SE in Spanish
Properties, structures and analyses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/1.10.2.5934Keywords:
SE reflexive SE; impersonal SE; passive SE; aspectual SE; inherent SE; anticausative SE; reciprocal; middle SE; spurious SE; agentive SE; transitive SE; antipassive SE; factitive SEAbstract
This article provides an overview of Spanish SE, covering the main empirical facts, analyses and theoretical issues that it raises, and exploring the prospects to unify all uses –which are over a dozen in the literature– under one same object that keeps its surface properties invariable. We will show that it is almost inescapable to propose that SE is associated to two types of objects, defective arguments and defective verbal heads; both objects share the property of not introducing referentially independent DPs, which can be argued to be the result of the grammaticalisation of a reflexive element in contemporary Spanish. The chapter proposes that a treatment of SE as a projection introduced high in the clausal structure and acting as an agreement locus can be a fruitful way to unify all uses of SE.
References
Ackema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry 26 (2): 173-197.
Alcaraz, A. 2017. Spurious vs. dative. Ms., available at lingbuzz/003293. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.02alc
Alcaraz, A. 2021. Agreement, binding and the structure of Spanish clitics. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country.
Alexiadou, A. & E. Anagnostopoulou. 2004. Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & M. Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0005 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0005
Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou & F. Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations. A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou, & F. Schäfer. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation. Berlín: Mouton, 187-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.4.187 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.4.187
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Anderson, S. R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001
Aoun, J. 1981. The formal nature of anaphoric relations. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Armstrong, G. & J. MacDonald. 2021. A guide to understanding SE constructions: where they come from and how they are connected. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_1
Armstrong, G. & P. Kempchinsky. 2021. Causative SE: a transitive analysis. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_9
Armstrong, G. 2013. Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive se constructions in Spanish. Borealis 2 (2): 81–128. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2526 https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2526
Balari, S. & N. Bel. 1990. Se impersonal: por qué no es un clítico de sujeto. In M. A. Álvarez Martínez (ed.), Actas del congreso de la Sociedad Española de Lingülstica. XX aniversario, Madrid, Gredos, vol. 1, pp. 318-328.
Barbosa, P. 2000. Clitics: a Window into the Null Subject Property. In J. Costa (ed.), Portuguese Syntax: Comparative Studies, pp. 31-93. New York: Oxford Press.
Basilico, D. 2010. The se clitic and its relation to paths. Probus 22, pp. 271-302. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2010.010 https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2010.010
Beavers, J. & A. Koontz-Garboden. 2013. In defense of the reflexivization analysis of anticausativization. Lingua 131, pp. 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.009
Béjar, S. & M. Rezac. 2003. Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic Science series 4, pp. 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.244.07bej https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.244.07bej
Belletti, A. & L. Rizzi. 1988. Psych verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, pp. 291–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133902 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133902
Belletti, A. 1982. Morphological passive and pro-drop: The impersonal construction in Italian. Journal of Linguistic Research 2 (4), pp. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1982.2.2.101 https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1982.2.2.101
Bello, A. 1847. Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (2002).
Benveniste, É. 1960. Problems in general linguistics. Ed. Florida: University of Miami Press.
Bleam, T. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic doubling. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware
Bogard, S. 1996-1997. El sentido anticausativo y su formalización sintáctica en el español. RPL 3, pp. 271-289.
Bogard, S. 1999. Duplicación y clausura argumental: dos funciones del clítico reflexivo en español. Español actual 71, pp. 41-48.
Bonet, E. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. PhD diss., MIT.
Bonet, E. 1995. Feature structure of romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, pp. 607–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992853 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992853
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808506 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808506
Bosque, I. 1992. Anáforas distributivas: la gramática de sendos. Miscellanea Antverpiensia. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 59-92.
Bosque, I. 1999. Repaso de sintaxis tradicional. Ejercicios de autocomprobación. Madrid: Arco / Libros.
Brucart, J. M. 2012. Copular alternations in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 7, pp. 9.43.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. 1999. The 'se' constructions in Spanish and near-native competence. Spanish Applied Linguistics 3, pp. 247-96.
Bull, William E. 1952. The intransitive reflexive: ‘ir’ vs. ‘irse’. The Modern Language Journal 36(8), pp. 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1952.tb06587.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1952.tb06587.x
Büring, D. (2005). Binding theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802669 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802669
Campos, H. 1989. Impersonal passive SE in Spanish. Linguisticae Investigationes 13, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.13.1.02cam https://doi.org/10.1075/li.13.1.02cam
Cano Aguilar, R. 1981. Estructuras sintácticas transitivas en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.
Cardinaletti, A. 2000. On different types of clitic clusters. Workshop on the Antisymmetry Theory, Cortona, May 15-17.
