual makeup of Perfect participles and the interpretations of the Perfect. In Perfect Explorations, 277–306. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.277
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rothmayr, Antonia. 2009. The structure of stative verbs Vol. 143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.143
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759127
Smith, C.S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7
Soto, Guillermo. 2008. Sobre el llamado futuro de probabilidad. Algunas condiciones del valor modal de –ré. Boletín de Filología 43(1). 193–206.
Taylor, Barry. 1977. Tense and Continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(2). 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351103
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371
Vlach, Frank. 1981. La sémantique du temps et de l’aspect en anglais. Langages 15(64). 65–79. https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1981.1885
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Marín
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
