Developments in the Quantitative Assessment of Welfare Outcomes in Hunted Mammals Subject to Shooting




animal welfare outcomes, hunting, wildlife shooting programmes, time to death, instantaneous death rate, post-mortem examination, marine mammals, terrestrial mammals


Knowledge gaps surrounding animal welfare assessment in hunted terrestrial wild mammals and seals were highlighted in the reviews by Knudsen (2005) and EFSA (2007). Following these reviews, the present paper aims to report on developments in the quantitative assessment of welfare outcomes in wild mammals killed via rifle shooting, and modern explosive harpoon grenades used in the killing of whales. Time to death (TTD) and instantaneous death rate (IDR) are widely accepted ante-mortem variables for assessing the duration of suffering during the killing process. The addition of post-mortem assessments allows for validation of TTD and IDR, thus providing a more accurate appraisal of animal welfare during hunting. While this combined assessment for large cetaceans has been implemented since the 1980s in the Norwegian minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) hunt, we report that this approach has been implemented in studies of the Icelandic minke and fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) hunts, as well as the Canadian and Norwegian commercial harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) hunts. Additionally, this approach has been incorporated into welfare studies in terrestrial herbivore management programmes. Quantitative welfare assessment during hunts is capable of effectively evaluating the weapons used and judging modifiable variables such as projectile choice, optimal shooting procedure, as well as identifying areas for improvement in hunter training. In moving towards a standardised approach for welfare outcome assessment, an established framework can effectively allow all hunts to be contrasted and allow for identification of optimal strategies that minimise animal suffering.


Aebischer, N. J., Wheatley, C. J., & Rose, H. R. (2014). Factors associated with shooting accuracy and wounding rate of four managedwild deer species in the UK, based on anonymous field records from deer stalkers. PloS ONE, 9(10), e109698.

Bateson, P., & Bradshaw, E. L. (1997). Physiological effects of hunting red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264(1389), 1707-1714.

Bryan, H. M., Smits, J. E., Koren, L., Paquet, P. C., Wynne‐Edwards, K. E., & Musiani, M. (2015). Heavily hunted wolves have higher stress and reproductive steroids than wolves with lower hunting pressure. Functional Ecology, 29(3), 347-356.

Burke, T., Page, B., Van Dyk, G., Millspaugh, J., & Slotow, R. (2008). Risk and ethical concerns of hunting male elephant: behavioural and physiological assays of the remaining elephants. PLoS ONE, 3(6), e2417.

Butterworth, A., Sadler, L., Knowles, T.G., & Kestin, S.C. (2004). Evaluating possible indicators of insensibility and death in cetacea. Animal Welfare, 13(1), 13–17. Retrieved from:

Cockram, M. S., Shaw, D. J., Milne, E., Bryce, R., McClean, C., & Daniels, M. J. (2011). Comparison of effects of different methods of culling red deer (Cervus elaphus) by shooting on behaviour and post mortem measurements of blood chemistry, muscle glycogen and carcase characteristics. Animal Welfare, 20(2), 211-224. Retrieved from:

Daoust, P.-Y., & Cattet, M. (2004). Consideration of use of the .22 caliber rimfire Winchester magnum cartridge for instant killing of young harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus) pp 37. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc, 2004/072. Retrieved from

Daoust, P.-Y., & Caraguel, C. (2012). The Canadian harp seal hunt: observations on the effectiveness of procedures to avoid poor animal welfare outcomes. Animal Welfare, 21(4), 445-455.

Daoust, P.-Y., Caraguel, C., Fenton, H., Hammill, M.O., Roy, L. D., & Spears, J. (2013). Assessment of current and alternative methods for killing young grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) during commercial harvest. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc, 2012/132. Retrieved from

European Commission. (2009) Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Official Journal of the European Union, 303, 1-30. Retrieved from European Commission website:

European Food Safety Authority. (2007). Animal Welfare aspects of the killing and skinning of seals‐Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. EFSA Journal, 5(12), 610, 1-122.