Cardinalletti, A. & M. Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. Clitics in the languages of Europe, 8. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145
Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Cartagena, N. 1972. Sentido y estructura de las construcciones pronominales en español. Concepción: Publicaciones del Instituto Central de Lenguas.
Cennamo, M. 1999. Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 97 (1), pp. 103–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00046 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00046
Cennamo, M., T. Eythórsson & J. Bardal. 2015. Semantic and (morpho)-syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53 (4): 677–730. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0015 https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0015
Charnavel, I. 2019. Locality and logophoricity: A theory of exempt anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190902100.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190902100.001.0001
Chierchia, G. [1989] 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Everaert, M. (eds.), The unaccussativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 22-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002
Chung, S. & W. Ladusaw. 2003. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5927.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5927.001.0001
Cinque, G. 1988. On si construction and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (4), pp. 521-581.
Clements, J. C. 2006. Transitivity and Spanish non-anaphoric se. In J. Clancy Clements & Jiyoung Yoon (eds.), Functional approaches to Spanish syntax, 236–264. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522688_11 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522688_11
Condoravdi, C. 1988. The middle: where semantics and morphology meet. Student conference in linguistics. MIT working papers in linguistics 11, pp. 16-30.
Contreras, H. 1973. Grammaticality versus acceptability. The Spanish se case. Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 83-88.
Contreras, H. 1974. Indeterminate subject sentence in Spanish. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Contreras, L. 1966. Significados y funciones de 'se'. Zeitschrift for Romanische Philologie 82, pp. 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1966.82.3-4.298 https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1966.82.3-4.298
Creissels, D. 2006. Syntaxe générale. Une introduction typologique. Paris: Hermès.
Cuervo, M. C. 2003. Datives at large. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Cuervo, M. C. 2013. Spanish clitic clusters: Three of a perfect pair. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2 (2), pp. 191–220. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2692 https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2692
Cuervo, M. C. 2014. Alternating unaccusatives and the distribution of roots. Lingua 141, pp. 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.001
Cuervo, R. J. 1874. Notas a la Gramdtica de la lengua castellana de don Andrés Bello. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.
D'Alessandro, R. 2007. Impersonal Si constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207514 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207514
Darlymple, M., M. Kanazawa, S. Mchombo & S. Peters. 1994. What do reciprocals mean? SALT IV, pp. 61-78. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v4i0.2466 https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v4i0.2466
De Benito Moreno, C. 2015. Las construcciones con 'se' desde una perspectiva variacionista y dialectal. PhD Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
De Benito Moreno, C. 2021. Is there really an aspectual SE in Spanish? Folia Linguistica 55, pp. 195-230. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2074 https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2074
De Cuyper, G. 2006. La estructura lexica de la resultatividad y su expresión en las lenguas germánicas y románicas. München: Lincom.
De Kock, J. & E. Gómez Molina. 1990, Las formas pronominales del verbo y la pasiva. In De Kock (ed.), Gramática española, vol. 11. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
De Mello, G. 1978. On the use of por + agent with se constructions. Hispania 61, pp. 323-327. https://doi.org/10.2307/340879 https://doi.org/10.2307/340879
De Mello, G. 1996. Morir frente a morirse en el español hablado contemporáneo. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 112 (2), pp. 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1996.112.2.277 https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1996.112.2.277
De Miguel, E. & M. Fernández Lagunilla. 2000. El operador aspectual se. Revista Española de Lingüística 30 (1), pp. 13-43.
De Miguel, E. 1992. El aspecto en la sintaxis del español Madrid: UAM.
Déchaine, A.M. & M. Wiltschko. 2020. A formal typology of reflexives. Studia Linguistica 71, pp. 60-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12072 https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12072
Deguchi, A. 1978. Antipassive and reflexive passive in Spanish. Lingüística Hispánica (Osaka) 1, pp. 87-101
Deguchi, A. 1982. On reflexive structures. Lingüística Hispánica 5, pp. 33-45.
Devís Márquez, P. 1993. Esquemas sintáctico-semánticos: el problema de la diátesis en español. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2012. La construcción de la lectura agentiva del se no argumental. In Valeriano Bellosta von Colber & Marco García García (eds.), Aspectualidad – Transitividad – Referencialidad. Las lenguas románicas en contraste, 69–85. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Dimitriadis, A. 2004. Discontinuous reciprocals. Ms., University of Utrecht. Available from http://www.let.uu.nl/~Alexis.Dimitriadis/personal/papers/
Dimitriadis, A. 2007. Irreducible symmetry in reciprocal constructions. In König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: crosslinguistic and theoretical explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 1998. Impersonal se construction in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29, pp. 399-437. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553806 https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553806
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 2006. The se anaphor and its role in argument realization. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, vol. 4, 118–179. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch56 https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch56
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 2021. Implicit agents and the person constraint on SE-passives. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_5 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_5
Doron, E. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11, pp. 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023021423453 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023021423453
Dougherty, R. C. 1974. The syntax and semantics of each other constructions. Foundations of Language, 1 2 : 1-47.
