Plagiarism check – things to consider

Septentrio Academic Publishing gives editors of Septentrio journals access to the plagiarism detection software CrossCheck iThenticate.

If you are an editor of a Septentrio journal and do not yet have login details, contact septentrio@ub.uit.no.

“Matching text, by itself, is not an indication of plagiarism. To determine if matching text is plagiarism a human needs to evaluate that the text was copied inappropriately and not cited correctly.” – Plagiarism.org 

Each case should be considered separately

Is the overall score high? (≥10%)

• Did you exclude the bibliography, references and quotes?
• Could there be formatting issues making iThenticate include these?
• Are there other sources you can exclude? (e.g. several small matches of frequently used terms or phrases, matches of fewer than e.g. 20 words, or technical language that is difficult to rephrase?)

Individual scores

• Are the individual scores consisting of one or a few larger matches (≥5%) and several smaller ones?
• Are the individual scores all small matches (<5%)?
• Depending on the length of the text, the smaller matches could also be of interest
• Are there huge chunks of text from the same source (several sentences per paragraph), or are the paragraphs made up of matches from different sources?
• Would it be possible to rewrite, or cite matches as direct quotations? 

Which manuscript section are the matches in?

• The methods, and to some degree introduction, sections can contain a higher degree of matches than other sections. Excluding frequently used terms and phrases, there should be no matches in the results and conclusions sections, and none to very few in the discussion section.

Are the matches instances of text recycling (“self-plagiarism”)? Text recycling involves considerations about both research ethics and copyright. Please read "Understanding text recycling: A guide for editors".