Mixed Methods Designs: vitenskapsteoretiske posisjoner – muligheter og utfordringer

Forfattere

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/14.6743

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Mixed methods, sykepleieforskning, forskning på sykepleieutdanning

Sammendrag

Målet med essayet er å drøfte vitenskapsteoretiske posisjoner og hvilke implikasjoner disse har for å anvende mixed methods design. Det finnes ulike måter å kombinere kvalitative og kvantitative metoder, en av dem kalles sekvensiell design, et design forfatterne av essayet har erfaring med. Essayet vil gi leseren en innføring i mixed methods, før den drøfter muligheter og utfordringer. Til slutt beskrives kort muligheter og utfordringer forfatterne erfarte ved å anvende sekvensielt design i egne studier.

Statistikk

Laster statistikk…

Referanser

Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Reseach. I A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (Second ed., pp. 95-117). SAGE.

Brunborg, G. S., Scheffels, J., Tokle, R., Buvik, K., Kvaavik, E., & Andreas, J. B. (2019). Monitoring young lifestyles (MyLife) - a prospective longitudinal quantitative and qualitative study of youth development and substance use in Norway. BMJ Open 9, e031084. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2019-031084

Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209625

Creamer, E. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/978107180282

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. (2nd Edition ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, (3rd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative & mixed methods approaches, (5th edition ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2021). Educational Reseach. Planning, Conducting, and Evalueting Quantitative and Qualitative Reseach (sixed edition ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962

Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., & Byrne, G. (2016). An overview of mixed methods research – revisited. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(8), 623-635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116674257

Drageset, J., Eide, G. E., & Hauge, S. (2016). Symptoms of depression, sadness and sense of coherence (coping) among cognitively intact older people with cancer living in nursing homes-a mixed-methods study. Peer J, 4 (e2096). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2096

Drageset, S. (2012). Psychological distress, coping and social support in the diagnostic and preoperative phase of breast cancer. [Doktorgradsavhandling] Universitetet i Bergen. https://hdl.handle.net/1956/6139

Howe, K. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Reseacher, 8, 10-16.

Johnson, B. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Maxwell, J. A., & Mittapalli, K. (2010). Realism as Stance for Mixed Methods Research. I A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (Second ed., pp. 145-167). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regaine. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.

Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Principles and procedures of mixed methods design. Walnut Creek, CA.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Ree, E., Wiig, S., Braithwaite, J., & Aase, I. (2020). To what degree and how do healthcare professionals in nursing homes and homecare practice user involvement? A mixed methods study. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning, 6(2), 119-136.

Røykenes, K. (2015). Testangst hos sykepleiestudenter: «Alternativ behandling». [Doktorgradsavhandling] Universitetet i Bergen. https://www.nb.no/items/URN:NBN:no-nb¬_digibok_2020022107503

Sale, J. E., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and quantity, 36, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies. Res. Nurs. Health, 23, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H

Skamagki, G., Carpenter, C., King, A., & Wåhlin, C. (2022). Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace from the Perspective of Older Employees: A Mixed Methods Research Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159348

Stevenson, C. (2005). Practical inquiry/theory in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50, 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03379.x

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: Exploring the Nature of Research Questions in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302814

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research : integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.

Nedlastinger

Publisert

19.04.2024

Hvordan referere

Røykenes, K., & Drageset, S. (2024). Mixed Methods Designs: vitenskapsteoretiske posisjoner – muligheter og utfordringer. Nordisk tidsskrift for helseforskning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.7557/14.6743

Utgave

Seksjon

Fagfellevurderte essays