Dowty, D. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. The semantics of verbs and time in generative semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7
Embick, D. 2004. Unaccusative Syntax and Verbal Alternations. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, & M. Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: explorations of the syntax–lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0006 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0006
Escobar, L. & Teomiro, I. 2016. The gradual acquisition of clitic ‘se’ in Spanish L2. Topics in Linguistics 17, pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/topling-2016-0002 https://doi.org/10.1515/topling-2016-0002
Everaert, M. 1999. Types of anaphoric expressions: reflexives and reciprocals. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Curl, Traci S. (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.04eve https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.04eve
Fábregas, A. & M. Putnam. 2020. Passives and Middles in Mainland Scandinavian. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110670912 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110670912
Fábregas, A. & T. Cabré. 2020. Ways of being a dative across Romance varieties. In A. Pineda & J. Mateu (eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and Beyond. Language Science Press, pp. 395-411.
Fábregas, A. & T. Cabré. 2021. Towards a syntactic account of ungrammatical clitic sequences and their repairs. In M. O. Hinzeling, N. Pomino & E. M. Remberger (eds.), Formal approaches to Romance Morphosyntax. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 91-117. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110719154-004 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110719154-004
Fábregas, A. 2013. Differential object marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2 (2), pp. 1–80. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2603 https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2603
Fábregas, A. 2018. Determiners and quantifiers in Spanish. Borealis 7, pp. 1-108. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.2.4546 https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.2.4546
Fagan, S. M. 1988. The English Middle. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (2), pp. 181-203.
Fagan, S. M. 1992. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: a study with special reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feliu, E. 2003. Morfología derivativa y semántica léxica. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Fellbaum, C. 1986. On the middle construction in English. Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Fernández Ordóñez, I. 1999. Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1317-1398.
Fernández Ramírez, S. [1957] 1986. Gramática española, vol 4. El verbo y la oración. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Fernández Ramírez, S. 1964. Un proceso lingüístico en marcha. Presente y futuro de la lengua española, Madrid, III, pp. 277-285.
Fernández Soriano, O. 1989. Rección y Ligamiento en español: Aspectos del Parámetro del Sujeto Nulo. Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Fiengo, R. & H. Lasnik. 1973. The logical structure of reciprocal sentences in English. Foundations of Language, 9(4):447-468.
Fiengo, R. & R. May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Fillmore, C. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. In R. A: Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum, (eds.), Readings in english transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, pp. 120-133.
Folli, R. 2001. Constructing telicity in English and Italian. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.
Fontana, J. M. 1993. Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Franco, J. 1993. Conditions on clitic doubling: the agreement hypothesis. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo" 27(1), pp. 285-298.
Franco, J. 2000. Agreement as a Continuum. Clitic phenomena in European languages 30, 147. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.30.07fra https://doi.org/10.1075/la.30.07fra
García Fernández, L. & D. Gómez Vázquez. 2015. More than a Copula: Complex Predicates with estar and the Clitic se. In New Perspectives on the Study of Ser & Estar, ed. by Isabel Pérez Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel, pp. 23–50. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.02gar https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.02gar
García Fernández, L. 2011. Algunas observaciones sobre se aspectual”. In J. Cuartero Otal, L. García Fernández & C. Sinner (eds.), Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto. München: Peniope, pp. 43-71.
García Fernández, Luis. 2015. Some reflections on verbs with clitic increase: Verbs of motion. In Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia & Susana Rodríguez Rosique (eds.), Verb classes and aspects, 264–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.12gar https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.12gar
García Negroni, M. M. 2002. La construcción media con 'se'. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con 'se'. Madrid: Visor, pp. 276-311.
García Pardo, A. 2021. Light verbs and the syntactic configurations of SE. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_10 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_10
García Tejada, A., A. Cuza & E. G. Lustres Alonso. 2021. The production and comprehension of Spanish se use in L2 and Heritage Spanish. Second Language Research. Online first, pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211016537 https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211016537
Gehrke, B. 2012. Passive states. In V. Demente & L. McNally (eds), Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0008 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0008
Gianollo, C. 2014. Labile verbs in Late Latin. Linguistics 52 (4), pp. 945–1002. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0013 https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0013
Gili Gaya, S. 1943. Curso superior de sintaxis española. Madrid: Bibliograph.
Gómez Soler, I. 2015. Acquisitional patterns of Spanish anticausative se: The end of the road. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 28, pp. 349–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.2.01gom https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.2.01gom
Gómez Torrego, L. 1992. Valores gramaticales de se, Madrid, Arco Libros.
