“Wrestling mat” or “zone of mutual cooperation”? Contexts, concepts, and representations related to Svalbard in Russian media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/6.8130Keywords:
Svalbard, Spitsbergen, Russian media, Discourse Analysis, Cognitive Linguistics, Corpus Linguistics, Market Basket Analysis, Keyword AnalysisAbstract
The Russian and Norwegian presence on Svalbard, a Norwegian Arctic Archipelago with a unique legal status, is characterized by constrained functional cooperation and diplomatic tension. This study aims to clarify how Svalbard is perceived in Russian public discourse by analyzing a selection of articles from mainstream Russian federal media published between 2010 and 2025. Adopting a linguistic approach – a combination of Critical Discourse Analysis, Cognitive Linguistics and Corpus Linguistics – the study employs Market Basket Analysis to examine the textual data. The findings reveal that the analyzed media construct Svalbard simultaneously as a natural Arctic environment and as a geopolitically and economically significant territory. These representations are produced through a range of stable discourses, including tourism, scientific research, transport infrastructure, and law and regulation, as well as through dynamic, event-driven discourses, such as securitization, legal pressure, legal disputes, and diplomatic tensions. These dynamic discourses frequently represent the archipelago as a contested space and a site of tension, primarily in the context of Russo-Norwegian relations. Within both types of discourses, Russia is presented as a legitimate and authoritative actor on the archipelago.
References
Scholarly sources
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., and McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes. The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103
Bednarek, M. (2005). Construing the World: Conceptual Metaphors and Event-Construal in News Stories. Metaphorik de, 9, 6–32.
Benko, V. (2014). Aranea: Yet Another Family of (Comparable) Web Corpora. In P. Sojka, A. Horák, I. Kopeček, and K. Pala, (eds.). Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8655. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10816-2_31
Benko, V., and Zakharov, V.P. (2016). Very Large Russian Corpora: New Opportunities and New Challenges. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2016” Moscow, June 1–4, 2016.
Cvrček, V., and Fidler, M. (2022). No Keyword is an Island: In Search of Covert Associations. Corpora, 17 (2), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0256
Fidler, M., and Cvrček, V. (2018). Going Beyond “Aboutness”: A Quantitative Analysis of Sputnik Czech Republic. In M. Fidler, and V. Cvrček (eds.). Taming the Corpus. From Inflection and Lexis to Interpretation. 195–225. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98017-1_10
Fidler, M., and Cvrček, V. (2023). Zone-Flooding as a Discursive Strategy of Czech Anti-System News Portals. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 31(1–2), 61–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2023.a936019
Gritsenko, D. (2016). Vodka on Ice? Unveiling Russian Media Perceptions of the Arctic. Energy Research & Social Science, 16, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.012
Hart, C. (2013). Event-Construal in Press Reports of Violence in Political Protests: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(3), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.05har
Integrum World Wide. (n.d.). INTEGRUMTMProfi. Available: http://www.integrumworld.com/rus/int_profi.html
Kelman, I., Sydnes, A.K., Duda, P.I., Nikitina, E., and Webersik, C. (2020). Norway-Russia Disaster Diplomacy for Svalbard. Safety Science, 130, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104896
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709005799
Lipunov, N. (2021). Rossija – Norvegija: lëd tronulsja? Rossijskij sovet po meždunarodnym delam (RSMD). Available: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/arcticpolicy/rossiya-norvegiya-lyed-tronulsya/
Medialogia. (n.d.). Monitoring SMI i socsetej. Instrument ocenki èffektivnosti kommunikacij. Available: https://www.mlg.ru/
Myklebost, K.A, and Bones, S. (2025). Russia on Svalbard: Long-term strategic patterns. The Barents Observer. Available: https://www.thebarentsobserver.com/opinion/russia-on-svalbard-longterm-strategic-patterns/432010
Obukhova, A. (2024a). Replication Data for: Svalbard through the Prism of Russian Media: A Discourse and Cognitive Perspective. https://doi.org/10.18710/UEZZUS. DataverseNO, V1.
Obukhova, A. (2024b). Svalbard through the Prism of Russian Media: A Discourse and Cognitive Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation. UiT The Arctic University of Norway. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/10037/33510
Obukhova, A. (2026). Replication Data for: “Wrestling Mat” or “Zone of Mutual Cooperation”? Contexts, Concepts, and Representations Related to Svalbard in Russian Media. https://doi.org/10.18710/UJFHIA. DataverseNO, V1.
