Healthcare professionals contraceptive counselling
a qualitative study of young women's experiences with contraceptive counselling and choice of contraceptive method.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/14.6717Keywords:
Qualitative research design, guidance, birth control, unintended pregnancy, decision makingAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to gain an in-depth knowledge of young women’s experiences with receiving contraceptive counselling from healthcare professionals, and to examine which factors that influence their choice of a contraceptive method. Methods: The study has a qualitative research design. Ten individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. The participants were young women aged 18-25 who used contraceptives and lived in Norway. Data were analysed using systematic text-condensation. Results: Some women were satisfied with the contraceptive counselling they received, and experienced being cared for. Others experienced the counselling as deficient and received limited information about the safety of contraceptives, side-effects and alternative methods. Furthermore, they did not experience the counselling to be tailored to their individual needs. Women’s choices of contraceptives were influenced by factors such as the safety of the method, administration, potential side-effects, friends and healthcare professionals. Conclusion: The study revealed a potential for improvement in the counselling the young women received. The women experienced being met by healthcare professionals who showed little interest, and who lacked the knowledge to give them the information they needed. Furthermore, the women's decisions were influenced by several factors, which may be an advantage for healthcare professionals to be aware of. The study contributes knowledge that is relevant to midwives, health nurses and doctors in their future work with contraceptive counselling of young women.
Metrics
References
Anderson, N., Steinauer, J., Valente, T., Koblentz, J. & Dehlendorf, C. (2014). Women's social communication about IUDs: a qualitative analysis. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 46(3), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1814
Bitzer, J., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Roumen, F., Marintcheva-Petrova, M., van Bakel, B. & Oddens, B. J. (2012). The CHOICE study: Effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 17(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2011.637586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2011.637586
Brault, M. A., Curry, L. A., Kershaw, T. S., Singh, K., Vash-Margita, A. & Camenga, D. R. (2021). Supporting Patient-centered Communication on Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health - Perspectives to Build an Appointment Planning Tool. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 34(5), 725-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2021.04.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2021.04.009
Carbone, S. L., Guillen, M., Ramirez, J. J., Vargas, S. E., Lu, C. F., Getz, M. L., . . .Tong, I. (2020). ‘I feel like a person has a right to use a product to protect themselves…’: a qualitative study of the risk–benefit calculus on women’s contraceptive use and choice. Sexual Health, 17(3), 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19197
Charles, C., Gafni, A. & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social science & medicine, 44(5), 681-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3
Chen, M., Lindley, A., Kimport, K. & Dehlendorf, C. (2019). An in-depth analysis of the use of shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception, 99(3), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.009
Cohen, R., Sheeder, J., Kane, M. & Teal, S. B. (2017). Factors associated with contraceptive method choice and initiation in adolescents and young women. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(4), 454-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.008
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (4. utg.). SAGE Publications.
De nasjonale forskningsetiske komiteene. (2019, 14. november 2021). Generelle forskningsetiske retningslinjer. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/retningslinjer/generelle/
Dehlendorf, C., Fox, E., Sobel, L. & Borrero, S. (2016). Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling: Evidence to Inform Practice. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 5(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-016-0139-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-016-0139-1
Dehlendorf, C., Grumbach, K., Schmittdiel, J. A. & Steinauer, J. (2017). Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception, 95(5), 452-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.010
Dehlendorf, C., Kimport, K., Levy, K. & Steinauer, J. (2014). A Qualitative Analysis of Approaches to Contraceptive Counseling. Perspect Sex Repro H, 46(4), 233-240. 10.1363/46e2114. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e2114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/46e2114
Dehlendorf, C., Levy, K., Kelley, A., Grumbach, K. & Steinauer, J. (2013). Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception, 88(2), 250-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012
Fox, E., Reyna, A., Malcolm, N. M., Rosmarin, R. B., Zapata, L. B., Frederiksen, B. N., . . .Dehlendorf, C. (2018). Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(5), 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006
Fulcher, K., Drabkin, M., Gibson, J., Francoeur, J., Eurchuk, A., Weaver, M., . . .Lachowsky, N. J. (2021). Contraceptive decision-making and priorities: What happens before patients see a healthcare provider. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 30(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2020-0052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2020-0052
Furu, K., Aares, E. B., Hjellvik, V. & Karlstad, Ø. (2021). Hormonal contraceptive use in Norway, 2006-2020, by contraceptive type, age and county: A nationwide register-based study. Norsk epidemiologi, 29(1-2). https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4046
Goldhammer, D. L., Fraser, C., Wigginton, B., Harris, M. L., Bateson, D., Loxton, D., . . .Lucke, J. C. (2017). What do young Australian women want (when talking to doctors about contraception)? BMC Family Practice, 18(1), 35-35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0616-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0616-2
Grant, R. L., Paul, R., Zeal, C., Madden, T. & Politi, M. C. (2020). Decisional conflict associated with clinicians discouraging particular contraceptive methods. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(6), 1612-1619. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13364
Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. (2020, juni 2022). Handlingsplan for fortsatt reduksjon i antall svangerskapsavbrudd. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/59df2395e37f473b93e2da02db01f69c/hod-handlingsplan.pdf
Helsedirektoratet. (2020, 12. januar 2022). Prevensjon: Helsestasjon for ungdom skal gi prevensjonsveiledning og sikre tilgjengelig og sikker prevensjon. https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/helsestasjons-og-skolehelsetjenesten
Helsedirektoratet. (2021, 23. desember 2021). Leger, helsesykepleiere og jordmødre kan rekvirere hormonell prevensjon til personer under 16 år. https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/faglige-rad/rekvirering-av-hormonell-prevensjon
Hirth, J. M., Dinehart, E. E., Lin, Y.-L., Kuo, Y.-F. & Patel, P. R. (2021). Reasons why young women in the United States choose their contraceptive method. Journal of Women's Health, 30(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.8182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.8182
Levy, K., Minnis, A. M., Lahiff, M., Schmittdiel, J. & Dehlendorf, C. (2015). Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: An investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling. Women's Health Issues, 25(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.10.001
Lukasse, M., Baglo, M. C. G., Engdal, E., Lassemo, R. & Forsberg, K. E. (2021). Norwegian women's experiences and opinions on contraceptive counselling: A systematic textcondensation study. European Journal of Midwifery, 5(2), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/132224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/132224
Mahony, H., Spinner, C., Vamos, C. A. & Daley, E. M. (2021). Social Network Influences on Young Women's Choice to Use Long‐Acting Reversible Contraception: A Systematic Review. Journal of midwifery & women's health, 66(6), 758-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13280
Malterud, K. (2017). Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag (4. utg.). Universitetsforlaget.
Marshall, C., Guendelman, S., Mauldon, J. & Nuru‐Jeter, A. (2016). Young women's contraceptive decision making: do preferences for contraceptive attributes align with method choice? Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 48(3), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e10116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/48e10116
Marshall, C., Kandahari, N. & Raine-Bennett, T. (2018). Exploring young women's decisional needs for contraceptive method choice: a qualitative study. Contraception, 97(3), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.004
Meier, S., Sundstrom, B., Delay, C. & DeMaria, A. L. (2021). “Nobody’s ever told me that:” Women’s experiences with shared decision-making when accessing contraception. Health Communication, 36(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1669271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1669271
Melo, J. M. D., Peters, M. M. P. H., Teal, S. M. D. M. P. H. & Guiahi, M. M. D. M. (2015). Adolescent and Young Women's Contraceptive Decision-Making Processes: Choosing “The Best Method for Her”. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 28(4), 224-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.001
Merki-Feld, G. S., Caetano, C., Porz, T. C. & Bitzer, J. (2018). Are there unmet needs in contraceptive counselling and choice? Findings of the European TANCO Study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 23(3), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1465546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1465546
Minnis, A. M., Mavedzenge, S. N., Luecke, E. & Dehlendorf, C. (2014). Provider Counseling to Young Women Seeking Family Planning Services. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(4), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1414
Nappi, R. E., Vermuyten, N. & Bannemerschult, R. (2021). Missed opportunities in contraceptive counselling: findings from a European survey-based study with simulated patient consultation. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 27(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2021.2010040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2021.2010040
Oppelt, P. G., Baier, F., Fahlbusch, C., Heusinger, K., Hildebrandt, T., Breuel, C. & Dittrich, R. (2017). What do patients want to know about contraception and which method would they prefer? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 295(6), 1483-1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4373-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4373-1
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2020) NVivo (versjon 1.0) [programvare]. QSR International Pty Ltd. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
Pasient- og brukerrettighetsloven. (2001). Lov om pasient- og brukerrettigheter (LOV-1999-07-02-63). Lovdata. https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-02-63
Rubin, S. E., Felsher, M., Korich, F. & Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Urban adolescents' and young adults' decision-making process around selection of intrauterine contraception. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 29(3), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.001
Ræder, M. B., Johansen, M. & Offerdal, K. (2021, 11.11.21). Prevensjon. https://www.legeforeningen.no/foreningsledd/fagmed/norsk-gynekologisk-forening/veiledere/veileder-i-gynekologi/prevensjon/
Sangraula, M., Garbers, S., Garth, J., Shakibnia, E. B., Timmons, S. & Gold, M. A. (2017). Integrating long-acting reversible contraception services into New York City school-based health centers: quality improvement to ensure provision of youth-friendly services. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 30(3), 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.004
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental review, 28(1), 78-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
Sucato, G. S., Bhatt, S. K., Murray, P. J. & Ott, M. A. (2011). Transdermal contraception as a model for adolescent use of new methods. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(4), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.008
World Health Organization. (2014). Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: Guidance and recommendations. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/102539/9789241506748_eng.pdf?sequence=1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Caroline Norheim Rosten, Siri Dammen, Ingvild Aune
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).