Gómez Vázquez, D. & L. García Fernández. 2013. Estados controlados. In Actas del X Congreso de Lingüística General, ed. by J. F. Val Álvaro et al., 335–346. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Grimshaw, J. 1982. On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexivie Clitics. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, pp. 87-148.
Grimshaw, J. B. 1997. Projection, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28(3), pp. 373–422.
Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser. 1986. Some transitivity alternations in English. Lexicon Project Working Papers 7. Cambridge (Mass.): Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser. 1987. A view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 10. Cambridge (Mass.): Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
Harley, H. 2017. The bundling hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In R. D'Alessandro et al. (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001
Harris, J. 1995. The Morphology of Spanish Clitics. In H. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory. Washington: Georgetown U. Press.
Harris, J. W. & M. Halle. 2005. Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36, pp. 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710710 https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710710
Harris, J. W. 1983. Syllable structure and stress in Spanish. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Härtl, H. 2003. Conceptual and grammatical characteristics of argument alternations: The case of decausative verbs. Linguistics 41 (5), pp. 883–916. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.029 https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.029
Haspelmaht, M. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
Haspelmath, M. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has
Haspelmath, M. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative / causative alternations. In B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 87-120. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.05has https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.05has
Hatcher, A. G. 1957. Se hace algo vs. algo se hace. Modern Language Notes 73, pp. 102-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/3043048 https://doi.org/10.2307/3043048
Haverkate, H. 1980. La construccion pseudorreflexiva y la estructura antropocéntrica de la oración española. In Diálogos hispánicos en Amsterdam, 1. Los clíticos en el español actual.
Heap, D. 1998. Optimizing Iberian Clitic Sequences. In J. Lema & E. Treviño (eds.), Theoretical Analyses on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.157.13hea https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.157.13hea
Heggie, L. & F. Ordóñez (eds). 2005. Clitic and affix combinations. Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.74 https://doi.org/10.1075/la.74
Heidinger, S. 2014. The persistence of labile verbs in the French causative-anticausative alternation. Linguistics 52, pp. 1003-1024. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0014
Heim, I., H. Lasnik & R. May. 1991. Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22, pp. 63-101.
Hernández Sacristán, C. 1986. En torno a los verbos pronominales y su doble origen. Lingüistica Española Actual VIII, pp. 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/iber.1991.1991.33.16
Hernández Sacristán, C. 1991. Configuración funcional y construcción refleja en español. Iberorromania 33, pp. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1515/iber.1991.1991.33.16
Higginbotham, J. 1980. Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11(4), pp. 679-708.
Hoeckestra, T. & I. Roberts. 1993. Middle constructions. In E. Reuland & W. Abraham (eds.), Knowledge of language II. Lexical and conceptual structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Horvath, J. & T. Siloni. 2011. Causatives across components. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 657-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9135-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9135-3
Horvath, J. & T. Siloni. 2013. Anticausatives have no cause(r): A rejoinder to Beavers & Koontz-Garboden. Lingua 131, pp. 217–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.013
Iglesias Bango, M. 1991. La voz en la gramdtica española. León: Universidad de León.
Jaeggli, O. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112420225 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112420225
Jaeggli, O. 1986. Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction. The syntax of pronominal clitics, pp. 13-42. London: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373150_003 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373150_003
Jespersen, O. 1927. A Modern English Grammar: On Historical Principles (Vol. Part III Syntax. Second Volume). Copenhagen: Heidelberg.
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. & M. Tubino. 2014. Variación sintáctica en la causativización léxica. Revista Española de Lingüística 44 (1): 7–37.
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. & M. Tubino. 2019. Causativity in southern peninsular Spanish. In The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects, ed. Á. Gallego, 181–212. Oxford: OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0007 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0007
Jordan, P. G. 1973. La forma se como sujeto indefinido en español. Hispania 56, pp. 597-603. https://doi.org/10.2307/339248 https://doi.org/10.2307/339248
Kanski, Z. 1992. lmpersonal constructions as a strategy for second-order predication. In M. Kefer & J. van der Auwera (eds.), Meaning and grammar. Cross-linguistic perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 95-122.
Kayne, R. S. 1969. The transformational cycle in French syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Kayne, R. S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Kayne, R. S. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing. The null subject parameter. Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 239-261). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_8
Kayne, R. S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Kayne, R. S. 2000. Chapter 8. Person morphemes and reflexives in Italian, French and related languages. In Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kayne, R. S. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001
Kayne, Richard S. 2010. Toward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005). In Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, Reineke Bok-Bennema & Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2008: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen 2008, 145–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.2.09kay https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.2.09kay
Kempchinsky P. 2000. Aspect projections and predicate types. In H. Campos et al. (eds), Hispanic linguistics at the turn of the millennium. Somerville, MA: Casacadilla Press, pp. 171–83.