Grandin, T. (2006). Progress and challenges in animal handling and slaughter in the US. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100(1-2), 129-139.

Grandin, T. (2010). Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants. Meat Science, 86(1), 56-65.

Hampton, J. O. (2017). Animal welfare for wild herbivore management (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Murdoch University website:

Hampton, J. O., Cowled, B. D., Perry, A. L., Miller, C. J., Jones, B., & Hart, Q. (2014). Quantitative analysis of animal-welfare outcomes in helicopter shooting: a case study with feral dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius). Wildlife Research, 41(2), 127-135.

Hampton, J. O., Forsyth, D. M., Mackenzie, D., & Stuart, I. (2015). A simple quantitative method for assessing animal welfare outcomes in terrestrial wildlife shooting: the European rabbit as a case study. Animal Welfare, 24(3), 307-17.

Hampton, J. O., Adams, P. J., Forsyth, D. M., Cowled, B. D., Stuart, I. G., Hyndman, T. H., & Collins, T. (2016). Improving animal welfare in wildlife shooting: the importance of projectile energy. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 40(4), 678-686.

Hampton, J. O., & Forsyth, D. M. (2016). An assessment of animal welfare for the culling of peri-urban kangaroos. Wildlife Research, 43(3), 261-266.

Hampton, J.O., Edwards, G.P., Cowled, B.D., Forsyth, D.M., Hyndman, T.H., Perry, A.L., …Collins, T. (2017). Assessment of animal welfare for helicopter shooting of feral horses. Wildlife Research, 44 (2), 97-105.

Hampton, J. O., DeNicola, A. J., & Forsyth, D. M. (2020). An assessment of lead-free .22 LR bullets for shooting European rabbits. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 44, 760-765.

Hampton, J. O., Arnemo, J. M., Barnsley, R., Cattet, M., Daoust, P.-Y., DeNicola, A. J., … Wimpenny, C. (2021). Animal welfare testing for shooting and darting free-ranging wildlife: a review and recommendations. Wildlife Research, 48(7) 577-589.

Hampton, J. O., Bengsen, A. J., Pople, T., Brennan, M., Leeson, M., & Forsyth, D. M. (2021). Animal welfare outcomes of helicopter-based shooting of deer in Australia. Wildlife Research. Online Early.

Hampton, J. O., Eccles, G., Hunt, R., Bengsen, A. J., Perry, A. L., Parker, S., … Hart, Q. (2021). A comparison of fragmenting lead-based and lead-free bullets for aerial shooting of wild pigs. PLoS ONE, 16(3): e0247785.

International Whaling Commission. (1980). Report of the Workshop on Human Killing Techniques for Whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission IWC/30/15. Retrieved from IWC website:

Ishikawa, H. (2010). Progress Report on the Killing Method of Whales in the Second Phase of Japanese Whale Research Program in the Antarctic Sea (JARPAII) and Northwestern Pacific Ocean (JARPNII). Report to the NAMMCO Expert Group meeting on assessment of whale killing data, Copenhagen, Denmark, 17 – 18 February 2010. Retrieved from NAMMCO website:

Ishikawa, H., & Shigemune, H. (2005). Improvements in more humane killing methods of Antarctic minke whales, Balaenoptera bonaerensis, in the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic Sea (JARPA). Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 10(1), 27-34.

Kanstrup, N., Balsby, T. J., & Thomas, V. G. (2016). Efficacy of non-lead rifle ammunition for hunting in Denmark. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 62, 333–340.

Kestin, S. C. (1995). Welfare aspects of the commercial slaughter of whales. Animal Welfare, 4(1), 11-27. Retrieved from:

Kneubuehl, B.P. (Ed.), Coupland, R.M., Rothschild, M.A., & Thali, M.J. (2011). Wound Ballistics. Basics and Applications. (3rd Ed.) Berlin: Springer.

