Compounds split by silence: the case of Dutch synthetic adjectival compounds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/12.8198Keywords:
synthetic adjectival compounds, compound pruning, clausal ellipsis, vocabulary non-insertion, DutchAbstract
We describe a novel ellipsis phenomenon attested in Dutch synthetic adjectival compounds, whereby the right part of the compound undergoes ellipsis and the left part gets realised. Such partial realisation of the compound is standardly accompanied by clausal ellipsis of some sort (gapping, sluicing or fragment formation). After inventorising the morphosyntactic properties of the phenomenon, we argue that the ellipsis targeting the right part of the compound is not coordination reduction (Booij 1985), but standard ellipsis. We settle for an account for the facts that is based on the observation that synthetic adjectival compounds in Dutch are not word-level units but syntactic phrases, within which the stranded first part is a syntactic phrase itself. Its phrasehood allows it to undergo A-bar movement out of the compound to form a remnant of clausal ellipsis, while clausal ellipsis needs to be present to allow the affixal second part to be non-realised.
References
Abels, Klaus. 2018a. On sluicing with apparent pied-piping, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37 4: 1205–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9432-1.
Abels, Klaus. 2018b. Movement and islands. In The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, edited by Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Tanja Temmerman, pp. 389–424. Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.17.
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2007. A movement account of Dutch gapping. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of the Netherlands, February 3, Utrecht.
An, Duk-Ho. 2025. Extra deletion in retrospect and prospect. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 34: 361–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-025-09298-0.
Barros, Matthew. 2014. Sluicing and Identity in Ellipsis. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3VM49R5.
Barros, Matthew, Patrick D. Elliott, and Thoms, Gary. 2014. There is no island repair. Ms., Rutgers University, University College London, and University of Edinburgh. Available at https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002100.
de Belder, Marijke. 2022. N-to-D Movement within compounds and phrases: Referential compounding, -s possessives, and title expressions in Dutch. Languages 7: 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040304.
Belk, Zoë. 2019. LF bracketing paradoxes: A new approach. Syntax 22 1: 24–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12166.
Boone, Enrico. 2014. The Syntax and Licensing of Gapping and Fragments. Ph.D. thesis, Leiden University. LOT, Utrecht.
Bresnan, Joan and Sam A. Mchombo. 1995. The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992782.
Bosque, Ignatio. 2019. Lexical integrity in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.584.
Booij, Geert. 1985. Coordination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology. In Advances in Non-Linear Phonology, edited by Harry van der Hulst and Neil Smith, pp. 143–60. Foris, Dordrecht.
Booij, Geert. 2019. The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838852.001.0001.
Broekhuis, Hans and Norbert Corver. 2019. The Syntax of Dutch. Coordination and Ellipsis. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk3gpn5.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, edited by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, pp. 89–155. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Chung, Sandra. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31, edited by Rebecca T. Cover and Yuni Kim, pp. 73–91. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, Ca. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v31i1.896.
Compton, Richard and Christine Pitman. 2010. Word-formation by phase in Inuit. Lingua 120: 2167–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.012.
Corver, Norbert and Marjo van Koppen. 2009. Let’s Focus on NP-Ellipsis. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 48: 3–26.
Corver, Norbert and Marjo van Koppen. 2011. NP-ellipsis with adjectival remnants: A micro-comparative perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 371–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9140-6.
Corver, Norbert and Marjo van Koppen. 2018. Dutch. In Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, edited by Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Tanja Temmermann, pp. 721–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.37.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2010. The Syntax of Ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch Dialects. Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375640.001.0001.
Fitzgibbons, Natalia. 2014. Parasitic ellipsis. In Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Robert Santana-LaBarge, 170–9. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, Ma.
de Haas, Wim and Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands: Een Overzicht van de Woordvorming [Morphological handbook of Dutch: An overview of word formation]. SDU Uitgeverij, The Hague.
Harley, Heidi. 2009. Compounding in DM. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, edited by Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer, pp. 129–44. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0007.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1988. Head-types in morphosyntax. In Yearbook of Morphology 1988, edited by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, pp. 123–38. Foris, Dordrecht.
Kenesei, István. 1995/96. On bracketing paradoxes in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 43 1–2: 153–73.
Kenesei, István. 2008. Az ellipszis szabályai a szóösszetételekben. In A morfológiától a pragmatikáig, edited by Károly Bibok, pp. 63–77. JATE Press, Szeged.
Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996. The Nature of Adjectival Inflection. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University.
Lipták, Anikó and Güliz Güneş. 2022. The derivational timing of ellipsis: An overview of theoretical approaches. In The Derivational Timing of Ellipsis, edited by Güliz Güneş and Anikó Lipták, pp. 1–56. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849490.003.0001.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001.
Merchant, Jason. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Topics in Ellipsis, edited by Kyle Johnson, pp. 132–53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487033.006.
Mendes, Gesoel and Andrew Nevins. 2023. When ellipsis can save defectiveness and when it can’t. Linguistic Inquiry 54 1: 182–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00428.
Neef, Martin. 2015. Synthetic compounds in German. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, edited by Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, and Franz Rainer, vol. 1, pp. 582–93. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-035.
Potter, David, Michael Frazier, and Masaya Yoshida. 2017. A two-source hypothesis for Gapping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35 4: 1123–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9359-y.
Reich, Ingo. 2007. Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. In On Information Structure: Meaning and Form, edited by Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, pp. 467–84. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.13.04wil.
Schneider, Johannes. 2025. Parasitic ellipsis and higher-order structures. In Proceedings of the 41st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Nikolas Webster, Yağmur Kiper, Richard Wang, and Sichen Larry Lyu, pp. 538–47. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, Ma.
Temmerman, Tanja. 2013. The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers: On the PF-theory of islands and the WH/sluicing correlation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31 1: 235–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9180-6.
Van Santen, Ariane and Geert Booij. 1998. Morfologie. De Woordstruktuur van het Nederlands. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
Wilder, Chris. 1997. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies in Universal and Typological Variation, edited by Artemis Alexiadou and Tracy Hall, pp. 59–107. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.13.04wil.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anikó Lipták, Crit Cremers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.