Poor pronoun systems and what they teach us
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/12.3314Keywords:
pronoun, person, number, typology, agreementAbstract
The world’s smallest pronoun systems can eschew any of the following contrasts: (i) author–nonauthor, (ii) participant–nonparticipant, (iii) singular–nonsingular. This supports the view that features are mutually independent parameters (Harbour 2011a, 2014a, 2014b), but is problematic for Koeneman and Zeijlstra’s (2014) recent reworking of the Rich Agreement Hypothesis, which is predicated on the claim that (i)–(iii) are universally obligatory.
Downloads
Published
2015-01-21
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Harbour, D. (2015). Poor pronoun systems and what they teach us. Nordlyd, 41(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.3314