Måleegenskaper ved den norske versjonen av Autism Diagnostic Interview- Revised (ADI-R)

Authors

Marianne Halvorsen Habilitering for barn og unge (HABU), Universitetssykehuset i Nord-Norge, Tromsø https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-7612
Sissel Berge Helverschou NevSom - Nasjonalt kompetansesenter for Nevroutviklingsforstyrrelser og hypersomnier, Oslo Universitetssykehus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-6733

DOI:

Keywords:

Autismespekter, Barn i førskolealder, Barn i skolealder, Ungdo, Voksne

Abstract

Description: ADI-R is a semi-structured interview developed by Sir Michael Rutter, Ann Le Couter and Cathrine Lord to provide valid and reliable diagnostics of Autism Spectrum Disorders. The first version was published in 1989 by Western Psychological Services and a revised version in 1994 (ADI-R). The Norwegian version was developed by Hogrefe in 2009. There is a Norwegian protocol and an American manual available for users. The interview can be used to assess both adults and children above the age of 12 months and with mental age above 10 months. ADI-R consists of 93 items. The interview lasts 1.5–2.5 hours. To administer the ADI-R, an experienced clinical interviewer questions a parent or caretaker who is familiar with the developmental history and current behaviour of the individual being evaluated. Cut-off values are calculated by a diagnostic algorithm to give an indication of suspicion of an autism spectrum disorder. Literature search.
Literature search: A systematic search for psychometric evidence for the Norwegian, Swedish and Danish versions of the ADI-R identified 190 articles. Experts suggested three additional articles. The included publications reported data from one population-based Norwegian study of totally 679 participants, in addition to six clinical studies from Sweden, in which the largest study included 268 participants. The majority of the participants were children and adolescents. Psychometrics.
Psychometrics: The diagnostic validity of the new toddler algorithms of the ADI-R gave lower sensitivities compared to the original American validation studies. The convergence of the ADI-R and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (ADOS) showed mixed results. The inter-rater reliability for single ADI-R algorithm items, behavioral domains totals and agreement for diagnostic classification is good. Characteristics such as child age, IQ and conduct problems, in addition to parental concern for ASD, can influence the construct validity of the ADI-R. Conclusion.
Conclusion: There are no Norwegian or Scandinavian norms available. The diagnostic validity of the new toddler algorithms is acceptable when combined with direct observation through the ADOS. Child and caregiver characteristics may hamper the construct validity of the ADI-R. Further studies should investigate the construct validity of the ordinary diagnostic algorithms in addition to instrument reliability.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Washington D.C.

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA

Cohen, I.L. (2003). Criterion-related validity of the PDD Behavior Inventory. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022278420716

Constantino, J.N., Davis, S.A., Todd, R.D., Schindler, M.K., Gross, M.M., Brophy, S.L. et al. (2003). Validation of a brief qualitative measure of autistic traits: Comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the Autism Diagnosis Interview-Revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025014929212

Ekström, A.-B., Hakenäs-Plate, L., Samuelsson, L., Tulinius, M. & Wentz, E. (2008). Autism spectrum conditions in myotonic dystrophy type 1: A study on 57 individuals with congenital and childhood forms. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B, 147B, 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30698

European Federation of Pscyhologists’ Association (EFPA). (2013). EFPA Review model for the description and evaluation of psychological tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers, v 4.2.6: EFPA.

Gilberg, I.C. & Gillberg, C. (1989). Asperger syndrome –Some epidemiological considerations: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 30, 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00275.x

Havdahl, K.A., Bal, V.A., Huerta, M., Pickles, A., Øyen, A-S., Stoltenberg, C. & Lord, C. (2016). Multidimensional influences on autism symptom measures: Implications for use in etiological research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55, 1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.490

Havdahl, K.A., Bishop, S.L., Surén, P., Øyen, A., Lord, C., Pickles, A. et al. (2017). The influence of parental concern on the utility od autism diagnostic instruments. Autism Research. 10(10):1672-1686. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1817

Johansson, M., Gillberg, C. & Råstam, M. (2010). Autism spectrum conditions in individuals with Möbius sequence, CHARGE syndrome and oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum: Diagnostic aspects. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.011

Kim, S.H. & Lord, C. (2012a). Combining information from multiple sources for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders for toddlers and young preschoolers from 12 to 47 months of age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02458.x

Kim, S.H. & Lord, C. (2012b). New autism diagnostic interview-revised algorithms for toddlers and young preschoolers from 12 to 47 months of age. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1213-1

Kim, S.H., Thurm, A., Shumway, S. & Lord. C. (2013). Multisite study of New Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) Algorithms for toddlers and young preschoolers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1527–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10803-012-1696-4

Kopp, S., Kelly K.B. & Gillberg, C. (2010). Girls with social and/or attention deficits: A descriptive study of 100 clinic attenders. Journal of Attention Disorders, 14, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054709332458

Le Couteur, A., Rutter, M., Lord, C. Rios, P., Robertson, S., Holdgrafer, M., & McLennan, J.D. (1989). Autism Diagnostic Interview: A semistructered interview for parents and caregivers of autistic persons. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02212936

Lord, C. & Jones,R.M. (2012). Annual research review: Re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53 (3): 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02547.x

Lord, C., Rutter, M. & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and developmental Disorders, 24(5): 659–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02172145

Lord, C. et al., (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule- Generic: A standardized measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3): 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005592401947

Lord, C. et al., (2012). A multisite study of the clinical diagnosis of different autism spectrum disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69 (3): 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.148

Matson, J.M., Nebel-Schwalm, M. & Matson,M.L.(2007). A review of methodological issues in the differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders in children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.07.004

Norris, M., Lecavier, L. & Edwards, M.C. (2012). The structure of autism symptoms as measured by the autism diagnostic observation schedule. Journal of Autism and developmental Disorders, 42(6):1075–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1348-0

Nygren, G., Hagberg, B., Billstedt, E., Skoglund, Å., Gillberg, C. & Johansson, M. (2009). The Swedish version of the diagnostic interview for social and communication disorders (DISCO-10). Psychometric properties. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0678-z

Rutter, M, Lecouteur, A. & Lord, C. (2003). The Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). Los Angeles, CA, Western psychological Services.

Rutter’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (2015). Redaktører: Thapar, A. & Pine, D.A., Leckman, J.F., Scott, S., Snowling, M.J, Taylor, E. Sixth edition, John Wiley and sons, ltd.

Schjøllberg, S. (2015). Autism Diagnostic Interview og Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule i Norge. Autisme i dag, 42, (3): 92–97.

World Health Organisation (1993) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1993

Zander, E., Strum, H. & Bölte, S. (2015). The added value of the combined use of the autism diagnostic interview-revised and the autism diagnostic observation schedule: Diagnostic validity in a clinical swedish sample of toddlers and young preschoolers. Autism, 19, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313516199

Zander, E., Willfors, C., Berggren, S., Coco, C., Holm, A., Jifält, I. et al. (2017). The interrater reliability of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) in clinical settings. Psychopathology. 50(3):219-227. https://doi.org/10.1159/000474949.

Downloads

PDF (Norsk)

Additional Files

Søkestrategi (Norsk)

Published

2017-06-27

How to Cite

Halvorsen, M. ., & Helverschou, S. B. (2017). Måleegenskaper ved den norske versjonen av Autism Diagnostic Interview- Revised (ADI-R). PsykTestBarn, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21337/0052