Knudsen, S. K. (2005). A review of the criteria used to assess insensibility and death in hunted whales compared to other species. The Veterinary Journal, 169(1), 42-59.

Knudsen, S. K., & Øen, E. O. (2003). Blast-induced neurotrauma in whales. Neuroscience research, 46(3), 377-386.

Lewis, A. R., Pinchin, A. M., & Kestin, S. C. (1997). Welfare implications of the night shooting of wild impala (Aepyceros melampus). Animal Welfare, 6(2), 123-131. Retrieved from:

Maiden, N. (2009). Ballistics reviews: mechanisms of bullet wound trauma. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 5(3), 204-209.

Massaro, P.P. (2017). Factors affecting the bullet in flight. In Massaro, P.P. (Ed.), Big Book of Ballistics (pp. 100-111). Iola, Wisconsin: Gun Digest Books.

Mellor, D. J., & Littin, K. E. (2004). Using science to support ethical decisions promoting humane livestock slaughter and vertebrate pest control. Animal welfare, 13(1), 127-132. Retrieved from:

Newgard, K. (1992). The physiological effects of handgun bullets: the mechanisms of wounding and incapacitation. Wound Ballistics Rev. 1(3), 12–7.

Newhook, J.C., & Blackmore, D.K. (1982). Electroencephalographic studies of stunning and slaughter of sheep and calves: part 1 - the onset of permanent insensibility in sheep during slaughter. Meat Science, 6, 221-233.

North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission. (2010). Report of the NAMMCO expert group meeting on assessment of whale killing data. Retrieved from NAMMCO website:

North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission. (2015). Report of the expert group meeting on assessing time to death data from the large whale hunts. Retrieved from NAMMCO website:

Nuvoli, S., Burrai, G. P., Secci, F., Columbano, N., Careddu, G. M., Mandas, L., … Antuofermo, E. (2014). Capture myopathy in a corsican red deer Cervus elaphus corsicanus (Ungulata: Cervidae), Italian Journal of Zoology, 81(3), 457-462.

Ryeng, K. A., & Larsen, S. E. (2021). The relative effectiveness of two expanding bullet designs in young harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus): A randomised controlled field study in the Norwegian harp seal hunt. Animal Welfare, 30(2), 155-167.

Shaw, F. D., & Tume, R. K. (1992). The assessment of pre-slaughter and slaughter treatments of livestock by measurement of plasma constituents—a review of recent work. Meat science, 32(3), 311-329.

Stokke, S., Arnemo, J. M., Brainerd, S., Söderberg, A., Kraabøl, M., & Ytrehus, B. (2018). Defining animal welfare standards in hunting: body mass determines thresholds for incapacitation time and flight distance. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1-13.

Stokke, S., Arnemo, J. M., & Brainerd, S. (2019). Unleaded hunting: Are copper bullets and lead-based bullets equally effective for killing big game? Ambio, 48, 1044–1055.

Terlouw, C., Bourguet, C., & Deiss, V. (2016). Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing. Meat Science, 118, 133-146.

Urquhart, K. A., & McKendrick, I. J. (2006). Prevalence of ‘head shooting’ and the characteristics of the wounds in culled wild Scottish red deer. Veterinary record, 159(3), 75-79.

Verhoeven, M. T. W., Gerritzen, M. A., Hellebrekers, L. J., & Kemp, B. (2015). Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review. Animal, 9(2), 320-330.

Øen, E. O. (2021). Animal Welfare in the Conduct of Whaling: A Review of the Research and Developments to Improve Animal Welfare in the Minke Whale Hunt in Norway 1981–2005. Senri Ethnological Studies, 104, 287-318.




How to Cite

Smith, S. D. G., & Ryeng, K. A. (2022). Developments in the Quantitative Assessment of Welfare Outcomes in Hunted Mammals Subject to Shooting. NAMMCO Scientific Publications, 12.