Kempchinsky, P. 2004. Romance se as an aspectual element. In J. Auger et al. (eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics”. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.258.13kem https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.258.13kem
Kempchinsky, P. 2006. Teasing apart the middle. In Andolin gogoan/Homenaje a Andolin Eguzkitza, eds. Itziar Laka and Beatriz Fernández, 532–547. University of the Basque Country Press.
Keyser, S. J. & T. Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (3), pp. 381-416.
Klein, P. 1987. The syntax and semantics of Spanish SE. Hispanic Journal 9, pp. 149-162.
Koontz-Garboden, A. 2007. States, changes of state, and the monotonicity hypothesis. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Koontz-Garboden, A. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27, pp. 77–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9
Kovacci, O. 1986. Estudios de gramática española. Buenos Aires: Hachete.
Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 109–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5
Labelle, M. & E. Doron. 2010. Anticausative derivations (and other valency alternations) in French. Probus 22 (2), pp. 303–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2010.011 https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2010.011
Labelle, M. 1992. Change of state and valency. Journal of Linguistics 28, pp. 375–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015267 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015267
Labelle, M. 2008. The French reflexive and reciprocal se. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9053-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9053-1
Lakoff, G. & S. Peters. 1969. Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. In Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, ed. David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 113–142. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lakoff, G. 1971. Irregularities in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Landa, Alazne. 1995. Conditions on null objects in Basque Spanish and their relation to leísmo and clitic doubling. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.
Langendoen, D. T. 1978. The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9, pp. 177-197.
Lekakou, M. 2005. In the Middle, Somewhat Elevated. The semantics of middles and its crosslinguistic realization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London.
Levin, B. & M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Levin, B. 1993. Verb Classes in English. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Llorente, A. 1977. Las construcciones de carácter impersonal en español. Estudios ofrecidos a Emilio Alarcos, 1, Oviedo, pp. 107-125.
López, L. 2007. Locality and the architecture of syntactic dependencies. London: Palgrave-MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597471 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597471
Lozano, A. G. 1970. Non reflexiviry of the indefinite se in Spanish. Hispania 53, pp. 452-457. https://doi.org/10.2307/337966 https://doi.org/10.2307/337966
Lozano, A. G. 1972. The indefinite se revisited. Hispania 55, pp. 94-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/338249 https://doi.org/10.2307/338249
Lundquist, B. 2011. Restrictions on reflexive and anti-causative readings in nominalizations and participles. In T. Strahan, Nordlyd 38, Related to Reflexives. Tromsø: CASTL, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2028 https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2028
MacDonald, J. & J. Melgares. 2021. On (un)grammatical clitic sequences in impersonal SE constructions. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_4 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_4
MacDonald, J. E. 2017. An implicit projected argument in Spanish impersonal and passive se constructions. Syntax 20, pp. 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12146 https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12146
MacDonald, J. E., & M. Maddox. 2018. Passive se in Romanian and Spanish: A linguistic cycle. Journal of Linguistics 54, pp. 389–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671700038X https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671700038X
Maddox, M. L. 2021. The development of SE from Latin to Spanish and the reflexive object cycle. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_2 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_2
Manteca Alonso-Cortés, A. 1976. En torno al se impersonal. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, 6, pp. 167-180.
Manzini, M. R. 1986. On Italian si. In H. Borer (ed.), Syntax and semantics 19. The syntax of pronominal clitics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373150_011 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373150_011
Marantz, A. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 10. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Marcos Marín, F. 1978. Estudios sobre el pronombre. Madrid: Gredos.
Marín, R. & A. Fábregas. 2018. Spanish 'estarse' is not only agentive, but also inchoative. In Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.13mar https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.13mar
Marín, R. 2011. Spanish adjectives within bounds”. In P. Cabredo Hofherr & O. Matushansky (eds.), Formal analyses in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.153.09mar https://doi.org/10.1075/la.153.09mar
Martín Zorraquino, M. A. 1978. Desviaciones del sistema y de la norma de la lengua en las construcciones pronominales españolas. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.
Martín Zorraquino, M. A. 1979. Las construcciones pronominales en español: paradigmas y desviaciones. Madrid: Gredos. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.9.iii52con https://doi.org/10.1075/z.9.iii52con
Martínez Martín, J. 1989. Las expresiones fijas de verbo pronominal en español: verbo + complemento prepositivo. In J. Borrego Nieto et al. Philologica. Homenaje a A. Llorente, Salamanca, págs. 179-193.
Martínez, J. A. 1981. Sobre el se en español. Revista de Filologia de la Universidad de La Laguna, 0, pp. 87-92.
Maslova, Elena. 2007. Reflexive encoding of reciprocity: cross-linguistic and language-internal variation. In König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: cross-linguistic and theoretical explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Masullo, P. 1990. Toward an Incorporation Account o f Argument Alternations in Spanish, M.A. Thesis, University of Washington
Masullo, Pascual José. 1992. Incorporation and case theory in Spanish. A cross-linguistic perspective. PhD diss., University of Washington.
