Systematic review and classification of: The VIP Partnership Program

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/25.6908

Keywords:

Universal Preventive Program, Learning Environment, Secondary School, High School, School Program

Abstract

Background: The VIP Partnership Program is a health promoting and universal preventive program, developed to facilitate a better transition from lower to upper secondary school (and from primary to lower secondary school) and to promote a good learning environment. The VIP Partnership Program is developed and owned by Vestre Viken Hospital Trust/VIP Mental health in school and financed by the Norwegian Directorate of Health as part of the subsidy scheme “Mental Health in School”.

Methods: This review is based on a systematic literature search in the databases Embase, Medline, Psyinfo, NORART, Cochrane, Cristin, NORA, SCOPUS and SweMed. International databases on evidence have also been searched, as well as information about the intervention from the program provider. Results from literature searches and the other information obtained were reviewed to identify Nordic effect studies, international systematic reviews and eventually other Norwegian studies of the intervention.

Results: The results include an assessment of the programs description, present efficacy study, research methodological quality and implementation quality. The VIP Partnership Program is considered well described and has a broad professional-based framework, while no specified theoretical foundation. The intervention offers some implementation support by offering information meetings and three-hours training. Two Norwegian efficacy studies have been conducted, both with a quasi-experimental design. The first study indicates a significant improvement for schools using the VIP Partnership Program on one outcome variable - social classroom environment, as compared to control schools not implementing the program. The effect was small, and as the VIP Partnership Program was introduced in some of the schools prior to baseline and the nesting in data was ignored in the analyses, the findings are dubious. The second study showed positive outcomes at post-test for happiness and joint depression/anxiety symptoms among students with no or low anxiety at baseline, but not among student with high anxiety. No significant effects were found at six-months follow-up. There were no significant improvements on loneliness.

More studies with a stronger design and analytical approach, and several relevant outcome variables tested are needed to draw any conclusions on program effects in lower and upper secondary schools. In addition, the theoretical rationale for the program should be pointed and justified, and the implementation strategy further developed.

Conclusion: The VIP Partnership Program is classified at evidence level 3 – measures with some documen-tation of effect.

References

Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Childrens loneliness: a comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593680

Bakken, A. (2021). Ungdata 2021. Nasjonale resultater. Hentet fra https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2767874

Bru, E., Idsøe, E. C., & Øverland, K. (2016). Psykisk helse i skolen. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Cohen, J., & Steinberg, R. J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Foa, E., & Weisler, R. H. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia INventory (SPIN). New self-rating scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.4.379

Connor, K. M., Kobak, K. A., Churchill, L. E., Katzelnick, D., & Davidson, J. R. (2001). Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 14(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.1055

Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830190102.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Fandrem, H., Tvedt, M. S., Virtanen, T. E., & Bru, L. E. (2021). Intentions to quit upper secondary education among first generation immigrants and native Norwegians: the role of loneliness and peer victimization. Social Psychology of Education. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09614-1

Frostad, P., Pijl, S. J., & Mjaavatn, P. E. (2015). Losing all interest in school: Social participation as a predictor of the intention to leave upper secondary school early. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.904420

Garcia-Lopez, L., & Moore, H. T. A. (2015). Validation anddiagnostic efficiency of the mini-SPIN in Spanish--speaking adolescents. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/1371/journal.pone.0135862

Gjerustad, C., Smedsrud, J., & Federici, R. A. (2019). Systematisk arbeid med psykisk helse: Spredning, bruk og implementering av eksterne skoleprogram. NIFU. Hentet fra https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/tilskudd/psykisk-helse-i-skolen/NIFUrapport2019-25.pdf/_/attachment/inline/d771d753-6569-44dc-9a4c-3a300a68ce82:3e38c9d6ffb5d9cd2af1bb4d94913dd9d40fee4c/NIFUrapport2019-25.pdf

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2017). Verdier og prinsipper for grunnopplæringen - overordnet del av læreplanverket. Hentet fra https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/53d21ea2bc3a4202b86b83cfe82da93e/overordnet-del---verdier-og-prinsipper-for-grunnopplaringen.pdf

Martinussen, M., Reedtz, C., Eng, H., Neumer, S.-P., Patras, J., & Mørch, W.-T. (2019). Ungsinn. Tidsskrift for virksomme tiltak for barn og unge. Kriterier og prosedyrer for vurdering og klassifisering av tiltak. https://ungsinn.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Ungsinn_kriterier_screen_2019-V2.1.pdf