Scott, M. (1998). WordSmith Tools Manual. Version 3.0. Available: https://lexically.net/wordsmith/version3/manual.pdf
Scott, M., and Tribble, C. (2006). Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22
Svalbard Research Office. (2026). Barentsburg. Available: https://www.forskningsradet.no/en/svalbard-research-office/research-communities/barentsburg/
Todorov, A. (2020). “Russia in Maritime Areas off Spitsbergen (Svalbard): Is It Worth Opening the Pandora’s Box?” Marine Policy, 122, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104264
Wither, J.K. (2018). Svalbard: NATO’s Arctic ‘Achilles’ Heel’. The RUSI Journal, 163(5), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2018.1552453
Wæhler, T.A., and Ingebrigtsen, T. (2022). Health Risks, Emergency Preparedness and Norwegian-Russian Cooperation on Svalbard. A Systematic Review. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 81(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2022.2049055
Østhagen, A., Jørgensen, A-K., and Moe, A. (2020). The Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone: How Russia and Norway Manage an Arctic Dispute. Arktika i sever [Arctic and North], 40, 183–205. https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.40.183
Østhagen, A. (2024). The Myths of Svalbard Geopolitics: An Arctic Case Study.” Marine Policy, 167, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106183
Newspaper and media sources
Argumenty Nedeli. (2017). MID Rossii: meroprijatija pod ègidoj NATO v Arktike – èto provokacija. April, 19, 2017.
Gazeta.Ru. (2019a). Agressivnyj “vbros”: v MIDe oprovergli soobščenija o specnaze v Norvegii. October 3, 2019.
Gazeta.Ru. (2019b). Rossijskij specnaz našli v Norvegii. September 30, 2019.
Gazeta.Ru. (2020). Problemy na Špicbergene: Rossija vydvinula pretenzii k Oslo. February 9, 2020.
Gazeta.Ru. (2022). Genkonsul RF Guščin nazval zapret Norvegii na perevozku gruzov na Špicbergen neprodumannym. June 29, 2022.
Gazeta.Ru. (2024). Opredeleny sroki zapuska morskix passažirskix sudov iz Murmanska v Špicbergen. September 4, 2024.
Izvestija. (2022a). V Gosdume osudili otkaz Norvegii v propuske gruzov dlja rossijan na Špicbergene. June 28, 2022.
Izvestija. (2022b). Kosačev nazval amoral’nym otkaz Oslo pustit’ gruzy rossijanam na Špicbergen. June 29, 2022.
Komsomol’skaja Pravda. (2024). Zaxarova: Norvegija možet vovlečʹ Špicbergen v konflikt na Ukraine. December 18, 2024.
Lenta.ru. (2015). V MID Rossii nazvali absurdnoj reakciju Oslo na priezd Rogozina na Špicbergen. April 20, 2015.
Moskovskij Komsomolec. (2011). Zabrošennaja Arktika. S russkogo Špicbergena ubegajut poslednie žiteli. December 12, 2011.
Moskovskij Komsomolec. (2021). Špicbergen lišilsja svoego talismana: istorija kota-pesca Keši. February 17, 2021.
Rossijskaja Gazeta. (2017). V Barencburge dlja èkipaža propavšego Mi-8 razvernuli gospital’. October 26, 2017.
Rossijskaja gazeta. (2022). MID RF: Norvegija naraščivaet voennoe prisutstvie na Špicbergene. October 6, 2022.
Rossijskaja gazeta. (2025). Norvežcy opasajutsja za Špicbergen iz-za èkspansionistskix planov Trampa. January 14, 2025.
RT na russkom. (2011). Rossija obvinila Norvegiju v obostrenii ryboloveckogo konflikta. October 3, 2011.
Vzgljad.ru. (2011). Gosduma ratificirovala dogovor s Norvegiej po Barencevu morju. March 25, 2011.
Vzgljad.ru. (2020). Politika: Norvegija primenila protiv Rossii nagluju taktiku. February 9, 2020.
Vzgljad.ru. (2022). Kak Moskva zastavila Oslo snjat’ blokadu s rossijan na Špicbergene. July 06, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Obukhova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