McGinnis, M. 1998. Locality in A-movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Mendikoetxea, A. & A. Battye. 1990. Arb se/si in transitive contexts: A comparative study. Rivista Di Grammatica Generative 15, pp. 161–195.
Mendikoetxea, A. 1992. On the nature of agreement: the syntax of ARB SE in Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of York, GB.
Mendikoetxea, A. 1999. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de lengua española. Volumen 2, Madrid, Espasa Calpe, pp. 1575-1630.
Mendikoetxea, A. 2000. Relaciones de interficie: los verbos de cambio de estado. Cuadernos de Lingüística VII, pp. 125-144.
Mendikoetxea, A. 2002. La semántica de la impersonalidad. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con 'se'. Madrid: Visor, pp. 239-276.
Mendikoetxea, A. 2008. Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. In Impersonal constructions in grammatical theory, A. Siewierska (ed.) Special issue of the transactions of the philological society, 106, 2, pp. 290–336. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00210.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00210.x
Mendikoetxea, A. 2012. Passives and se constructions. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O'Rourke (eds.), The handbook of Spanish linguistics. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 477-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch23 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch23
Michaelis, S. 1998. Antikausativ als Brücke zum Passiv: fieri, venire und se im Vulgärlateinischen und Altitalienischen. In Neuere Beschreibungsmethoden der Syntax romanischer Sprache, ed. Wolfgang Dahmen et al., 69–98. Tübingen: Narr.
Molina Redondo, J.A. 1974. Usos de se. Cuestiones sintácticas y léxicas. Madrid, SGEL.
Monge, F. 1955. Las frases pronominales de sentido impersonal en español. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa VII, pp. 1-102.
Moreno Cabrera, J. C. 1990. Processes and actions: internal agentless impersonals in some european languages. In J. Betrechrt, G. Bernini & C. Buridant (eds.), Toward a typology of european languages. Empirical approaches to language typology 8. Berlín, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863178.255 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863178.255
Morimoto, Y. 2008. 'Me estuve quieto': el concepto de estado y el llamado se aspectual. In Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, ed. by Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde and Ramón González Ruiz, pp. 591–599. Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.
Morimoto, Y. 2011. El control en los predicados estativos. In Estados y estatividad, ed. by Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez, pp. 122–141. Muenchen: LINCOM.
Nedjalkov, V. P. 1969. Nekotorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagol'nom slovoobrazovanii. In I. F. Vardul' (ed.). Jazykovye versalii i lingvisticeskaja tipologija. Moscú: Nauka, pp. 106-114.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.). 2007. Reciprocal constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71 https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71
Nevins, A. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25 (2), pp. 273–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2
Nevins, A. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29(4), 939-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9150-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9150-4
Nevins, A. 2012. Haplological dissimilation at distinct stages of exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence: The state of the art, 84–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0003 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0003
Nishida, C. 1994. The Spanish reflexive se as an aspectual class marker. Linguistics 32 (3), pp. 425-458. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.3.425 https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.3.425
Oca, E. 1914. El pronombre se en nominativo. Boletín de la Real Academia española 1, pp. 573-581.
Oltra-Massuet, I. 2014. Deverbal adjectives at the interface. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510659 https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510659
Omori, Y. 1997. Ambiguity in the constructions with se. Sophia Linguistica 41, pp. 115–131.
Ordóñez, F. & E. Treviño. 2011. Impersonals with passive morphology. In Selected proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics symposium, ed. Luis A. Ortiz-López, pp. 314–324.
Ordóñez, F. 2021. On the nature of impersonal SE: why Italian is not like Catalan and Spanish. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_6
Ordoñez, Francisco 2012. Clitics in Spanish. In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (eds.) The handbook of Hispanic linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch21 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch21
Ordóñez, Francisco, and Esthela Treviño. 2016. Agreement and DOM with impersonal Se: A comparative study of Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. In The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, ed. M. Kato and F. Ordóñez. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465889.003.0010 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465889.003.0010
Ormazabal, J. & J. Romero. 2013. Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25(2), pp. 301-344. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0012 https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0012
Ormazabal, J. & J. Romero. 2019. The formal properties of non-paradigmatic SE. Borealis: International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 8, pp. 55-84. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4704
Ormazabal, J. & J. Romero. 2021. Deconstructing SE constructions: number agreement and post-syntactic variation. Ms., University of the Basque Country and University of Extremadura.
Otero, C. 1966. Gramaticalidad y normativismo. A propósito de algunos escritos de A. Rosemblat. Romance Philology XX, pp. 53-68.