Morin, A. H. (2020). Teacher support and the social classroom environment as predictors of student loneliness. Social Psychology of Education, 23(6), 1687–1707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09600-z

Morin, A. H, (2021a). The VIP Partnership Programme in Norwegian Schools: An Assessment of Intervention Effects. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(7), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1791247

Morin, A. H. (2021b). Influence of the Psychosocial School Environment on Adolescents’ Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Loneliness: Impact of a Psychosocial School Programme and Other Factors. NTNU. Hentet fra https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2830392?show=full

Morin, A. H. (2022). Promoting positive social classroom environments to enhance students’ mental health? Effectiveness of a school-based programme in Norway. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101966. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035522000441

Netwerk (u.å.). Følgeforskning af Netwerk. Hentet 04.09.21 fra https://projektnetwerk.dk/foelgeforskning-af-netwerk/

NOU 2015: 2. (2015). Å høre til – virkemidler for et trygt psykososialt skolemiljø. Kunnskapsdepartementet. Hentet fra https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2015-2/id2400765/

Ogden, T. (2009). Sosial kompetanse og problematferd i skolen. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

Olsen, M. I., & Traavik, K. M. (2010). Resiliens i skolen – teori og tiltak. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

Rimehaug, T., Singstad, M. T., Ekornes, S., Westbye, O. S., & Andersen, A. C. (2021). Ungdom blir syke av å havne i sosiale tomrom. Hentet fra https://www.ntnu.no/blogger/helse/nb/ungdom-blir-syke-av-a-havne-i-sosiale-tomrom/

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147

Skaalvik, E. M., & Federici, R. A. (2015). Prestasjonspresset i skolen. Bedre skole, 3, 11–15.

Skoleprogrammet VIP & Rosenvilde videregående skole (2015). Man har alltid noen å sitte med slik at ingen føler seg utenfor: Evalueringsrapport VIP-makkerskap. Retrieved from https://vestreviken.no/seksjon/skoleprogrammet-vip/PublishingImages/Sider/VIP-makkerskap/Evalueringsrapport%20VIP-makkerskap%20Endelig%20utgave%2017.3.15.pdf

Skoleprogrammet VIP (2016). En plass for alle: Evalueringsrapport VIP-makkerskap. Hentet fra https://vestreviken.no/seksjon/skoleprogrammet-vip/PublishingImages/Sider/VIP-makkerskap/En%20plass%20for%20alle,%20%20evalueringsrapport%20VIP-makkerskap%20(2016).pdf

Skoleprogrammet VIP (2019). Alle blir kjent med alle: evalueringsrapport VIP-makerskap. Hentet fra https://vestreviken.no/seksjon/skoleprogrammet-vip/PublishingImages/Sider/VIP-makkerskap/Alle%20blir%20kjent%20med%20alle%20(2019).pdf

Spurkeland, J. (2012). Relasjonskompetanse: Resultater gjennom samhandling. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Tvedt, M. S., Bru, L. E., Idsøe, T., & Niemiec, C. (2021). Intentions to quit, emotional support from teachers, and loneliness among peers: Developmental trajectories and longitudinal associations in upper secondary school. Educational Psychology, 41(8), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1948505

Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2011). Arbeid mot mobbing. Veileder for ansatte og ledere i grunnskolen. Hentet fra http://ssn.nfk.no/_f/p34/i91c49d52-5705-4baf-a5e8-ad5cc11eaf2c/arbeid_mot_mobbing_veileder_bm.pdf

Valås, H. (1999). Students with learning disabilities and lowachieving students: peer acceptance, loneliness, self-esteem, and depression. Social Psychology of Education, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009626828789

Webster-Stratton, C. (2005). Hvordan fremme sosial og emosjonell kompetanse hos barn. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

Wenger, E. (2004). Praksisfælleskaber. København: Hans Reitzel.

Wiltink, J., Kliem, S., Michal, M., Subic-Wrana, C., Reiner, I., Beutel, M. E., . . . Zwerenz, R. (2017). Mini - social phobia inventory (mini-SPIN): psychometric properties and population based norms of the German version. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1545-2

Teenage classmates standing in high school hallway.

Additional Files

Published

2023-04-04

How to Cite

Havik, T., & Rye, M. (2023). Systematic review and classification of: The VIP Partnership Program. Ungsinn. Journal of Effective Interventions for Children and Adolescents, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.7557/25.6908

Issue

Section

Peer-reviewed Articles