Sex-biased dispersal in a northern ungulate population

Authors

  • Hallvard Haanes Centre for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491Trondheim
  • Knut H. Røed Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Dep of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, PO-8146 Dep, N-0033 Oslo
  • Olav Rosef Telemark University College, Dep of Environmental and Health Studies, N-3800 Bø in Telemark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/2.31.1.2038

Keywords:

Bayesian assignment, Cervus elaphus, Norwegian deer, range expansion, sex-biased dispersal

Abstract

In most mammals dispersal is male-biased and in many polygynous ungulates female philopatry and matrilineal grouping involve small-scale genetic structure. We have through sex-related differences in microsatellite allele distribution addressed sex-biased dispersal in a spatially expanding northern ungulate population. The Norwegian red deer population (Cervus elaphus atlanticus) has the last hundred years grown substantially and expanded spatially after a major decline from 300 to 100 years ago. Previous Bayesian analyses suggest a present division of genetic variation into five geographically separated subpopulations. Among these subpopulations the overall Fst values were 0.067 (SE=0.014) for males and 0.094 (SE=0.017) for females. Pairwise Fst values were significantly higher for females than males, demonstrating a stronger genetic structure among females, and that dispersal has been lower in females than males. Accordingly, a higher number of male than female first generation dispersers were identified among the five subpopulations using Bayesian assignment with prior population information, but significantly so only with relaxed stringency levels of assignment. The identified male-biased dispersal distances varied from 30 to 300 kilometers suggesting male biased dispersal on a large scale in red deer.

Downloads

Published

2011-04-01

How to Cite

Haanes, H., Røed, K. H., & Rosef, O. (2011). Sex-biased dispersal in a northern ungulate population. Rangifer, 31(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.7557/2.31.1.2038

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2