Otero, C. 1986. Arbitrary subjects in finite dauses. In I. Bordelois et al. (eds.), Generative studies in Spanish syntax. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859232-007 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859232-007
Otero, C. 1999. Pronombres reflexivos y recíprocos. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, pp. 1427–1517. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Otero, C. 2002. Facetas de 'se'. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con 'se'. Madrid: Visor, pp. 168-210.
Perlmutter, D. 1971. Surface structure constraints in syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, pp. 187-256.
Pescarini, D. 2010. Elsewhere in romance: Evidence from clitic clusters. Linguistic Inquiry 41, pp. 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00003 https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00003
Pesetsky, D. & E. Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, pp. 262-294. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes
Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Piñón, C. 2001. Modeling the causative-inchoative alternation. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 76, pp. 273-293. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v11i0.2858 https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v11i0.2858
Pollard, C. & I. A. Sag. 1992. Anaphors in English and the Scope of Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23, pp. 261-303.
Postal, P. 1966. On so-called pronouns in English. Monograph series on language and linguistics 19, pp. 177-206.
Preminger, O. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001
Pujalte, M. & A. Saab. 2012. Syncretism as PF-repair: The case of se-insertation in Spanish. In The end of argument structure? ed. M.C. Cuervo & Y. Roberge, 229–260. Bingley: Emerald Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523774_011 https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523774_011
Pujalte, Mercedes. 2013. Argumentos (no) agregados. Indagaciones sobre la morfosintaxis de la introducción de argumentos en español. Ph.D. thesis, University of Buenos Aires.
Pylkkänen, L. 2002. Introducing arguments. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Quine, W. V. O. 1961. Variables explained away. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104(3), pp. 343-347
RAE & ASALE. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
Ramchand, G. 2008. Verb meaning and the Lexicon: a first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319
Ramchand, G. 2018. Situations and syntactic structures. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037754.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037754.001.0001
Raposo, E. & J. Uriagereka. 1996. Indefinite SE. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14 (4), pp. 749–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133363 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133363
Rappaport Hovav, M. & B. Levin. 2010. Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002
Reinhart, T. & E. Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24, pp. 657–720.
Reinhart, T. & T. Siloni. 2005. The lexicon–syntax parameter: reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36, pp. 389–436. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396881 https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396881
Reinhart, T. 1996. Syntactic effects of lexical operations: reflexives and unaccusatives. OTS working papers in linguistics, University ofUtrech.
Reinhart, T. 2000. The theta system: syntactic realization of verbal concepts, OTS Working papers, 00.01/TL, University of Utrecht.
Reuland, E. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0050 https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0050
Ricós, A. 1998. La pasiva con se agentiva en los textos jurídicos administrativos: su incidencia pragmática. Estudios lingülsticos de la Universidad de Alicante 12, pp. 195-209. https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA1998.12.12 https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA1998.12.12
Rigau, G. 1994. Les propietats dels verbs pronominals. Els Marges 50, pp. 29-39.
Rizzi, L. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of 'pro'. Linguistic inquiry 17(3), pp. 501-558.
Roberts, I. 1987. The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877304 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877304
Roberts, I. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001
Roca, F. 1992. Object clitics in Spanish and Catalan. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 2, pp. 245–280.
Rodríguez Díez, B. 1996. Valores de /se/. Estudios filológicos en homenaje a Eugenio de Bustos Tovar, edited by J. A. Bartol Hernández, J. F. García Santos & J. de Santos Guervós. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, pp. 817-830.
Rodríguez Molina, J. 2010. La gramaticalización de los tiempos compuestos en español antiguo. PhD thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Romero Pascual, C. & I. I. Teomiro García. 2012. La relación entre estructura eventiva y papeles temáticos: el se aspectual del español. Revista de Filología Románica 29 (2), pp. 233–243. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RFRM.2012.v29.n2.40156 https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RFRM.2012.v29.n2.40156
Romero, J. & J. Ormazabal. 2019. The formal properties of non paradigmatic ‘se’. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 8: 55–84. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4704 https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4704
Saab, A. 2014. Syntax or nothing: Some theoretical and empirical remarks on implicit arguments. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 3: 125–183. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.3.2.2952 https://doi.org/10.7557/1.3.2.2952
Saltarelli, M. 1994. Voice in Latin and romance: On the representation of lexical subjects. In Issues and theory in romance linguistics, ed. Michael Mazzola, 445–478. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Sánchez López, C. & M. Vivanco. In press. La voz media: estructura argumental. In C. Company Company (dir.), Sintaxis Histórica de la lengua española. [To appear] México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Sánchez López, C. 2002. Las construcciones con se. Estado de la cuestión. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con ‘se’. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Sanz, M. & I. Laka. 2002. Oraciones transitivas con se: el modo de acción en la sintaxis. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con se. Madrid: Visor.
