Make your mouth agua: idioms and the integrated hypothesis

Luis López; Irati  De Nicolás; Rodi Laanen; Charlotte Pouw; José Sequeros-Valle; M. Carmen Parafita Couto

doi:10.7557/1.12.1.6984

Authors

Luis López University of Illinois Chicago
Irati De Nicolás University of Chicago
Rodi Laanen Leiden University
Charlotte Pouw University of Amsterdam
José Sequeros-Valle University of Nebraska - Omaha
M. Carmen Parafita Couto Leiden University / Universidade de Vigo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/1.12.1.6984

Keywords:

lexicon, code-switching, integrated hypothesis, distributed morphology

Abstract

Recent work argues that a bilingual linguistic system is fully integrated in one competence system and does not consist of two separate, autonomous systems as is commonly assumed (see Goldrick et al 2016, Grimstad et al 2014, López 2020, Riksam 2017). Here, we explore the organization of the lexicon within the integration hypothesis using data based on idioms and code-switching. The working hypothesis is that if the lexicons of a bilingual person are integrated in the sort of grammatical architecture presented in López (2020), one should be able to code-switch within the idiom and retain the idiomatic meaning. After a pilot study with a community of Papiamentu-Dutch bilinguals, we tested this hypothesis with two communities of bilingual code-switchers: Basque-Spanish, English-Spanish. The task consisted of choosing a meaning out of three choices for a range of sentences, some of which included code-switched idioms. Our results, by-and-large, confirm the hypothesis that code-switching does not destroy the integrity of the idiom.

References

Alexiadou, A., and T. Lohndal. 2018. Units of language mixing: A cross-linguistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology Volume 19, Article 1719

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01719

Alexiadou, A., T. Lohndal, T. Åfarli and M. B. Grimstad. 2015. Language mixing: A Distributed Morphology approach. In Thuy Bui and Denis Ozildiz (eds) Proceedings of NELS. Amherst, Mass: GLSA Publications, pp 25-38.

Audring, J. 2022. Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 8: 39-58.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-115118

Bruening, B. 2020. Idioms, Collocations and Structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38: 365-424.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09451-0

Espinal, M. T. and J. Mateu. 2019. Idioms and Phraseology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Linguistics. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.51

https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.51

Davies, M. 2006. A Frequency Dictionary of Spanish. New York, NY & London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203415009

Edele, A., Seuring, J., Kristen, C. and Stanat, P. 2015. Why bother with testing? The validity of immigrants' self-assessed language proficiency. Social Science Research, 52, 99-123.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.017

Fernández, E. and H. Smith Cairns (eds.). 2017. The Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516

Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001

Goldrick, M., M. Putnam and L. Schwartz. 2016. Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19: 857-876.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000802

González-Vilbazo, K. and L. López. 2012. Little v and parametric variation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30:1, 33-77.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9141-5

González-Vilbazo, K., L. Bartlett, S. Downey-Giménez, S. Ebert, J. Heil, B. Hoot and S. Ramos. 2013. Methodological considerations in code-switching research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6: 119-138

https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2013-1143

Grimstad, M. B., T. Lohndal and T. Åfarli. 2014. Language mixing and exoskeletal theory: A case study of word-internal mixing in American Norwegian. Nordlyd 41: 213-237, special issue on Features edited by M. Krämer, S. Ronai and P. Svenonius. University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway. http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd

https://doi.org/10.7557/12.3413

Halle, M. and A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the Pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp 111-176.

Harley, H. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40:3/4, 225-276.

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0010

Harley, H. and R. Noyer. 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of Vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations. In Bert Peeters (ed) The Lexicon-Encyclopedia Interface. Elsevier Press, pp 349-374.

https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585474465_014

Hoffman, T. and G. Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001

Hsin, L. and G. Legendre. 2019. Strong Integration in Bilingual Grammar, Formalized. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(3): 427-467.

https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17040.hsi

Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373167_003

Keller, M. 2020. Compositionality: Evidence from Code-Switching. In E. Piirainen, N. Filatkina, S. Stumpf and C. Pfeiffer (eds) Formulaic Language and New Data. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp 197-224.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669824-009

Kroll, J., P. Dussias, C. Bogulski and J. Valdés Kroff. 2012. Juggling Two Languages in One Mind: What Bilinguals Tell Us About Language Processing and its Consequences for Cognition. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 56: 229-262

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00007-8

Kroll, J. F., P. Dussias, K. Bice, and L. Perrotti. 2015. Bilingualism, Mind, and Brain. Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 377-394.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937

Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: Massa-chussetts Institute of Technology Press.

Levelt, W.J.M. & A. Meyer .2000. Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 12: 433-452.

https://doi.org/10.1080/095414400750050178

Li, M., and X. Zhang. 2021. A meta-analysis of self-assessment and language performance in language testing and assessment. Language Testing, 38: 189-218.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220932481

López, L. 2018. Questions on data and input to GEN. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 19: 889-890.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000079

López, L. 2020. Bilingual Grammar. Toward an Integrated Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108756181

MacSwan, J. 2000. The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: evidence from intrasentential code switching. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 3:1, 37-54.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728900000122

Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitradis et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Upenn Working Papers in Linguistics, pp 221-225.

McGinnis, M.J. 2002. On the Systematic Aspect of Idioms. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 665-672.

https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2002.33.4.665

Meisel, J. 2019. Bilingual Children. A Guide for Parents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316850329

Myers-Scotton, C. 1993. Duelling Languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Nunberg, G., I. Sag and T. Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70: 491-532.

https://doi.org/10.2307/416483

Papafragou, A, J.C. Trueswell and L.R. Gleitman (eds.) 2022. The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.001.0001

Pouw, C., I. De Nicolás, R. Laanen, L. López, M.C. Parafita Couto, J. Sequeros,. In progress. The role of INFL in code-switching.

Riksem, B., M.B. Grimstad, T. Lohndal and T. Åfarli. 2019. Language mixing within verbs and nouns in American Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Syntax: 189-209.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-019-09109-6

Senaldi, M., Wei, J., Gullifer, J. W., & Titone, D. 2022. Scratching your tête over language-switched idioms: Evidence from eye-movement measures of reading. Memory & cognition, 50(6), 1230-1256.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01334-x

Spenser, A. 1991. Morphological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Titone, D., G. Columbus, V. Whitford, J. Mercier and M. Libben. 2015. Contrasting Bilingual and Monolingual Idiom Processing. In R.R. Heredia and A.B. Cie'slicka (eds) Bilingual Figurative Language Processing Cambridge University Press, pp 171-2-7.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342100.011

Titone, D., K. Lovseth, K. Kasparian, M. Tiv, R. Jamieson. 2019. Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 73: 216-230.

https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000175

van Osch, B. 2019. Vulnerability in heritage speakers of Spanish in The Netherlands: An interplay between language-internal and language/external factors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Volterra, V. and T. Taeschner. 1978. The acquisition and development of language by bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 5: 311-326.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007492

Zeng, T., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. 2020. Do bilinguals represent between-language relationships beyond the word level in their lexicon? Journal of Neurolinguistics 55: 100892.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100892