Spanish Verbs of Becoming and Cluster Concepts

Authors

  • Carlos Benavides University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/1.12.2.7207

Keywords:

change of state verbs, cluster concepts, exemplar, copular verbs, similarity

Abstract

The behavior of Spanish verbs of becoming (e.g., volverse rico ‘to become rich’), also known as pseudocopular or semicopular verbs, has received relatively little attention in the literature. Bybee & Eddington (2006) (B&E) analyze these verbs employing an exemplar model based on frequency and semantic similarity. The current paper presents an analysis of verbs of becoming based on the notion of cluster concepts (Jackendoff 2002, 1983), set within a scale, as an alternative account to B&E’s, that explains the behavior of this class of verbs in a more precise and comprehensive way. The current study shows that there are strong tendencies in the use of adjectives with a given verb of becoming, which correlate to their use with the copular verbs ser/estar. Crucially, the cluster concept model accounts for uses of adjectives that do not fall into any particular grouping in B&E’s model. A corpus study supports the analysis. The current study represents an original contribution in that it is the only study that treats verbs of becoming using the notion of cluster concepts.

References

Albright, A., & Hayes, B. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/ experimental study. Cognition 90(2).119-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-X

Ambridge, Ben. 2020. Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language 40(5-6).509-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719869731

Boas, Hans. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee and D.

Wanner (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics, 143–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.69.14bos

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886

Bybee, Joan. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 49-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004

Bybee, Joan, and David Eddington. 2006. A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of becoming. Language 82.323-355. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081

Clements, J. Clancy. 2006. Ser-estar in the Predicate Adjective Construction. In J. Clancy Clements & Jiyoung Yoon (eds), Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax, 161-202. Basingstoke UK, Palgrave-Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522688_8

Davies, Mark. 2002. Corpus del Español. www.corpusdelespanol.org.

Delbecque, Nicole and Lise Van Gorp. 2015. The pseudo-copular use of the Spanish verbs hacerse and volverse: two types of change. CogniTextes Vol. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.843.

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.547-619. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021

Eddington, David. 1999. On 'becoming' in Spanish: A corpus analysis of verbs expressing change of state. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18.23-35.

Eddington, David. 2000. Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology. Lingua, 110(4), 281- 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00043-1

Eddington, David. 2002. Disambiguating Spanish change of state verbs. Hispania 85.921-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/4141261

Goldberg, Adele, & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532-568. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129

Huang, Yi Ting, and Steven Pinker. 2010. Lexical semantics and irregular inflection. Language and cognitive processes 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690961003589476

Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001

Jackendoff, Ray. 2019. Conceptual Semantics. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: Theories, 86-113. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589245-004

Jackendoff, Ray, and Jenny Audring. 2020. The texture of the lexicon: Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827900.001.0001

Luján, Marta. 1981. The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua 54.165-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90068-1

Marcos Marin, Francisco. 1992. Corpus oral de referencia del español contemporáneo. Textual corpus, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Masini, Francesca, & Jenny Audring. 2019. Construction Morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 365-89. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.25

McQueen, Cutler, and Norris. 2006. Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon. Cognitive Science 30.1113-1126 . https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_79

Morimoto, Yuko, and Victoria Pavón Lucero. 2004. Aproximación semantica a la gramática de ponerse y quedarse. Studia Romanica Posnanensia 31.385-392. https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2004.31.037

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure 45.137-157. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie

Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and Rules. New York: Basic Books.

Pinker, Steven. 2006. Whatever happened to the past tense debate? Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, ed. by Eric Bakovic, Junko Ito, John J. McCarthy. Createspace Independent Pub.

Pinker, Steven, y Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.456-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3

ten Hacken, Pius. 2014. Delineating derivation and inflection. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, ed. by Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10-25.

Thompson, Sandra. 2002. Object complements and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26. 125-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho

Van Gorp, Lise. 2015. Pseudo-copular use of the Spanish verbs ponerse and quedarse: two types of change. CogniTextes Vol. 13. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes

Downloads

Published

2023-11-24

How to Cite

Benavides, C. (2023). Spanish Verbs of Becoming and Cluster Concepts. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 12(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.12.2.7207