Sanz, M. 1995. Telicity. objects and the mapping onto predicate types. A cross-linguistic analisys of the role of syntax in processing. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Schäfer, F. & M. Vivanco. 2016. Anticausatives are weak scalar expressions, not reflexive expressions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1), 18, pp. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.36 https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.36
Schäfer, F. 2007. On the nature of anticausative morphology: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. PhD dissertation. Opus - Elektronische Hochschulschriften der Universität Stuttgart, Universitätsbibliothek Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126
Schäfer, F. 2008. The syntax of (anti)causatives. External arguments in change of state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126 https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126
Schäfer, F. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (2), pp. 641-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.x
Schäfer, F. 2012. Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers. Studia Linguistica 66 (2), pp. 28–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2012.01192.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2012.01192.x
Schroten, J. 1979. Las oraciones finitas que carecen de sujeto léxico: análisis estructural y análisis generativo. Archivuum XXIX-XXX, pp. 507-534.
Sells, P. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3), pp. 445-479.
Smith, C. S. 1970. Jespersen’s ‘Move and Change’ Class and Causative Verbs in English. In M. A. Jazayery, E. C. Polomé, & W. Winter (eds.), Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill. Vol. 2: Descriptive Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 101–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800432.101 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800432.101
Sportiche, D. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9
Stroik, T. 1992. Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23 (1), pp. 127-137.
Stroik, T. 1995. On middle formation: a reply to Zribi-Hertz. Linguistic Inquiry 26 (1), pp. 165-172.
Strozer, J. 1976. Clitics in Spanish. UCLA Ph.D dissertation.
Suñer, M. 1973. Non paradigmatie ses in Spanish. PhD thesis, Indiana University at Bloomington.
Suñer, M. 1974. Where does impersonal se come from? Proceedings of the third linguistic symposium on Romance languages, Georgetown University Press. R. J. Campbel, M. G. Goldin & M.E. Wang (eds.), pp. 146-157.
Suñer, M. 1983. Pro arb. Linguistic Inquiry 14, pp. 188-191.
Suñer, M. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 391–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133904 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133904
Suñer, M. 1990. Impersonal Se passives and the licensing of empty categories. Probus 2 (2): 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1990.2.2.209 https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1990.2.2.209
Suñer, M. 1992. Subject clitics in the Northern Italian vernaculars and the matching hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, pp. 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133332 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133332
Suñer, M. 2002. Las pasivas con 'se' inpersonal y la legitimación de las categorías vacías. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con 'se'. Madrid: Visor, pp. 210-239.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
Teomiro, I. (2005). Control theory and the timing of PRO. Master theory, Utrecht University.
Teomiro, I. (2010). Anaphors at the Interfaces. A Comparative Study of the Variation of the Anaphoric Systems of English, Dutch and Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
Teomiro, I. (2011). Reflexivity and adjustment strategies at the interfaces. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics 38, pp. 119-149. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2026 https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2026
Torrego, E. 1995. From argumental to non-argumental pronouns: Spanish doubled reflexives. Probus 7(2), pp. 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1995.7.2.221 https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1995.7.2.221
Torrego, E. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001
Tremblay, A. 2006. On the second language acquisition of Spanish reflexive passives and reflexive impersonals by French- and English-speaking adults. Second Language Research 22, pp. 30–63. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr260oa https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr260oa
Trujillo, R. 1988. Sobre las construcciones pasivas. Lingüística Española Actual 10/2.
Uriagereka, J. 1988. On Government. Doctoral dissertation, dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Uriagereka, J. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1), pp. 79-123.
Vivanco, M. 2021. Scalar constraints on anticausative SE: the aspectual hypothesis revisited. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 291-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_12 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_12
Vivanco, Margot. 2016. Causatividad y cambio de estado en español: la alternancia causativo-inacusativa. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Volkova, A. & E. Reuland. 2014. Reflexivity without reflexives? The Linguistic Review 31, pp. 587-644. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0012 https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0012
Walkow, M. 2012. Goals, big and small. Cambridge, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Walkow, M. 2013. Locating variation in person restrictions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19, pp. 247–256.
Wolfsgruber, A. C. 2021. Null subjects and SE revisited: what Medieval Romance varieties reveal. In G. Armstrong & J. E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexities of SE. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 57-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57004-0_3
Wood, J. 2014. Reflexive -st verbs in Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32, pp. 1387–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9243-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9243-y
Wood, J. 2015. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. Dordrecht: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9
Wunderlich, D. 1997. Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28, pp. 27-68.
Zagona, K. 1996. Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual se. In C. Parodi et al. (eds.), Aspects of romance linguistics. Selected from the SLSR XXIV. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 475-488.
Zribi-Hertz, A. 1987. La réfrexivité ergative en français moderne. Le Français Moderne 55 (1), pp. 23-52.
Zribi-Herzt, A. 1993. On Stroik’s analysis of English middle. Linguistic Inquiry 24 (3), pp. 583-589.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Antonio Fábregas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
